Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add MilkyWay008/Hermes-OTG --skill trl-fine-tuninggit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/MilkyWay008/Hermes-OTGWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/milkyway008/hermes-otg/trl-fine-tuning)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/milkyway008/hermes-otg/trl-fine-tuning"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/milkyway008/hermes-otg/trl-fine-tuning/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/milkyway008/hermes-otg/trl-fine-tuning"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/milkyway008/hermes-otg/trl-fine-tuning.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00029 | $0.03635 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00012 | $0.01454 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00006 | $0.00727 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00003 | $0.00364 |
Grade A, and why
fine-tuning-with-trl scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 1mo ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
This is a copy
97% identical to trl-fine-tuning — 2 lines differ, which has more behind it and is treated as the original. This page carries a canonical link to it rather than competing with it.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 499 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
TRL - Transformer Reinforcement Learning
Quick start
TRL provides post-training methods for aligning language models with human preferences.
Installation:
pip install trl transformers datasets peft accelerate
Supervised Fine-Tuning (instruction tuning):
from trl import SFTTrainer
trainer = SFTTrainer(
model="Qwen/Qwen2.5-0.5B",
train_dataset=dataset, # Prompt-completion pairs
)
trainer.train()
DPO (align with preferences):
from trl import DPOTrainer, DPOConfig
config = DPOConfig(output_dir="model-dpo", beta=0.1)
trainer = DPOTrainer(
model=model,
args=config,
train_dataset=preference_dataset, # chosen/rejected pairs
processing_class=tokenizer
)
trainer.train()
Common workflows
Workflow 1: Full RLHF pipeline (SFT → Reward Model → RLOO)
Complete pipeline from base model to human-aligned model.
Note (TRL 1.x): PPO has been removed from TRL —
PPOTrainer,PPOConfig, andpython -m trl.scripts.ppono longer exist. Use an online-RL trainer TRL still ships: RLOO (RLOOTrainer/trl rloo) is the closest drop-in for a reward-model-driven RLHF pipeline, and GRPO (GRPOTrainer/trl grpo, see Workflow 3) is the memory-efficient alternative. The step below uses RLOO.
Copy this checklist:
RLHF Training:
- [ ] Step 1: Supervised fine-tuning (SFT)
- [ ] Step 2: Train reward model
- [ ] Step 3: RLOO reinforcement learning
- [ ] Step 4: Evaluate aligned model
Step 1: Supervised fine-tuning
Train base model on instruction-following data:
from transformers import AutoModelForCausalLM, AutoTokenizer
from trl import SFTTrainer, SFTConfig
from datasets import load_dataset
# Load model
model = AutoModelForCausalLM.from_pretrained("Qwen/Qwen2.5-0.5B")
tokenizer = AutoTokenizer.from_pretrained("Qwen/Qwen2.5-0.5B")
# Load instruction dataset
dataset = load_dataset("trl-lib/Capybara", split="train")
# Configure training
training_args = SFTConfig(
output_dir="Qwen2.5-0.5B-SFT",
per_device_train_batch_size=4,
num_train_epochs=1,
learning_rate=2e-5,
logging_steps=10,
save_strategy="epoch"
)
# Train
trainer = SFTTrainer(
model=model,
args=training_args,
train_dataset=dataset,
processing_class=tokenizer
)
trainer.train()
trainer.save_model()
What ships with it
6 files beside SKILL.md in the same directory: the scripts, references and assets a skill reads on demand. Not counted in the per-session cost; read them before you install if any of them is executable.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 1mo ago First seen · 499 lines · 29 tokens per session scan A 5b00e9b9782b
fine-tuning-with-trl is a skill published in the GitHub repository MilkyWay008/Hermes-OTG (20 stars, last pushed 2mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 29 tokens to every session and 3,635 once invoked, about $0.0001 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. It is 97% identical to trl-fine-tuning, differing in 2 lines, and is treated as a copy.
Other skills, from other repositories
hunt-llm-ai
Hunt LLM/AI feature bugs — prompt injection, indirect injection, exfiltration viatool-use/markdown, ASCII smuggling, agentic AI security (OWASP Agentic Apps 2026, ASI01-ASI10). Patterns: direct injection ('ignore previous instructions'), indirect injection via documents/web pages/email the model reads, ASCII smuggling…
ai-assistant
A workflow guide for designing and evaluating an AI assistant. It covers defining use cases and refusal limits, preparing knowledge, building a prototype, testing examples, and gradually expanding use.
lijigang-skill
A Chinese-language approach to writing precise, highly structured prompts, sometimes using Lisp-like notation. It combines concise wording, philosophical questioning, and a process for defining roles, conditions, output formats, and revisions.
hf-model-card-research
Extract structured metadata — downloads, likes, benchmark claims, file sizes, author statements — from HuggingFace model cards. Used when the user asks you to "check these models on HF", "pull benchmarks for these variants", or "compare what authors claim.".
baoyu-skill
A Chinese-language approach to explaining AI tools and writing prompts—instructions that tell an AI what you want. It emphasizes step-by-step teaching, hands-on testing, plain-language technical explanations, and organized knowledge sharing.
vhir-ingest
How to start an investigation once the evidence is surveyed: which tools to run first, ingesting evidence into OpenSearch (triage packages, memory, delimited files) and querying it. Use after the evidence survey, before analysis, or when ingesting or querying indexed evidence.