write-vibe-design-doc

write-vibe-design-doc is a skill for Claude Code, Codex from mistralai/mistral-vibe. It costs 79 tokens per session (2,440 once invoked), scanned A, original, Apache-2.0.

A workflow for writing implementation-ready design proposals for Mistral Vibe, a coding-agent project. The proposals document the problem, design choices, alternatives, rollout, and checks for completion.

In plain words
What is it for?
Use it to propose Vibe features, migrations, protocol or API changes, runtime or storage changes, and cross-component workflows, usually as a document under docs/design.
Why use it?
It helps reviewers and implementers agree on the real code path and important decisions before substantial feature or system changes begin.

Skill for Claude CodeCodex ✓ vendor

Written for no agent in particular: nothing here depends on one. Also seen: mentions subagents; mentions AGENTS.md; $skill-name invocation.

Good fit Use it to propose Vibe features, migrations, protocol or API changes, runtime or storage changes, and cross-component workflows, usually as a document under docs/design.

Compare 6 skills from other repositories ↓
Install with agentmods
npx agentmods add skills/mistralai/mistral-vibe/write-vibe-design-doc
About the project

Mistral Vibe is a command-line coding assistant that lets users converse with a codebase and use natural language to explore or change projects. Developers use it for file editing, code searching, version-control tasks, and shell commands through Mistral’s models. Its catalogue add-ons provide skills and instructions for customizing the assistant’s workflows.

mistralai/mistral-vibe · 4,935 stars · on GitHub

Install

Getting it into your agent

One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.

Any agent
npx skills add mistralai/mistral-vibe --skill write-vibe-design-doc
Clone the repo
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/mistralai/mistral-vibe

Made for: Claude Code, Codex.

Wrote this? Show the measurements

A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.

agentmods badge for write-vibe-design-doc

README.md
[![agentmods](https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/mistralai/mistral-vibe/write-vibe-design-doc/github.svg)](https://agentmods.dev/skills/mistralai/mistral-vibe/write-vibe-design-doc)
Your own site
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/mistralai/mistral-vibe/write-vibe-design-doc"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/mistralai/mistral-vibe/write-vibe-design-doc/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>

Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.

agentmods 80×15 button for write-vibe-design-doc

Your own site · 80×15
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/mistralai/mistral-vibe/write-vibe-design-doc"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/mistralai/mistral-vibe/write-vibe-design-doc.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>
Per session 79 Skills are progressive disclosure: only the name and description are preloaded; the body loads when the skill is used.
When invoked 2,440 The whole file, excluding the scripts and references it only reads on demand.
Security scan A 0 findings. A grade says what 26 rules found in the file — not that it is safe. Third-party audits
  • NVIDIA SkillSpector warn 7 Sept 2026
SkillSpector: 1 finding, up to medium

These are SkillSpector’s own severities. On a checked sample its high-severity flags on skills were ~96% false positives — a documented command, a public API, a “never do X” rule — so we show them as a caution to read, not a verdict. Why →

  • medium Excessive Agency · line 133
    Skill enables autonomous high-impact decisions without human-in-the-loop verification. Critical operations (destructive commands, financial transactions, data deletion) should require explicit user confirmation.
    Fix: Add human-in-the-loop confirmation for destructive, irreversible, or high-impact operations. Never auto-execute commands that modify files, send data, or alter system state.
How audits are shown
Origin original No closer match found in the catalogue.
Token cost

What it costs to keep this loaded

Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.

ModelPer sessionOnce invoked
Fable 5.1 $0.00079 $0.02440
Opus 5 $0.00039 $0.01220
Sonnet 5 $0.00016 $0.00488
Haiku 4.5 $0.00008 $0.00244

Measured 12d ago against content hash a947b6e231d3, method: parsed. Prices are Anthropic first-party input rates as of 2026-09-11, from the pricing page.

Security

Grade A, and why

write-vibe-design-doc scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 12d ago.

A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.

Nothing flagged

None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.

.vibe/skills/write-vibe-design-doc/SKILL.md · 230 lines

How it starts

The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 230 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.

