Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add MilkyWay008/Hermes-OTG --skill peftgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/MilkyWay008/Hermes-OTGWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/milkyway008/hermes-otg/peft)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/milkyway008/hermes-otg/peft"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/milkyway008/hermes-otg/peft/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/milkyway008/hermes-otg/peft"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/milkyway008/hermes-otg/peft.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00022 | $0.03421 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00011 | $0.01710 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00004 | $0.00684 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00002 | $0.00342 |
Grade A, and why
peft-fine-tuning scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 7d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
This is a copy
94% identical to peft — 2 lines differ, which has more behind it and is treated as the original. This page carries a canonical link to it rather than competing with it.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 436 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
PEFT (Parameter-Efficient Fine-Tuning)
Fine-tune LLMs by training <1% of parameters using LoRA, QLoRA, and 25+ adapter methods.
When to use PEFT
Use PEFT/LoRA when:
- Fine-tuning 7B-70B models on consumer GPUs (RTX 4090, A100)
- Need to train <1% parameters (6MB adapters vs 14GB full model)
- Want fast iteration with multiple task-specific adapters
- Deploying multiple fine-tuned variants from one base model
Use QLoRA (PEFT + quantization) when:
- Fine-tuning 70B models on single 24GB GPU
- Memory is the primary constraint
- Can accept ~5% quality trade-off vs full fine-tuning
Use full fine-tuning instead when:
- Training small models (<1B parameters)
- Need maximum quality and have compute budget
- Significant domain shift requires updating all weights
Quick start
Installation
# Basic installation
pip install peft
# With quantization support (recommended)
pip install peft bitsandbytes
# Full stack
pip install peft transformers accelerate bitsandbytes datasets
LoRA fine-tuning (standard)
from transformers import AutoModelForCausalLM, AutoTokenizer, TrainingArguments, Trainer
from peft import get_peft_model, LoraConfig, TaskType
from datasets import load_dataset
# Load base model
model_name = "meta-llama/Llama-3.1-8B"
model = AutoModelForCausalLM.from_pretrained(model_name, torch_dtype="auto", device_map="auto")
tokenizer = AutoTokenizer.from_pretrained(model_name)
tokenizer.pad_token = tokenizer.eos_token
# LoRA configuration
lora_config = LoraConfig(
task_type=TaskType.CAUSAL_LM,
r=16, # Rank (8-64, higher = more capacity)
lora_alpha=32, # Scaling factor (typically 2*r)
lora_dropout=0.05, # Dropout for regularization
target_modules=["q_proj", "v_proj", "k_proj", "o_proj"], # Attention layers
bias="none" # Don't train biases
)
# Apply LoRA
model = get_peft_model(model, lora_config)
model.print_trainable_parameters()
# Output: trainable params: 13,631,488 || all params: 8,043,307,008 || trainable%: 0.17%
# Prepare dataset
dataset = load_dataset("databricks/databricks-dolly-15k", split="train")
def tokenize(example):
text = f"### Instruction:\n{example['instruction']}\n\n### Response:\n{example['response']}"
return tokenizer(text, truncation=True, max_length=512, padding="max_length")
tokenized = dataset.map(tokenize, remove_columns=dataset.column_names)
# Training
training_args = TrainingArguments(
output_dir="./lora-llama",
num_train_epochs=3,
per_device_train_batch_size=4,
gradient_accumulation_steps=4,
learning_rate=2e-4,
fp16=True,
logging_steps=10,
save_strategy="epoch"
)
trainer = Trainer(
model=model,
args=training_args,
train_dataset=tokenized,
data_collator=lambda data: {"input_ids": torch.stack([f["input_ids"] for f in data]),
"attention_mask": torch.stack([f["attention_mask"] for f in data]),
"labels": torch.stack([f["input_ids"] for f in data])}
)
trainer.train()
# Save adapter only (6MB vs 16GB)
model.save_pretrained("./lora-llama-adapter")
What ships with it
2 files beside SKILL.md in the same directory: the scripts, references and assets a skill reads on demand. Not counted in the per-session cost; read them before you install if any of them is executable.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 7d ago First seen · 436 lines · 22 tokens per session scan A e4a15d53266c
peft-fine-tuning is a skill published in the GitHub repository MilkyWay008/Hermes-OTG (15 stars, last pushed 26d ago), licensed MIT. It adds 22 tokens to every session and 3,421 once invoked, about $0.0001 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. It is 94% identical to peft, differing in 2 lines, and is treated as a copy.
Other skills, from other repositories
hunt-llm-ai
Hunt LLM/AI feature bugs — prompt injection, indirect injection, exfiltration viatool-use/markdown, ASCII smuggling, agentic AI security (OWASP Agentic Apps 2026, ASI01-ASI10). Patterns: direct injection ('ignore previous instructions'), indirect injection via documents/web pages/email the model reads, ASCII smuggling…
lijigang-skill
A Chinese-language approach to writing precise, highly structured prompts, sometimes using Lisp-like notation. It combines concise wording, philosophical questioning, and a process for defining roles, conditions, output formats, and revisions.
baoyu-skill
A Chinese-language approach to explaining AI tools and writing prompts—instructions that tell an AI what you want. It emphasizes step-by-step teaching, hands-on testing, plain-language technical explanations, and organized knowledge sharing.
hf-model-card-research
Extract structured metadata — downloads, likes, benchmark claims, file sizes, author statements — from HuggingFace model cards. Used when the user asks you to "check these models on HF", "pull benchmarks for these variants", or "compare what authors claim.".
llm-wiki
Build and maintain a Karpathy-style LLM knowledge base — a self-compiling Obsidian markdown wiki where an Agent ingests raw sources, compiles cross-linked concept/entity/summary pages, answers queries against the corpus, lints the graph for health, and audits in-context human feedback filed from Obsidian or the local…
interactive-prompt-analyzer
World-class prompt analyzer v3: multi-modal, predictive, self-improving, context-aware, with real-time cost estimation, counterfactual reasoning, cross-session learning, adversarial testing, and autonomous optimization.