Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add miyatti777/ai-plc --skill pm-hypothesisgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/miyatti777/ai-plcWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/miyatti777/ai-plc/pm-hypothesis)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/miyatti777/ai-plc/pm-hypothesis"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/miyatti777/ai-plc/pm-hypothesis/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/miyatti777/ai-plc/pm-hypothesis"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/miyatti777/ai-plc/pm-hypothesis.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00061 | $0.00245 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00024 | $0.00098 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00012 | $0.00049 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00006 | $0.00024 |
Grade A, and why
pm-hypothesis scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 2d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
What it actually says
Codex adapter: pm-hypothesis
- Codex実行環境の読み替えを読み、リポジトリルートの
.claude/skills/aipm-guided/ops/hypothesis.mdを最後まで読んで正本として使う。 - 正本の「使える Layer」の確かめ方・動き・進め方・守ることをそのまま守る。書く操作は試す→本人の確定→
--applyの順で、本人の確定なしに--applyしない。 /pm-*・/01-collection〜/04-operation・/plc-*は同名の$skillに読み替える。
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 2d ago First seen · 11 lines · 61 tokens per session scan A 4d6544745ee7
pm-hypothesis is a skill published in the GitHub repository miyatti777/ai-plc (49 stars, last pushed 2d ago), licensed MIT. It adds 61 tokens to every session and 245 once invoked, about $0.0002 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-10-23.
Other skills, from other repositories
adk-go-self-review
Review an ADK Go change the way a maintainer will — a fresh-context pass over the whole diff, five lenses (correctness and tests, scope, simplicity, style, adk-python parity), and the mutation check that proves your tests pin the change. Use before opening a PR, before any later push that changes code, and when asked…
adversarial-reviewer
Stress-test a code change for concrete correctness defects, unsafe assumptions, and failure modes. Use when the user explicitly asks for an adversarial review, a deep bug hunt, or to tear a change apart, or to check your own change before submitting it. Do not use for ordinary review, style feedback, or general…
go-testing
Trigger: Go tests, go test coverage, Bubbletea teatest, golden files. Apply focused Go testing patterns.
brooks-sweep
Full-sweep mode: runs a unified analysis across all quality dimensions — code decay, architecture, tech debt, and test quality — then applies fixes directly to the codebase. Safe changes are auto-applied; risky changes are confirmed before execution. Drawing on twelve classic engineering books. Triggers when: user…
semgrep-rule-variant-creator
Creates language variants of existing Semgrep rules. Use when porting a Semgrep rule to specified target languages. Takes an existing rule and target languages as input, produces independent rule+test directories for each language.
plugin-review
Review plugin quality with tiered checks and dependency scoping. Use for PR and pre-release audits.