Borrowing it
Nothing to install: this file belongs to mindroom-ai/mindroom. Take a copy, put it at the same path in your own repository, and replace the rules that are about this project with yours.
curl -O https://raw.githubusercontent.com/mindroom-ai/mindroom/main/.claude/skills/duplication-audit/SKILL.mdgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/mindroom-ai/mindroomWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/mindroom-ai/mindroom/duplication-audit)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/mindroom-ai/mindroom/duplication-audit"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/mindroom-ai/mindroom/duplication-audit/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/mindroom-ai/mindroom/duplication-audit"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/mindroom-ai/mindroom/duplication-audit.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>- NVIDIA SkillSpector pass
What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00020 | $0.00673 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00010 | $0.00336 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00004 | $0.00135 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00002 | $0.00067 |
Grade A, and why
duplication-audit scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 9d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 86 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Duplication audit and generalization prompt
You are a coding agent working inside a repository. Your job is to find duplicated functionality (not just identical code) and propose a minimal, safe generalization. Keep it simple and avoid adding features.
First steps
- Read project-specific instructions (CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md, or similar) and follow them.
- Ask a brief clarification if the request is ambiguous (for example: report only vs refactor).
Objective
Identify and consolidate duplicated functionality across the codebase. Duplication includes:
- Multiple functions that parse or validate the same data in slightly different ways
- Repeated config parsing or data model manipulation
- Similar external service calls across different modules
- Near-identical error handling or logging patterns
- Repeated setup/teardown logic
- Similar data transforms that can become a shared helper
The goal is to propose a general, reusable abstraction that reduces duplication while preserving behavior. Keep changes minimal and easy to review.
Search strategy
- Map the hot paths
- Scan entry points (CLI, main loops, API handlers) to see what they do repeatedly.
- Look for cross-module patterns: same steps, different files.
- Find duplicate operations
- Use fast search tools to find repeated keywords and patterns.
- Check for repeated parsing, IO, validation, or response formatting.
- Validate duplication is real
- Confirm the functional intent matches (not just similar code).
- Note any subtle differences that must be preserved.
- Propose a minimal generalization
- Suggest a shared helper, utility, or wrapper.
- Avoid over-engineering. If only two call sites exist, keep the helper small.
- Prefer pure functions. Keep IO at the edges.
Deliverables
Provide a concise report with:
- Findings
- List duplicated behaviors with file references and a short description of the shared functionality.
- Explain why these are functionally the same (or nearly the same).
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 9d ago First seen · 86 lines · 20 tokens per session scan A fe21a36cfc80
duplication-audit is a skill published in the GitHub repository mindroom-ai/mindroom (267 stars, last pushed today), licensed Apache-2.0. It adds 20 tokens to every session and 673 once invoked, about $0.0001 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other skills, from other repositories
autoreview
Pre-commit/ship code review: Codex default; optional Claude or Pi.
rework-rate
Measure and interpret PR rework rate — the emerging 5th DORA metric.
omh-code-review
This is a Hermes-native code-review workflow skill.
revdiff-plan
Review the last Codex assistant message (plan, analysis, or proposal) with inline annotations in a TUI overlay. Extracts the most recent response from Codex rollout files and opens it in revdiff for review and annotation. Activates on "revdiff-plan", "review plan with revdiff", "annotate plan", "review last response"…
code-reviewer
Code review specialist focused on patterns, bugs, security, and performance.
agent-teams-simplify-and-harden
Implementation + audit loop using parallel agent teams with structured simplify, harden, and document passes. Spawns implementation agents to do the work, then audit agents to find complexity, security gaps, and spec deviations, then loops until code compiles cleanly, all tests pass, and auditors find zero issues or…