agent-evaluation-designer

agent-evaluation-designer is a skill for Claude Code, Codex from microsoft/cat-agent-skills. It costs 96 tokens per session (1,341 once invoked), scanned A, original, MIT.

A framework for evaluating whether an AI agent performs well on its intended tasks. It helps define what a good answer means, design test questions, choose grading methods, and make a go or no-go decision.

In plain words
What is it for?
Use it to evaluate an agent, create test sets and expected answers, choose measures such as exact match or meaning, find regressions, and decide whether the agent is ready to ship.
Why use it?
It prevents teams from judging an agent with vague standards or tests that do not reflect real use. It makes the evaluation criteria and final release decision clearer.

Skill for Claude CodeCodex ✓ vendor

Written for no agent in particular: nothing here depends on one.

Good fit Use it to evaluate an agent, create test sets and expected answers, choose measures such as exact match or meaning, find regressions, and decide whether the agent is ready to ship.

Compare 6 skills from other repositories ↓
Install with agentmods
npx agentmods add skills/microsoft/cat-agent-skills/agent-evaluation-designer
About the project

microsoft/cat-agent-skills is a static website that catalogs reusable instruction sets and related packages for AI agents. People use it to search, filter, rate, and download skills for Cowork, Copilot Studio, and Scout, along with Copilot plugins and Scout automations. The catalogue entries are the skills, instructions, plugins, and settings displayed by the site.

microsoft/cat-agent-skills · 64 stars · on GitHub

Install

Getting it into your agent

One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.

Any agent
npx skills add microsoft/cat-agent-skills --skill agent-evaluation-designer
Clone the repo
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/microsoft/cat-agent-skills

Made for: Claude Code, Codex.

Wrote this? Show the measurements

A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.

agentmods badge for agent-evaluation-designer

README.md
[![agentmods](https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/microsoft/cat-agent-skills/agent-evaluation-designer.svg)](https://agentmods.dev/skills/microsoft/cat-agent-skills/agent-evaluation-designer)
Your own site
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/microsoft/cat-agent-skills/agent-evaluation-designer"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/microsoft/cat-agent-skills/agent-evaluation-designer.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>
Per session 96 Skills are progressive disclosure: only the name and description are preloaded; the body loads when the skill is used.
When invoked 1,341 The whole file, excluding the scripts and references it only reads on demand.
Security scan A 0 findings. A grade says what 26 rules found in the file — not that it is safe. Third-party audits
  • NVIDIA SkillSpector pass 7 Sept 2026
How audits are shown
Origin original No closer match found in the catalogue.
Token cost

What it costs to keep this loaded

Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.

ModelPer sessionOnce invoked
Fable 5.1 $0.00096 $0.01341
Opus 5 $0.00048 $0.00671
Sonnet 5 $0.00019 $0.00268
Haiku 4.5 $0.00010 $0.00134

Measured 8d ago against content hash 11850d009e42, method: parsed. Prices are Anthropic first-party input rates as of 2026-09-07, from the pricing page.

Security

Grade A, and why

agent-evaluation-designer scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 8d ago.

A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.

Nothing flagged

None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.

submissions/agent-evaluation-designer/SKILL.md · 106 lines

How it starts

The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 106 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.

Agent Evaluation Designer

You help the user design and run a rigorous, defensible evaluation of an AI agent and turn the results into a clear go / no-go decision. Evaluation is a product discipline, not a technical formality: your job is to make the user define what "good" means before testing, pick the right way to measure it, and stay accountable to the result.

Work through the five stages below in order. Do not skip stage 1 - most bad evaluations fail because "good" was never defined. Ask concise questions when you lack the information a stage needs; otherwise proceed and state your assumptions.

Stage 1 - Define what "good" means

Establish the evaluation's purpose before writing a single test.

  1. Ask what decision the evaluation must support (ship / don't ship, compare two versions, catch regressions, satisfy a stakeholder or compliance gate).
  2. Ask who the agent serves and the top real-world tasks it must get right.
  3. For each task, define the quality dimensions that matter, choosing from:
    • Correctness / groundedness - is the answer factually right and grounded in the agent's sources?
    • Completeness - does it cover the required points?
    • Relevance - does it answer what was asked?
    • Tone / format / compliance - does it meet wording, safety, or policy rules?
    • Tool / action use - did it call the right capability or resource?
  4. Write a one-line success bar per dimension (e.g. "names the correct return window and the required proof of purchase, in a friendly tone").

Output of this stage: a short list of prioritized scenarios, each with the dimensions and success bar that define a pass.

Stage 2 - Choose the grading method per scenario

Pick the cheapest method that actually measures the dimension you care about. Never default to exact/verbatim matching for long generative answers - it fails good answers for trivial wording differences. Use this decision guide:

Read the full file on GitHub · 106 lines

Files

What ships with it

3 files beside SKILL.md in the same directory: the scripts, references and assets a skill reads on demand. Not counted in the per-session cost; read them before you install if any of them is executable.

Changes

What this file has done since we first saw it

Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.

  1. 8d ago First seen · 106 lines · 96 tokens per session scan A 11850d009e42

Subscribe to this mod's changes

agent-evaluation-designer is a skill published in the GitHub repository microsoft/cat-agent-skills (64 stars, last pushed today), licensed MIT. It adds 96 tokens to every session and 1,341 once invoked, about $0.0005 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.

Related

Other skills, from other repositories

research-engineer

An uncompromising Academic Research Engineer. Operates with absolute scientific rigor, objective criticism, and zero flair. Focuses on theoretical correctness, formal verification, and optimal implementation across any required technology.

davila7/claude-code-templates · 43 tokens

tika-eval-compare

Compare extracts from two Tika builds over a corpus to detect regressions in content, encoding, exceptions, and embedded-document handling. Use for "compare before/after extracts", "eval this change against the corpus".

apache/tika · 50 tokens

neuron-evaluation-engineer

Create and run AI evaluations with datasets, assertions, and output drivers in Neuron AI. Use this skill whenever the user mentions evaluation, testing AI systems, creating evaluators, dataset-driven testing, assertion-based validation, or wants to measure AI system performance. Also trigger for tasks involving…

neuron-core/neuron-ai · 77 tokens

jetson-validate-image

Use after jetson-flash-image to run static BSP checks, on-target smoke/regression tests on a flashed DUT, or both. Not for build or flash steps. Triggers: validate bsp, on-target validation.

NVIDIA/skills · 50 tokens

atmos-validation

Validate Atmos projects, components, arbitrary JSON Schema inputs, EditorConfig, and GitHub Actions; use affected-file selection and native CI annotations.

cloudposse/atmos · 31 tokens

skill-benchmark

Benchmark AI skill effectiveness by measuring implementation quality against legacy constraints.

HoangNguyen0403/agent-skills-standard · 16 tokens