Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx agentmods add skills/moberghr/mtk-agent-toolkit/incremental-implementationnpx skills add moberghr/mtk-agent-toolkit --skill incremental-implementationgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/moberghr/mtk-agent-toolkitWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/moberghr/mtk-agent-toolkit/incremental-implementation)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/moberghr/mtk-agent-toolkit/incremental-implementation"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/moberghr/mtk-agent-toolkit/incremental-implementation.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5 | $0.00029 | $0.01162 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00015 | $0.00581 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00006 | $0.00232 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00003 | $0.00116 |
Grade A, and why
incremental-implementation scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 3d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 102 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Incremental Implementation
Overview
Implement in thin slices. Each slice must compile, test, and remain explainable before moving on. Use test-driven-development for the test strategy inside each slice and source-driven-development when framework behavior is uncertain.
When To Use
- Any approved multi-file implementation
- Refactors that still require verification
- Any task where the cost of late failure is high
When NOT To Use
- Single-file, single-function changes already minimal enough for the fix workflow
Workflow
- Before each batch, re-read the relevant rules from
CLAUDE.mdand the shared references. - Ask the simplicity question: what is the smallest correct implementation that could work?
- Implement only the files listed for the batch.
- Follow
test-driven-developmentfor tests in the same batch. - Use
source-driven-developmentwhen any framework, library, or SDK behavior is uncertain. - Run the batch checkpoint using the build and test commands from the active tech stack skill's
## Build & Test Commands. 6.5. Capture analyzer output. After the build command completes, pipe its output through the build diagnostics parser if available:
Surface any critical analyzer findings immediately — they block the batch just like build failures. Warning-level findings carry forward to the pre-commit review. If# Example for .NET (adapt command from tech stack skill's Build & Test Commands): dotnet build 2>&1 | tee /dev/tty | hooks/parse-build-diagnostics.sh > .mtk/analyzer-output.jsonhooks/parse-build-diagnostics.shdoes not exist in the installed toolkit, skip this step. - Read
.claude/references/pre-commit-review-list.mdif present and fix any violations immediately. - Mark the batch complete in
tasks/todo.md. Record the per-batch gate decision on the workflow artifact:scripts/workflow-artifact.sh gate "$MTK_WF_UUID" phase_exit_gate pass --reason "batch <id> green"(orfailto trigger remediation). See.claude/references/orchestration-gates.md. - Churn check: After completing each batch, run
git diff --statand count net lines changed. If cumulative changes across batches exceed 300 lines, pause and trigger an early review checkpoint:- Run the pre-commit review list if present
- Assess whether the scope is still within the approved manifest
- If changes exceed 500 lines without a review, stop and run
compliance-reviewerbefore continuing - This catches large unplanned changes mid-implementation rather than at the end
- After all batches, run the full test command from the tech stack and write an explicit behavioral diff.
- Append the
implementsection to the JSON handoff artifact atdocs/specs/<date>-<slug>.json. Schema:.claude/schemas/handoff.schema.json. Required keys:
Be honest about deviations —"implement": { "actual_files": ["..."], // git diff --name-only <base>...HEAD "completed_batches": ["B1","B2"], "deviations": [ { "kind": "extra-file", "detail": "src/Helper.cs", "justification": "needed to unblock B2; spec did not anticipate" } ], "behavioral_diff": "..." }spec-drift-detectionwill diffchange_manifestagainstactual_filesregardless. Runbash scripts/validate-handoff.sh docs/specs/<date>-<slug>.jsonto surface drift before handing off to review.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 3d ago First seen · 102 lines · 29 tokens per session scan A a31af68e0f70
incremental-implementation is a skill published in the GitHub repository moberghr/mtk-agent-toolkit (6 stars, last pushed 9d ago), licensed MIT. It adds 29 tokens to every session and 1,162 once invoked, about $0.0001 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.
Other skills, from other repositories
systematic-debugging
Use when encountering any bug, test failure, or unexpected behavior, before proposing fixes.
brainstorming
You MUST use this before any creative work - creating features, building components, adding functionality, or modifying behavior. Explores user intent, requirements and design before implementation.
auto-perf-optimize
Run agent-driven VS Code performance or memory investigations. Use when asked to launch Code OSS, automate a VS Code scenario, run the Chat memory smoke runner, capture renderer heap snapshots, take workflow screenshots, compare run summaries, or drive a repeatable scenario before heap-snapshot analysis.
chat-perf
Run chat perf benchmarks and memory leak checks against the local dev build or any published VS Code version. Use when investigating chat rendering regressions, validating perf-sensitive changes to chat UI, or checking for memory leaks in the chat response pipeline.
chat-pet-sprite-creation
Use when creating or changing VS Code chat pet sprite art, sprite sheets, state animations, eye treatments, Stable/Insiders variants, or pet transitions under src/vs/workbench/contrib/chat/browser/widget/media/chatPet.
cpu-profile-analysis
Analyze V8/Chrome CPU profiles (.cpuprofile) and DevTools trace files (Trace-.json). Use when: profiling performance, investigating slow functions, comparing code paths, finding bottlenecks, analyzing timeToRequest, understanding call trees from sampling profiler data, analyzing layout/paint/rendering, investigating…