scrutinize

scrutinize is a skill for Claude Code from mishahanin/heading-os. It costs 189 tokens per session (4,454 once invoked), scanned A, original, Apache-2.0.

A manual quality-review gate for plans, completed work, files, directories, or a whole workspace. It checks for problems, challenges its own findings, and proposes fixes with confidence levels.

In plain words
What is it for?
Use it to review implementation plans, audit completed changes, inspect files, and run an adversarial check on reported issues.
Why use it?
It helps catch defects and questionable assumptions before a plan is approved or changes are accepted.

Skill for Claude Code

Written for Claude Code: allowed-tools in frontmatter. Also seen: reads .claude/ paths.

Good fit Use it to review implementation plans, audit completed changes, inspect files, and run an adversarial check on reported issues.

Compare 6 skills from other repositories ↓
Install with agentmods
npx agentmods add skills/mishahanin/heading-os/scrutinize
Install

Getting it into your agent

One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.

Any agent
npx skills add mishahanin/heading-os --skill scrutinize
Clone the repo
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/mishahanin/heading-os

Made for: Claude Code.

Wrote this? Show the measurements

A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.

agentmods badge for scrutinize

README.md
[![agentmods](https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/mishahanin/heading-os/scrutinize/github.svg)](https://agentmods.dev/skills/mishahanin/heading-os/scrutinize)
Your own site
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/mishahanin/heading-os/scrutinize"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/mishahanin/heading-os/scrutinize/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>

Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.

agentmods 80×15 button for scrutinize

Your own site · 80×15
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/mishahanin/heading-os/scrutinize"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/mishahanin/heading-os/scrutinize.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>
Per session 189 Skills are progressive disclosure: only the name and description are preloaded; the body loads when the skill is used.
When invoked 4,454 The whole file, excluding the scripts and references it only reads on demand.
Security scan A 0 findings. A grade says what 26 rules found in the file — not that it is safe.
Origin original No closer match found in the catalogue.
Token cost

What it costs to keep this loaded

Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.

ModelPer sessionOnce invoked
Fable 5.1 $0.00189 $0.04454
Opus 5.5 $0.00076 $0.01782
Sonnet 5.5 $0.00038 $0.00891
Haiku 4.5 $0.00019 $0.00445

Measured 1mo ago against content hash 51be3e998cde, method: parsed. Prices are Anthropic first-party input rates as of 2026-10-07, from the pricing page.

Security

Grade A, and why

scrutinize scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 1mo ago.

A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.

Nothing flagged

None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.

.claude/skills/scrutinize/SKILL.md · 272 lines

How it starts

The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 272 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.

Scrutinize

Manually-invoked quality gate. It runs a maximum-effort VIIA pass (Validate - Identify - Improve - Adjust) over a target. An adversarial layer then filters the false positives. Each finding carries a concrete fix and a confidence score, and the gate blocks progress until the user approves the batch.

Principal-engineer posture: find what is wrong, not what works. Every finding needs evidence. Every BLOCKER and HIGH survives a debate first. No shortcut exits. Version history: references/version-history.md.


Variables

One optional target plus the flags in references/flags.md, which Phase 0 step 1 already loads. That catalog is the source of truth. The one-line copies in argument-hint, x-heading-capability.how and x-heading-routing.label carry the same flags. tests/test_three_flag_lists_that_described_one_skill.py fails when a copy drifts from the catalog, or names a flag no code reads.


When to Engage

Manual invocation only.

Use it before approving a high-stakes plan, or after /implement to audit the changes against that plan. Use it on a file or a dir when something feels off, and periodically on the workspace to catch drift.

Do NOT use it for artifact grading (/evaluate), draft fact-checking (/validate), decision reasoning (/deep-think), or content-quality review of a post or an email (/evaluate).


Phase 0 - Context Loading

  1. Load every reference file under .claude/skills/scrutinize/references/. The directive is the directory, not a list: each file states what consumes it.

  2. Load applicable rules: .claude/rules/{development-standards,hidden-chars,security,classification,voice}.md.

  3. Resolve target per references/target-detection.md. Parse an explicit argument from the invocation when one is present. Otherwise apply the priority order plan > execution (git) > menu. Print a confirmation line for priorities 2 to 4 and wait for the user. Use the new target when they redirect you.

Read the full file on GitHub · 272 lines

Changes

What this file has done since we first saw it

Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.

  1. 1mo ago Changed 51be3e998cde
  2. 1mo ago Changed · +1 lines · +3 tokens per session ac123243ca23
  3. 1mo ago First seen · 271 lines · 186 tokens per session scan A 8810d174a189

Subscribe to this mod's changes

scrutinize is a skill published in the GitHub repository mishahanin/heading-os (11 stars, last pushed 1mo ago), licensed Apache-2.0. It adds 189 tokens to every session and 4,454 once invoked, about $0.0008 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-09-03.