Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add mishrasanjeev/grantex --skill expert-code-reviewgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/mishrasanjeev/grantexWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/mishrasanjeev/grantex/expert-code-review)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/mishrasanjeev/grantex/expert-code-review"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/mishrasanjeev/grantex/expert-code-review/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/mishrasanjeev/grantex/expert-code-review"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/mishrasanjeev/grantex/expert-code-review.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00050 | $0.00832 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00020 | $0.00333 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00010 | $0.00166 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00005 | $0.00083 |
Grade A, and why
expert-code-review scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 1mo ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
The source is not reproduced here
A licence we could not identify
The repository carries a LICENSE file, but it is custom or dual enough that GitHub cannot name it and neither can this catalogue. Unknown terms are not permission, so the body is not copied here. Read the licence at the source and decide for yourself.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 1mo ago First seen · 91 lines · 50 tokens per session scan A e2368e0eccfe
expert-code-review is a skill published in the GitHub repository mishrasanjeev/grantex (33 stars, last pushed today), with no licence file. It adds 50 tokens to every session and 832 once invoked, about $0.0002 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other skills, from other repositories
reviewing-plan-docs
Review planning documents by reading the plan docs and doing a thorough codebase walkthrough, then writing detailed review docs. Use when the user asks to review, audit, critique, or validate a plan, design doc, or spec in the permit0 repository.
security-review
Security Code Review: Reviews code for security vulnerabilities including authentication (OAuth2, JWT), authorization (RBAC, roles), API security, data protection, payment security, and common attack vectors. Use whenever the user wants a security review, penetration test analysis, threat model, or mentions OAuth2…
code-quality
Comprehensive code review for Java - clean code principles, API contracts, null safety, exception handling, and performance. Use when user says "review code", "refactor", "check API", or before merging changes.
compliance-checker
Check affiliate content for FTC compliance and platform rules. Triggers on: "check my content for compliance", "FTC disclosure check", "is this legal", "review for compliance", "check affiliate disclosure", "am I FTC compliant", "audit my content", "compliance review", "legal check", "platform rules check", "check…
self-improver
Review affiliate campaign results and improve strategy. Triggers on: "review my results", "what went wrong", "how to improve conversions", "analyze my campaign", "affiliate retrospective", "why am I not converting", "improve my strategy", "what should I change", "campaign review", "optimize my approach", "learn from…
reviewer
Code review - correctness, tests, merge-readiness.