Write Vibe Design Doc

Produce a decision artifact that a reviewer can use to evaluate the proposal and an implementer can use as a completion checklist. Base it on product intent and the real code path, not on a plausible architecture invented from file names.

Design Doc Versus ADR

  • Write a design doc for proposed work, implementation choices, migrations, alternatives, rollout, and verification.
  • Use write-vibe-adr for a concise, durable architecture rule that future changes must follow. A design may require a new or updated ADR, but it does not replace one.
  • Unless the user also asks for implementation, stop after the reviewed design document. Do not make product-code changes implicitly.

Workflow

1. Establish scope and authority

  1. Identify the user outcome, affected surfaces, requested deliverable, and destination. Default new proposals to docs/design/<descriptive-slug>.md. Honor response-only or alternate-destination requests without creating a repository artifact.
  2. Collect named product specifications, issues, accepted decisions, and user corrections. Treat an explicitly named product source of truth as the target authority; use current code and ADRs to explain the starting point.
  3. Read README.md, AGENTS.md, the matching ADRs, and one or two nearby design documents. Read the nearest AGENTS.md before examining a sibling project.
  4. If the target direction conflicts with an ADR, flag the conflict and include the required ADR follow-up. Do not silently dilute either source.

When updating an existing proposal, preserve accepted decisions that the user has not changed. Apply each correction throughout the document instead of appending a new section that contradicts old routes, diagrams, ownership, failure semantics, or acceptance checks.

Ask only about a missing decision that would materially change the design. For example, clarify whether a command runs before startup or inside an active session when that choice changes which failures it can diagnose. Otherwise, state a bounded assumption and continue.

Read the full file on GitHub · 230 lines

Files

What ships with it

1 file beside SKILL.md in the same directory: the scripts, references and assets a skill reads on demand. Not counted in the per-session cost; read them before you install if any of them is executable.

Changes

What this file has done since we first saw it

Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.

  1. 12d ago First seen · 230 lines · 79 tokens per session scan A a947b6e231d3

Subscribe to this mod's changes

write-vibe-design-doc is a skill published in the GitHub repository mistralai/mistral-vibe (4,935 stars, last pushed today), licensed Apache-2.0. It adds 79 tokens to every session and 2,440 once invoked, about $0.0004 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.

Related

Other skills, from other repositories

systematic-debugging

Use when encountering any bug, test failure, or unexpected behavior, before proposing fixes.

obra/superpowers · 21 tokens

local-ai-agents

Build local-first AI agents that run entirely on a developer workstation with Microsoft Foundry Local and Qwen function-calling models. Covers Small Language Models (SLMs), the OpenAI-compatible local endpoint, sandboxed local tools, local RAG with Chroma, local MCP servers, hybrid cloud/local routing, and the…

microsoft/ai-agents-for-beginners · 200 tokens

next-cache-components-adoption

Turn on Cache Components in a Next.js app and resolve the blocking routes it surfaces. Use when the user wants to enable, adopt, or migrate to Cache Components, flip the cacheComponents flag, work through a flood of blocking-prerender / instant validation errors, run the cache-components-instant-false codemod, or…

vercel/next.js · 95 tokens

insight-error-page

Write or audit an insight-kind error page for the Next.js dev overlay. Use when creating a new errors/ .mdx page, auditing an existing one, or checking that a page matches the framework fix cards. Covers page structure, title alignment, FixCard cards with Copy prompt button, code snippets, terminology verification…

vercel/next.js · 83 tokens

next-cache-components-optimizer

Drive a Next.js route to instant navigation by setting up an agentic loop, under Cache Components / PPR, on initial load (hard navigation) and client-side navigation (soft navigation). Encode the goal as a failing @next/playwright instant() e2e and work it to green, one verified route at a time; the shipped test then…

vercel/next.js · 170 tokens

next-partial-prefetching-adoption

Turn on Partial Prefetching in a Next.js app and work through the insights it surfaces. Use when the user wants to enable or adopt Partial Prefetching, flip the partialPrefetching flag, opt routes in with export const prefetch = 'partial', audit Link prefetch={true} behavior, preserve existing prefetched UI with…

vercel/next.js · 103 tokens