signature-replay

signature-replay is a skill for Claude Code, Codex from MingyiSecLab/Mingyi-Atlas. It costs 31 tokens per session (2,346 once invoked), scanned A, a copy of signature-replay, Apache-2.0.

A security-audit guide for signature-replay attacks. These happen when someone reuses a valid digital signature because it lacks a one-time number, expiry, or blockchain-specific identity.

In plain words
What is it for?
Use it to review EIP-712 signatures, permits, meta-transactions, bridge messages, nonces, chain IDs, signer checks, and signature formatting.
Why use it?
A signature intended for one action or blockchain can otherwise be submitted again to repeat an operation or use it on another chain.

Skill for Claude CodeCodex

Written for no agent in particular: nothing here depends on one.

Good fit Use it to review EIP-712 signatures, permits, meta-transactions, bridge messages, nonces, chain IDs, signer checks, and signature formatting.

Compare 6 skills from other repositories ↓
Install with agentmods
npx agentmods add skills/mingyiseclab/mingyi-atlas/signature-replay
Install

Getting it into your agent

One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.

Any agent
npx skills add MingyiSecLab/Mingyi-Atlas --skill signature-replay
Clone the repo
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/MingyiSecLab/Mingyi-Atlas

Made for: Claude Code, Codex.

Wrote this? Show the measurements

A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.

agentmods badge for signature-replay

README.md
[![agentmods](https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/mingyiseclab/mingyi-atlas/signature-replay/github.svg)](https://agentmods.dev/skills/mingyiseclab/mingyi-atlas/signature-replay)
Your own site
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/mingyiseclab/mingyi-atlas/signature-replay"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/mingyiseclab/mingyi-atlas/signature-replay/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>

Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.

agentmods 80×15 button for signature-replay

Your own site · 80×15
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/mingyiseclab/mingyi-atlas/signature-replay"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/mingyiseclab/mingyi-atlas/signature-replay.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>
Per session 31 Skills are progressive disclosure: only the name and description are preloaded; the body loads when the skill is used.
When invoked 2,346 The whole file, excluding the scripts and references it only reads on demand.
Security scan A 0 findings. A grade says what 26 rules found in the file — not that it is safe.
Origin 100% copy Near-identical to another mod in the catalogue.
Token cost

What it costs to keep this loaded

Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.

ModelPer sessionOnce invoked
Fable 5.1 $0.00031 $0.02346
Opus 5 $0.00015 $0.01173
Sonnet 5 $0.00006 $0.00469
Haiku 4.5 $0.00003 $0.00235

Measured 9d ago against content hash b557a3563f89, method: parsed. Prices are Anthropic first-party input rates as of 2026-09-12, from the pricing page.

Security

Grade A, and why

signature-replay scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 9d ago.

A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.

Nothing flagged

None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.

Origin

This is a copy

100% identical to signature-replay — 3 lines differ, which has more behind it and is treated as the original. This page carries a canonical link to it rather than competing with it.

src/skills/standard/contracts/signature-replay/SKILL.md · 263 lines

How it starts

The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 263 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.

Signature Replay Playbook

EIP-712 signatures, permits, meta-transactions, and cross-chain bridges all use ecrecover (or its variants). Each has well-known bugs.

Bug classes

1. Missing nonce → replay

function execute(uint256 amount, bytes calldata sig) external {
    bytes32 h = keccak256(abi.encodePacked(msg.sender, amount));
    address signer = ecrecover(h, ...);
    require(signer == owner);
    // ... withdraw amount
}

A valid signature can be replayed forever — anyone who saw it once can re-submit it. Fix: include a per-user / per-message nonce:

mapping(address => uint256) public nonces;
function execute(uint256 amount, uint256 nonce, bytes calldata sig) external {
    require(nonce == nonces[msg.sender]);
    nonces[msg.sender]++;
    bytes32 h = keccak256(abi.encodePacked(msg.sender, amount, nonce));
    // ...
}

2. Missing chain ID → cross-chain replay

A signature valid on Ethereum mainnet shouldn't work on Optimism, Base, Arbitrum, etc. If chainid() not in the signed payload, signatures replay across chains:

// VULNERABLE
bytes32 h = keccak256(abi.encodePacked(amount, deadline, nonce));

// SAFE — EIP-712 domain separator includes chainid
bytes32 h = _hashTypedDataV4(...);  // OZ helper

This is especially bad for bridges — a signed message intended for chain A executes on chain B.

3. Signature malleability (ecrecover variants)

ecrecover accepts two valid s values for any signed message (s and -s mod n). This means each signature has two valid forms. If your contract uses the signature itself as a uniqueness key (e.g., usedSigs[sig] = true), an attacker can find the malleable version and bypass:

// VULNERABLE — uses sig as uniqueness key
mapping(bytes => bool) public used;
function execute(bytes calldata sig) external {
    require(!used[sig]);
    used[sig] = true;
    address signer = ecrecover(...);
    // ...
}

Fix: use the message hash (not the signature) as uniqueness key. Modern OZ ECDSA library rejects high-s values, but home-rolled ecrecover does not.

Read the full file on GitHub · 263 lines

Changes

What this file has done since we first saw it

Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.

  1. 9d ago First seen · 263 lines · 31 tokens per session scan A b557a3563f89

Subscribe to this mod's changes

signature-replay is a skill published in the GitHub repository MingyiSecLab/Mingyi-Atlas (11 stars, last pushed 2mo ago), licensed Apache-2.0. It adds 31 tokens to every session and 2,346 once invoked, about $0.0002 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. It is 100% identical to signature-replay, differing in 3 lines, and is treated as a copy.