developing-incremental-models

Guidance for building dbt incremental models, which update only new or changed data instead of rebuilding an entire data table.

In plain words
What is it for?
Use it to choose an update strategy, set and check unique keys, handle changing source data, test with a full refresh, and investigate failed merges.
Why use it?
It helps avoid incorrect results and unnecessary processing when data is appended, updated, partitioned, or arrives late.

Skill for Claude CodeCodex

Install

Getting it into your agent

One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.

agentmods
npx agentmods add skills/miptah21/skills/developing-incremental-models
Any agent
npx skills add miptah21/skills --skill developing-incremental-models
Clone the repo
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/miptah21/skills

Made for: Claude Code, Codex.

Per session 112 Skills are progressive disclosure: only the name and description are preloaded; the body loads when the skill is used.
When invoked 1,946 The whole file, excluding the scripts and references it only reads on demand.
Security scan A 0 findings. Scan, not verified.
Origin 94% copy Near-identical to another mod in the catalogue.
Token cost

What it costs to keep this loaded

Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.

ModelPer sessionOnce invoked
Fable 5 $0.00112 $0.01946
Opus 5 $0.00056 $0.00973
Sonnet 5 $0.00022 $0.00389
Haiku 4.5 $0.00011 $0.00195

Measured 2d ago against content hash 02d7b9241391, method: parsed. Prices are Anthropic first-party input rates as of 2026-08-30, from the pricing page.

Security

Grade A, and why

developing-incremental-models scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 2d ago.

A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.

Nothing flagged

None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.

Origin

This is a copy

94% identical to developing-incremental-models — 102 lines differ, which has more behind it and is treated as the original. This page carries a canonical link to it rather than competing with it.

.agents/skills/developing-incremental-models/SKILL.md · 239 lines

How it starts

The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 239 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.

Choose the right strategy. Design the unique_key carefully. Handle edge cases.

When to Use Incremental

Scenario Recommendation
Source data < 10M rows Use table (simpler, full refresh is fast)
Source data > 10M rows Consider incremental
Source data updated in place Use incremental with merge strategy
Append-only source (logs, events) Use incremental with append strategy
Partitioned warehouse data Use insert_overwrite if supported

Default to table unless you have a clear performance reason for incremental.

Critical Rules

  1. ALWAYS test with --full-refresh first before relying on incremental logic
  2. ALWAYS verify unique_key is truly unique in both source and target
  3. If merge fails 3+ times, check unique_key for duplicates
  4. Run full refresh periodically to prevent data drift

1. Confirm Incremental is Needed

# Check source table size
dbt show --inline "select count(*) from {{ source('schema', 'table') }}"

If count < 10 million, consider using table instead. Incremental adds complexity.

2. Understand the Source Data Pattern

Before choosing a strategy, answer:

  • Is data append-only? (new rows added, never updated)
  • Are existing rows updated? (need merge/upsert)
  • Is there a reliable timestamp? (for filtering new data)
  • What's the unique identifier? (for merge matching)
# Check for timestamp column
dbt show --inline "
  select
    min(updated_at) as earliest,
    max(updated_at) as latest,
    count(distinct date(updated_at)) as days_of_data
  from {{ source('schema', 'table') }}
"

3. Choose the Right Strategy

Strategy Use When How It Works
append Data is append-only, no updates INSERT only, no deduplication
merge Data can be updated MERGE/UPSERT by unique_key
delete+insert Data updated in batches DELETE matching rows, then INSERT
insert_overwrite Partitioned tables (BigQuery, Spark) Replace entire partitions

Read the full file on GitHub · 239 lines

Files

What ships with it

1 file beside SKILL.md in the same directory: the scripts, references and assets a skill reads on demand. Not counted in the per-session cost; read them before you install if any of them is executable.

Changes

What this file has done since we first saw it

Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.

  1. 2d ago First seen · 239 lines · 112 tokens per session scan A 02d7b9241391

Subscribe to this mod's changes

developing-incremental-models is a skill published in the GitHub repository miptah21/skills (2 stars, last pushed 3mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 112 tokens to every session and 1,946 once invoked, about $0.0006 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. It is 94% identical to developing-incremental-models, differing in 102 lines, and is treated as a copy.

Related

Other skills, from other repositories

systematic-debugging

Use when encountering any bug, test failure, or unexpected behavior, before proposing fixes.

obra/superpowers · 21 tokens

brainstorming

You MUST use this before any creative work - creating features, building components, adding functionality, or modifying behavior. Explores user intent, requirements and design before implementation.

obra/superpowers · 37 tokens

auto-perf-optimize

Run agent-driven VS Code performance or memory investigations. Use when asked to launch Code OSS, automate a VS Code scenario, run the Chat memory smoke runner, capture renderer heap snapshots, take workflow screenshots, compare run summaries, or drive a repeatable scenario before heap-snapshot analysis.

microsoft/vscode · 62 tokens

chat-perf

Run chat perf benchmarks and memory leak checks against the local dev build or any published VS Code version. Use when investigating chat rendering regressions, validating perf-sensitive changes to chat UI, or checking for memory leaks in the chat response pipeline.

microsoft/vscode · 51 tokens

chat-pet-sprite-creation

Use when creating or changing VS Code chat pet sprite art, sprite sheets, state animations, eye treatments, Stable/Insiders variants, or pet transitions under src/vs/workbench/contrib/chat/browser/widget/media/chatPet.

microsoft/vscode · 53 tokens

cpu-profile-analysis

Analyze V8/Chrome CPU profiles (.cpuprofile) and DevTools trace files (Trace-.json). Use when: profiling performance, investigating slow functions, comparing code paths, finding bottlenecks, analyzing timeToRequest, understanding call trees from sampling profiler data, analyzing layout/paint/rendering, investigating…

microsoft/vscode · 71 tokens