Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add midFang/ai-agent-skills-workflow --skill bugfix-donegit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/midFang/ai-agent-skills-workflowWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/midfang/ai-agent-skills-workflow/bugfix-done)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/midfang/ai-agent-skills-workflow/bugfix-done"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/midfang/ai-agent-skills-workflow/bugfix-done/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/midfang/ai-agent-skills-workflow/bugfix-done"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/midfang/ai-agent-skills-workflow/bugfix-done.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00135 | $0.01700 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00054 | $0.00680 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00027 | $0.00340 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00014 | $0.00170 |
Grade A, and why
bugfix-done scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 1mo ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 150 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Bugfix Done
目的
处理 bug 修复流程的后半段:
用户人工验证通过
-> 标记 human_verified
-> 合并到用户指定目标分支
-> 标记 merged
-> 构建并安装目标分支 APK
-> 等用户做合并后/目标分支验证
-> 标记 integration_verified
-> 删除 worktree
-> 标记 worktree_removed
这个 skill 不负责修 bug,不负责构建首次待验证 APK,不负责首次安装。那些由 $bugfix-worktree 完成。本 skill 负责合并成功后的目标分支 APK 构建和安装,供用户做合并后验证。
输入
需要:
bug_id,例如BUG-001- issues CSV 路径,或能从业务项目
issues/<版本>/bug_batch.csv唯一定位 - 目标分支,仅在“合并”阶段必须提供,例如
main、develop、release/x.y
如果用户说“验证通过,合并”,但没有说目标分支,必须先问:
要把 BUG-xxx 合并到哪个目标分支?
不要猜目标分支。
阶段 A:人工验证通过并合并
触发示例:
$bugfix-done BUG-001 验证通过,合并到 main
步骤:
- 读取 issues CSV 中的 bug 行。
- 确认
worktree_path、branch、commit、task_file存在。 - 更新 CSV:
状态=human_verifiedhuman_verify_result=passhuman_verify_note记录用户确认和时间
- 更新
issues/<版本>/tasks/<bug_id>-TASK.md的“用户人工验证”小节。 - 合并前检查:
- bug worktree 没有未提交改动
- 目标分支由用户明确给出
- 执行合并的仓库不能有业务代码/配置类未提交改动
issues/**/*.md、issues/**/*.csv、features/**/*.md、features/**/*.csv、features/**/*.json这类流程文件允许存在改动,不应阻止合并- 如果主仓库因为目标分支已 checkout、工作区限制或其它原因不适合直接合并,可以创建干净的临时集成 worktree 来执行合并
- 切到目标分支。
- 默认执行非 fast-forward merge:
- merge commit message 使用:
Merge <bug_id> fix: <中文问题描述或修复内容> - 中文描述优先取 CSV 的
人工确认描述,其次取标题或问题描述,过长时压缩成一句话。 - 示例:
git merge --no-ff -m "Merge BUG-013 fix: 等待接收设备同意超时只显示一个提示弹窗" <bug-branch>
- merge commit message 使用:
- 合并成功后更新 CSV:
状态=mergedtarget_branch备注记录 merge commit
- 更新 TASK,记录目标分支、merge commit、合并结果。
- 在目标分支构建合并后的 APK:
- 优先使用项目已有 Android 构建命令,例如
./gradlew :app:assembleDebug或./gradlew assembleDebug - 将生成的 APK 复制到
issues/<版本>/apks/<bug_id>-merged.apk
- 安装合并后的 APK:
- 运行
adb devices - 如果有多个设备,询问用户选择 serial
- 执行
adb install -r issues/<版本>/apks/<bug_id>-merged.apk - 可做基础 smoke test,例如启动应用、观察进程、查看 logcat 是否有明显崩溃
- 更新 CSV/TASK:
备注记录合并后 APK 路径、安装设备、安装结果和 smoke test 摘要- TASK 记录“合并后验证待确认”
- 合并后不要删除 worktree。提示用户在目标分支/集成包上再次验证。
如果合并后构建或安装失败:
- 不要删除 worktree。
- 不要回滚已经成功的 merge,除非用户明确要求。
- 保持
状态=merged或设置状态=blocked,根据失败是否阻断用户验证判断。 blocked_reason=integration_failed或更具体的build_failed/device_unavailable。- 在 TASK 记录失败命令、错误摘要和下一步。
What ships with it
1 file beside SKILL.md in the same directory: the scripts, references and assets a skill reads on demand. Not counted in the per-session cost; read them before you install if any of them is executable.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 1mo ago First seen · 150 lines · 135 tokens per session scan A e1cb3dcd6eed
bugfix-done is a skill published in the GitHub repository midFang/ai-agent-skills-workflow (2 stars, last pushed 4mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 135 tokens to every session and 1,700 once invoked, about $0.0005 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.
Other skills, from other repositories
agent-merge-conflict-arbiter
Neutral arbiter for merge conflicts between two agents.
git-advanced-workflows
Master advanced Git workflows including rebasing, cherry-picking, bisect, worktrees, and reflog to maintain clean history and recover from any situation. Use when managing complex Git histories, collaborating on feature branches, or troubleshooting repository issues.
enable-check-includes-strict
Enable and migrate Chromium targets and directories to checkincludesstrict = true, diagnosing and resolving header include violations as part of the checkincludesstrict LSC. Use when adding directories to the allowlist, enabling strict header checks on targets, or resolving CHECKINCLUDESSTRICTUNTRIAGED targets.
resolve-handoff
Emit the complete Resolve handoff with exact modes, outcomes, test evidence, and publication state.
reproduce-and-fix-issues
Reproduce triaged Slack bugs through a configured app-control adapter, verify existing fixes, and open a bounded draft pull request only after before-and-after proof. Use only from the configured Benny repro automation.
cy-orquestrate-issue
Orchestrate GitHub bug resolution through a new CompozyOS managed worktree and Claude Opus 5.5 Medium session per issue. Investigate reported bugs, create missing issues, and dispatch an executor responsible for a detailed PR, green CI, and all CodeRabbit and Greptile feedback. Use when asked to delegate issue…