Borrowing it
Nothing to install: this file belongs to moberghr/mtk-agent-toolkit. Take a copy, put it at the same path in your own repository, and replace the rules that are about this project with yours.
curl -O https://raw.githubusercontent.com/moberghr/mtk-agent-toolkit/main/.claude/skills/spec-drift-detection/SKILL.mdgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/moberghr/mtk-agent-toolkitWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/moberghr/mtk-agent-toolkit/spec-drift-detection)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/moberghr/mtk-agent-toolkit/spec-drift-detection"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/moberghr/mtk-agent-toolkit/spec-drift-detection/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/moberghr/mtk-agent-toolkit/spec-drift-detection"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/moberghr/mtk-agent-toolkit/spec-drift-detection.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>- NVIDIA SkillSpector warn
SkillSpector: 1 finding, up to medium
These are SkillSpector’s own severities. On a checked sample its high-severity flags on skills were ~96% false positives — a documented command, a public API, a “never do X” rule — so we show them as a caution to read, not a verdict. Why →
- medium Agent Snooping · line 202 Skill enumerates or reads other installed skills. Access to other skills' SKILL.md files or the skills directory reveals prompt instructions, capabilities, and secrets that should be invisible to peer skills.Fix: Remove all code or instructions that list or read other skills' files or directories. Skills should operate independently; cross-skill access is a privilege escalation.
What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00039 | $0.03129 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00016 | $0.01252 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00008 | $0.00626 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00004 | $0.00313 |
Grade A, and why
spec-drift-detection scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 16d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 224 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Spec-Drift Detection
Tool discipline: read-only —
Read/Grep/Globand read-onlyBash(git diff, the drift scripts). NeverEdit/Writecode or the spec; report drift, never fix it.
Overview
Verify that the implementation delivered what the spec promised — nothing more, nothing less. Drift between spec and implementation means the Phase 2.5 approval gate did not cover the final code, a compliance risk in regulated environments; detect divergence before review.
When To Use
- After implementation batches complete, before handing to
compliance-reviewerin Phase 4 - A spec manifest exists at
docs/specs/<date>-<slug>.jsonand the reviewer wants to confirm the declared scope was honored
When NOT To Use
- Quick fixes, typo fixes, or config updates that ran without a spec, or sessions where no spec manifest was ever produced
Workflow
-
Locate the spec manifest.
- Default: the latest
docs/specs/*.jsonon the current branch. - Override: accept an explicit path if the engineer supplies one.
- If no manifest exists, stop and report
BLOCKED — no spec manifest found; drift cannot be checked. Either generate one viaspec-driven-developmentor confirm this change is quick-fix scope.
- Default: the latest
-
Load the manifest schema fields:
scope— classification stringchange_manifest— array of{ path, action, purpose }public_contracts— array of{ kind, signature, change }success_criteria— array of{ id, description, verification }out_of_scope— array of stringssecurity_impact— enum string
-
Collect actual change data:
- Preferred (deterministic): run
bash scripts/validate-handoff.sh docs/specs/<date>-<slug>.jsonto compute file-level and security-impact drift against the manifest. Treat its output as authoritative for those axes. - If the handoff has an
implement.actual_filesarray, diff it againstchange_manifest[].pathdirectly — no git invocation needed. - Otherwise, fall back to
git diff --name-status <base>...HEAD. - For contract-level drift (not covered by the script): grep the diff for added/modified public contracts (controller routes, handler classes, exported functions, etc., per active tech stack).
- Preferred (deterministic): run
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 16d ago Changed · -12 lines 7794d8fd236d
- 1mo ago Changed · +15 lines ce1b7d7cb0d9
- 1mo ago Changed · -20 lines cf66755d78c1
- 2mo ago First seen · 241 lines · 39 tokens per session scan A 8f751afb3118
spec-drift-detection is a skill published in the GitHub repository moberghr/mtk-agent-toolkit (9 stars, last pushed 8d ago), licensed MIT. It adds 39 tokens to every session and 3,129 once invoked, about $0.0002 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.
Other skills, from other repositories
autoreview
Structured code review through the shared OpenClaw agent-skills installation.
omh-code-review
This is an OMH code-review workflow skill, projected for Agent Skills hosts (Claude Code, Codex, Cursor, opencode, OpenClaw, pi).
revdiff-plan
Review the last Codex assistant message (plan, analysis, or proposal) with inline annotations in a TUI overlay. Extracts the most recent response from Codex rollout files and opens it in revdiff for review and annotation. Activates on "revdiff-plan", "review plan with revdiff", "annotate plan", "review last response"…
explore-unknowns
Guide the user through a quadrant walk that maps the unknowns of a task — open by listing the known knowns, then work through known unknowns, unknown knowns, and unknown unknowns one stage at a time, ending with a complete four-quadrant map in the user's hands. Use when a request is ambiguous or underspecified, the…
re0-merge
Review and land an external contribution the way this suite does: gate it against the thesis, land it with the author's credit intact, complete a new skill rather than merging it raw, then approve, credit, and explain before closing. Use when reviewing a pull request, as any collaborator or maintainer, not only the…
asplos-writing-style
Use when drafting or revising ASPLOS prose — engineering the first two pages that rapid review actually reads, stating the cross-layer insight as one quotable sentence, structuring per-layer mechanism sections, writing bounded claims, and fitting everything into 11 self-contained pages that include figures and…