Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx agentmods add skills/microsoft/shadowfrog/shadow-frognpx skills add microsoft/ShadowFrog --skill shadow-froggit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/microsoft/ShadowFrogWhat it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5 | $0.00117 | $0.03408 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00059 | $0.01704 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00023 | $0.00682 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00012 | $0.00341 |
Grade A, and why
shadow-frog scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 2d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 374 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
ShadowFrog
.shadow/ mirrors the source tree. Each source file has a .md shadow organized
by symbol. Each symbol section contains discoveries — behavioral insights anchored
to that code location.
Required Actions
Every time you work on code in a repo with .shadow/:
- Read
_prefs.mdfirst — it contains project-wide conventions, user preferences, and things the user explicitly wants to avoid. Violating a preference wastes the user's time. - Read
_cross/discoveries — these are the highest-value findings, spanning multiple files. List_cross/and read any files whose titles relate to the area you're working in. Cross-cutting discoveries reveal hidden contracts, interaction bugs, and design patterns that per-file shadows alone cannot capture. - Check
_dreams/for experiment results —_dreams/_index.mdlists autonomous exploration experiments. Read reports relevant to your task — they contain verified bug analyses, attempted fixes, and architectural insights. Dreams may contain knowledge not yet distilled into per-file shadows, so always check when investigating a bug or unfamiliar area. - Before editing any file: read its shadow (
.shadow/<path>.md), check_cross/for cross-cutting discoveries about it, and apply what you learn. The shadow contains known bugs, edge cases, and implicit contracts discovered by previous sessions. Note:_index.mddiscovery counts may be stale — always check per-file shadows and_cross/directly rather than relying solely on the index summary. - When the user explains something about code (gotcha, design intent,
warning, history): write a
source: userdiscovery to the shadow immediately. Do not ask where to put it — resolve thefile::symbolanchor yourself by searching_index.md, shadow files, and session context (current file, recent edits). - When the user states a preference or convention (not tied to any
specific file): write it to
_prefs.mdimmediately. - After code changes: run
/shadow-frog-update
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 2d ago First seen · 374 lines · 117 tokens per session scan A d50f78b029f9
shadow-frog is a skill published in the GitHub repository microsoft/ShadowFrog (21 stars, last pushed 13d ago), licensed MIT. It adds 117 tokens to every session and 3,408 once invoked, about $0.0006 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other skills, from other repositories
systematic-debugging
Use when encountering any bug, test failure, or unexpected behavior, before proposing fixes.
next-cache-components-adoption
Turn on Cache Components in a Next.js app and resolve the blocking routes it surfaces. Use when the user wants to enable, adopt, or migrate to Cache Components, flip the cacheComponents flag, work through a flood of blocking-prerender / instant validation errors, run the cache-components-instant-false codemod, or…
babysit-pr
Babysit a GitHub pull request after creation by continuously polling review comments, CI checks/workflow runs, and mergeability state until the PR is merged/closed or user help is required. Diagnose failures, retry likely flaky failures up to 3 times, auto-fix/push branch-related issues when appropriate, and keep…
imagegen
Generate or edit raster images when the task benefits from AI-created bitmap visuals such as photos, illustrations, textures, sprites, mockups, or transparent-background cutouts. Use when Codex should create a brand-new image, transform an existing image, or derive visual variants from references, and the output…
cpu-profile-analysis
Analyze V8/Chrome CPU profiles (.cpuprofile) and DevTools trace files (Trace-.json). Use when: profiling performance, investigating slow functions, comparing code paths, finding bottlenecks, analyzing timeToRequest, understanding call trees from sampling profiler data, analyzing layout/paint/rendering, investigating…
next-cache-components-optimizer
Drive a Next.js route to instant navigation by setting up an agentic loop, under Cache Components / PPR, on initial load (hard navigation) and client-side navigation (soft navigation). Encode the goal as a failing @next/playwright instant() e2e and work it to green, one verified route at a time; the shipped test then…