Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add Minh-Tam-Solution/SDLC-Enterprise-Framework --skill sdlc-cross-reviewgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/Minh-Tam-Solution/SDLC-Enterprise-FrameworkWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/minh-tam-solution/sdlc-enterprise-framework/sdlc-cross-review)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/minh-tam-solution/sdlc-enterprise-framework/sdlc-cross-review"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/minh-tam-solution/sdlc-enterprise-framework/sdlc-cross-review/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/minh-tam-solution/sdlc-enterprise-framework/sdlc-cross-review"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/minh-tam-solution/sdlc-enterprise-framework/sdlc-cross-review.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00082 | $0.01178 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00033 | $0.00471 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00016 | $0.00236 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00008 | $0.00118 |
Grade A, and why
sdlc-cross-review scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 2d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
The source is not reproduced here
A licence we could not identify
The repository carries a LICENSE file, but it is custom or dual enough that GitHub cannot name it and neither can this catalogue. Unknown terms are not permission, so the body is not copied here. Read the licence at the source and decide for yourself.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 2d ago First seen · 46 lines · 82 tokens per session scan A e1dc22496523
sdlc-cross-review is a skill published in the GitHub repository Minh-Tam-Solution/SDLC-Enterprise-Framework (20 stars, last pushed 2d ago), with no licence file. It adds 82 tokens to every session and 1,178 once invoked, about $0.0003 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-09-28.
Other skills, from other repositories
anti-monolith-guard
Prevent mixed-responsibility modules and uncontrolled file growth. Use before adding behavior to a large or mixed-responsibility file, or when splitting one. Do not use for small, local edits to cohesive modules.
code-hygiene-refactor
Select a bounded, behavior-preserving cleanup batch. Use when removing duplication, dead code or stale files without changing behavior. Do not use for feature work or large restructurings (REFACTORINGGUIDE.md).
agent-aegis
Security and privacy review for a scoped change. Use when a change touches authentication, authorization, secrets, sensitive data or destructive actions. Do not use for general code review or dependency upgrades without a security surface.
codex-review
A manually triggered review procedure that checks completed code against a frozen specification, decision record, and project rules.
closed-remediation-review
A final, closed-scope check that verifies whether agreed fixes from an earlier adversarial review were applied correctly.
adversarial-review
A process for having several independent reviewers inspect the same project evidence and report possible problems. The main agent then decides which findings are valid against the project's official specifications.