Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add MingyiSecLab/Mingyi-Atlas --skill signature-replaygit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/MingyiSecLab/Mingyi-AtlasWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/mingyiseclab/mingyi-atlas/signature-replay)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/mingyiseclab/mingyi-atlas/signature-replay"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/mingyiseclab/mingyi-atlas/signature-replay/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/mingyiseclab/mingyi-atlas/signature-replay"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/mingyiseclab/mingyi-atlas/signature-replay.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00031 | $0.02346 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00015 | $0.01173 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00006 | $0.00469 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00003 | $0.00235 |
Grade A, and why
signature-replay scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 9d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
This is a copy
100% identical to signature-replay — 3 lines differ, which has more behind it and is treated as the original. This page carries a canonical link to it rather than competing with it.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 263 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Signature Replay Playbook
EIP-712 signatures, permits, meta-transactions, and cross-chain bridges
all use ecrecover (or its variants). Each has well-known bugs.
Bug classes
1. Missing nonce → replay
function execute(uint256 amount, bytes calldata sig) external {
bytes32 h = keccak256(abi.encodePacked(msg.sender, amount));
address signer = ecrecover(h, ...);
require(signer == owner);
// ... withdraw amount
}
A valid signature can be replayed forever — anyone who saw it once can re-submit it. Fix: include a per-user / per-message nonce:
mapping(address => uint256) public nonces;
function execute(uint256 amount, uint256 nonce, bytes calldata sig) external {
require(nonce == nonces[msg.sender]);
nonces[msg.sender]++;
bytes32 h = keccak256(abi.encodePacked(msg.sender, amount, nonce));
// ...
}
2. Missing chain ID → cross-chain replay
A signature valid on Ethereum mainnet shouldn't work on Optimism, Base,
Arbitrum, etc. If chainid() not in the signed payload, signatures
replay across chains:
// VULNERABLE
bytes32 h = keccak256(abi.encodePacked(amount, deadline, nonce));
// SAFE — EIP-712 domain separator includes chainid
bytes32 h = _hashTypedDataV4(...); // OZ helper
This is especially bad for bridges — a signed message intended for chain A executes on chain B.
3. Signature malleability (ecrecover variants)
ecrecover accepts two valid s values for any signed message
(s and -s mod n). This means each signature has two valid forms.
If your contract uses the signature itself as a uniqueness key
(e.g., usedSigs[sig] = true), an attacker can find the malleable
version and bypass:
// VULNERABLE — uses sig as uniqueness key
mapping(bytes => bool) public used;
function execute(bytes calldata sig) external {
require(!used[sig]);
used[sig] = true;
address signer = ecrecover(...);
// ...
}
Fix: use the message hash (not the signature) as uniqueness key.
Modern OZ ECDSA library rejects high-s values, but home-rolled
ecrecover does not.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 9d ago First seen · 263 lines · 31 tokens per session scan A b557a3563f89
signature-replay is a skill published in the GitHub repository MingyiSecLab/Mingyi-Atlas (11 stars, last pushed 2mo ago), licensed Apache-2.0. It adds 31 tokens to every session and 2,346 once invoked, about $0.0002 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. It is 100% identical to signature-replay, differing in 3 lines, and is treated as a copy.
Other skills, from other repositories
cis-aws-foundations-6.5
Ensure the default security group of every VPC restricts all traffic.
cis-aws-foundations-2.1.3
Ensure Organizations management account is not used for workloads.
cis-aws-foundations-2.12
Ensure access keys are rotated every 90 days or less.
cis-aws-foundations-2.5
Ensure MFA is enabled for the 'root' user account.
cis-aws-foundations-4.4
Ensure that server access logging is enabled on the CloudTrail S3 bucket.
cis-aws-foundations-6.1.2
Ensure CIFS access is restricted to trusted networks to prevent unauthorized access.