Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add mizukaizen/hive-doctrine-mcp --skill stakeholder-mappinggit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/mizukaizen/hive-doctrine-mcpWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/mizukaizen/hive-doctrine-mcp/stakeholder-mapping)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/mizukaizen/hive-doctrine-mcp/stakeholder-mapping"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/mizukaizen/hive-doctrine-mcp/stakeholder-mapping/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/mizukaizen/hive-doctrine-mcp/stakeholder-mapping"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/mizukaizen/hive-doctrine-mcp/stakeholder-mapping.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00000 | $0.00496 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00000 | $0.00198 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00000 | $0.00099 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00000 | $0.00050 |
Grade A, and why
stakeholder-mapping scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 2mo ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 61 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Stakeholder Mapping Skill
Use when starting an engagement. Maps stakeholders by influence/interest, identifies champions and blockers.
When to Activate
- User asks to "map stakeholders" or "identify stakeholders"
- The
/new-engagementcommand is invoked - User mentions needing to understand "who matters" or "who to talk to"
Process
-
Identify stakeholders. From available context (engagement brief, org charts, meeting notes), list every person or role that could affect or be affected by the engagement.
-
Classify each stakeholder. For each, assess:
- Influence (High/Low): Can they approve, block, fund, or redirect the engagement?
- Interest (High/Low): Do they care about the outcome? Will it affect their work?
- Disposition (Champion/Neutral/Blocker): Are they supportive, indifferent, or resistant?
-
Plot the grid.
HIGH INTEREST
|
Keep Informed | Manage Closely
(champions live | (decision makers,
here often) | sponsors)
|
LOW INFLUENCE --------+-------- HIGH INFLUENCE
|
Monitor | Keep Satisfied
(minimal effort) | (brief updates,
| no surprises)
|
LOW INTEREST
-
Define engagement strategy. For each quadrant, specify:
- Communication frequency (weekly/fortnightly/monthly/as-needed)
- Communication format (meeting/email/report/dashboard)
- Key messages tailored to their concerns
- Risk if they are neglected
-
Identify dynamics.
- Who are the informal influencers (not in the org chart but respected)?
- Are there alliances or tensions between stakeholders?
- Who controls budget vs who controls access vs who controls narrative?
Output
A stakeholder map document saved to scope/stakeholder-map.md with:
- Stakeholder list with classifications
- 2x2 grid placement
- Engagement strategy per quadrant
- Key risks and mitigation for blocker stakeholders
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 2mo ago First seen · 61 lines · 0 tokens per session scan A 2c3c07add8df
stakeholder-mapping is a skill published in the GitHub repository mizukaizen/hive-doctrine-mcp (0 stars, last pushed 4mo ago), licensed MIT. It costs nothing until one of its globs matches a file; then it loads 496 tokens. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.
stakeholder-mapping compared with skills from other repositories
| Mod | Type | Stars | Last push | Licence | Scan | Tokens | Works with |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| stakeholder-mappingmizukaizen/hive-doctrine-mcp | Skill | 0 | 4mo ago | MIT | A | 0 | Claude Code, Codex |
| jev-desktopopenwong2kim/wmux | Skill | 448 | yesterday | MIT | A | 125 | Claude Code, Codex |
| agent-desktop-ffiopenwong2kim/wmux | Skill | 448 | yesterday | MIT | A | 122 | Claude Code, Codex |
| agent-desktopopenwong2kim/wmux | Skill | 448 | yesterday | MIT | A | 161 | Claude Code, Codex |
| agent-desktop-macosopenwong2kim/wmux | Skill | 448 | yesterday | MIT | A | 115 | Claude Code, Codex |
| agent-desktop-windowsopenwong2kim/wmux | Skill | 448 | yesterday | MIT | A | 119 | Claude Code, Codex |
| coding-agents-farmgriddynamics/rosetta | Skill | 373 | yesterday | Apache-2.0 | B | 32 | Claude Code |