review-solid-clean-code

review-solid-clean-code is a skill for Claude Code, Codex from mickeyyaya/refactoring-skills. It costs 67 tokens per session (1,660 once invoked), scanned A, original, MIT.

A guide to spotting violations of SOLID design principles and common clean-code practices. These are rules of thumb for keeping code focused, understandable, and easier to change.

In plain words
What is it for?
Use it during pull-request reviews or refactoring to identify design problems and choose suitable improvements.
Why use it?
It helps reveal classes that do too much, repeated logic, growing condition chains, and designs that make testing or changes difficult.

Skill for Claude CodeCodex

Written for no agent in particular: nothing here depends on one.

Good fit Use it during pull-request reviews or refactoring to identify design problems and choose suitable improvements.

Compare 6 skills from other repositories ↓
Install with agentmods
npx agentmods add skills/mickeyyaya/refactoring-skills/review-solid-clean-code
Install

Getting it into your agent

One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.

Any agent
npx skills add mickeyyaya/refactoring-skills --skill review-solid-clean-code
Clone the repo
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/mickeyyaya/refactoring-skills

Made for: Claude Code, Codex.

Wrote this? Show the measurements

A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.

agentmods badge for review-solid-clean-code

README.md
[![agentmods](https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/mickeyyaya/refactoring-skills/review-solid-clean-code/github.svg)](https://agentmods.dev/skills/mickeyyaya/refactoring-skills/review-solid-clean-code)
Your own site
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/mickeyyaya/refactoring-skills/review-solid-clean-code"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/mickeyyaya/refactoring-skills/review-solid-clean-code/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>

Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.

agentmods 80×15 button for review-solid-clean-code

Your own site · 80×15
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/mickeyyaya/refactoring-skills/review-solid-clean-code"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/mickeyyaya/refactoring-skills/review-solid-clean-code.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>
Per session 67 Skills are progressive disclosure: only the name and description are preloaded; the body loads when the skill is used.
When invoked 1,660 The whole file, excluding the scripts and references it only reads on demand.
Security scan A 0 findings. A grade says what 26 rules found in the file — not that it is safe.
Origin original No closer match found in the catalogue.
Token cost

What it costs to keep this loaded

Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.

ModelPer sessionOnce invoked
Fable 5.1 $0.00067 $0.01660
Opus 5 $0.00034 $0.00830
Sonnet 5 $0.00013 $0.00332
Haiku 4.5 $0.00007 $0.00166

Measured 9d ago against content hash 37be99c7ede4, method: parsed. Prices are Anthropic first-party input rates as of 2026-09-12, from the pricing page.

Security

Grade A, and why

review-solid-clean-code scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 9d ago.

A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.

Nothing flagged

None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.

skills/review-solid-clean-code/SKILL.md · 197 lines

How it starts

The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 197 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.

Review: SOLID Principles and Clean Code

When to Use

  • Pull request review when code smells are present
  • After detecting Bloater or Change Preventer smells (see detect-code-smells)
  • A class or module is hard to test in isolation
  • A change in one place forces changes in many others

SOLID Principles

SRP -- Single Responsibility Principle

One class = one reason to change.

Red Flags: Class name contains "Manager"/"Utils", 10+ public methods spanning unrelated domains, unrelated imports.

// Violation: persistence, formatting, and email in one class
class UserManager {
  save(user: User): void { /* DB write */ }
  formatReport(user: User): string { /* HTML formatting */ }
  sendWelcomeEmail(user: User): void { /* SMTP call */ }
}

Fix: Extract Class -> UserRepository, UserReportFormatter, UserEmailService. See refactor-moving-features.


OCP -- Open/Closed Principle

Open for extension, closed for modification.

Red Flags: switch/if-else chain on type tag that grows with each new type, adding features requires editing existing tested classes.

// Violation: every new shape requires modifying this function
function area(shape: Shape): number {
  if (shape.type === "circle") return Math.PI * shape.radius ** 2;
  if (shape.type === "square") return shape.side ** 2;
}

Fix: Interface with polymorphism (Shape.area()). See refactor-simplifying-conditionals, design-patterns-behavioral (Strategy).


LSP -- Liskov Substitution Principle

Subtypes must be substitutable for their base types without altering correctness.

Red Flags: Subclass overrides with NotImplemented, instanceof checks in business logic, subclass narrows preconditions.

// Violation: Square breaks Rectangle contract
class Square extends Rectangle {
  setWidth(w: number): void { this.width = w; this.height = w; }
}

// Violation: instanceof checks
function process(animal: Animal): void {
  if (animal instanceof Dog) { /* dog-specific */ }
}

Read the full file on GitHub · 197 lines

Changes

What this file has done since we first saw it

Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.

  1. 9d ago First seen · 197 lines · 67 tokens per session scan A 37be99c7ede4

Subscribe to this mod's changes

review-solid-clean-code is a skill published in the GitHub repository mickeyyaya/refactoring-skills (6 stars, last pushed 5mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 67 tokens to every session and 1,660 once invoked, about $0.0003 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-09-03.