architecture-review

architecture-review is a skill for Claude Code from mnthe/hardworker-marketplace. It costs 43 tokens per session (2,719 once invoked), scanned A, original, MIT.

A structured review of a software system's design. It examines component boundaries, separation of concerns, coupling, modularity, interfaces, scalability, and maintainability.

In plain words
What is it for?
Use it during planning to assess a proposed design and during verification to compare the implementation with that design. It helps review APIs, integration points, configuration, validation, errors, and logging.
Why use it?
It helps find design problems such as business logic mixed into user-interface code or database queries embedded in web routes. Early review can expose architectural risks before implementation is finished.

Skill for Claude Code

Written for Claude Code: user-invocable in frontmatter.

Part of the ultrawork plugin — 15 skills, 9 commands shipped together

Good fit Use it during planning to assess a proposed design and during verification to compare the implementation with that design. It helps review APIs, integration points, configuration, validation, errors, and logging.

Compare 6 skills from other repositories ↓
Install with agentmods
npx agentmods add skills/mnthe/hardworker-marketplace/architecture-review
Install

Getting it into your agent

One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.

Any agent
npx skills add mnthe/hardworker-marketplace --skill architecture-review
Clone the repo
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/mnthe/hardworker-marketplace

Made for: Claude Code.

Or install ultrawork, the plugin that ships this one along with the rest of its 15 skills, 9 commands.

Wrote this? Show the measurements

A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.

agentmods badge for architecture-review

README.md
[![agentmods](https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/mnthe/hardworker-marketplace/architecture-review/github.svg)](https://agentmods.dev/skills/mnthe/hardworker-marketplace/architecture-review)
Your own site
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/mnthe/hardworker-marketplace/architecture-review"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/mnthe/hardworker-marketplace/architecture-review/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>

Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.

agentmods 80×15 button for architecture-review

Your own site · 80×15
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/mnthe/hardworker-marketplace/architecture-review"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/mnthe/hardworker-marketplace/architecture-review.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>
Per session 43 Skills are progressive disclosure: only the name and description are preloaded; the body loads when the skill is used.
When invoked 2,719 The whole file, excluding the scripts and references it only reads on demand.
Security scan A 0 findings. A grade says what 26 rules found in the file — not that it is safe.
Origin original No closer match found in the catalogue.
Token cost

What it costs to keep this loaded

Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.

ModelPer sessionOnce invoked
Fable 5.1 $0.00043 $0.02719
Opus 5 $0.00022 $0.01359
Sonnet 5 $0.00009 $0.00544
Haiku 4.5 $0.00004 $0.00272

Measured 11d ago against content hash cc1c5128cdd4, method: parsed. Prices are Anthropic first-party input rates as of 2026-09-11, from the pricing page.

Security

Grade A, and why

architecture-review scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 11d ago.

A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.

Nothing flagged

None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.

plugins/ultrawork/skills/architecture-review/SKILL.md · 470 lines

How it starts

The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 470 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.

Architecture Review

Architecture and design pattern validation for ultrawork planning and verification phases.

What This Skill Provides

Structured approach to evaluating:

  • Component boundaries and separation of concerns
  • Modularity and coupling
  • Design patterns and architectural principles
  • Scalability and maintainability
  • API design and interfaces

When to Use This Skill

During PLANNING phase:

  • Reviewing planner's task decomposition
  • Validating design documents
  • Assessing technical approach
  • Identifying architectural risks

During VERIFICATION phase:

  • Ensuring implementation matches design
  • Checking component boundaries
  • Validating separation of concerns
  • Reviewing integration points

Core Principles

1. Separation of Concerns (SoC)

Checklist:

[ ] Business logic separated from presentation
[ ] Data access layer isolated
[ ] Authentication/authorization in dedicated modules
[ ] Configuration separate from code
[ ] API routes separate from business logic
[ ] Validation logic reusable across layers
[ ] Error handling centralized
[ ] Logging abstracted

Red Flags:

  • Business logic in React components
  • Database queries in route handlers
  • Authentication mixed with business logic
  • Configuration hardcoded in multiple files

Examples:

// ❌ Bad: Mixed concerns
app.post('/api/users', async (req, res) => {
  // Authentication + validation + business logic + DB access in one place
  if (!req.headers.authorization) return res.status(401).json({ error: 'Unauthorized' });
  if (!req.body.email) return res.status(400).json({ error: 'Email required' });
  const user = await db.users.create(req.body);
  res.json(user);
});

// ✅ Good: Separated concerns
app.post('/api/users',
  authenticate,           // Auth middleware
  validateCreateUser,     // Validation middleware
  createUserHandler       // Route handler delegates to service
);

async function createUserHandler(req, res) {
  const user = await userService.createUser(req.body); // Business logic in service
  res.json(user);
}

Read the full file on GitHub · 470 lines

Changes

What this file has done since we first saw it

Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.

  1. 11d ago First seen · 470 lines · 43 tokens per session scan A cc1c5128cdd4

Subscribe to this mod's changes

architecture-review is a skill published in the GitHub repository mnthe/hardworker-marketplace (4 stars, last pushed 4mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 43 tokens to every session and 2,719 once invoked, about $0.0002 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.