Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add modu-ai/cc-plugins --skill moai-workflow-testinggit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/modu-ai/cc-pluginsWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/modu-ai/cc-plugins/moai-workflow-testing)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/modu-ai/cc-plugins/moai-workflow-testing"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/modu-ai/cc-plugins/moai-workflow-testing/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/modu-ai/cc-plugins/moai-workflow-testing"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/modu-ai/cc-plugins/moai-workflow-testing.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00086 | $0.03802 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00034 | $0.01521 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00017 | $0.00760 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00009 | $0.00380 |
Grade A, and why
moai-workflow-testing scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 2mo ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
The source is not reproduced here
No licence file
A repository with no LICENSE is all rights reserved by default, so the body is not copied here. The metadata, the measurements and the link are.
What ships with it
43 files beside SKILL.md in the same directory: the scripts, references and assets a skill reads on demand. Not counted in the per-session cost; read them before you install if any of them is executable.
- modules/advanced-patterns.md 14 KB
- modules/ai-debugging.md 11 KB
- modules/automated-code-review.md 8.7 KB
- modules/automated-code-review/context7-integration.md 8.9 KB
- modules/automated-code-review/review-workflows.md 14 KB
- modules/automated-code-review/trust5-framework.md 8.7 KB
- modules/automated-code-review/trust5-framework/relevance-analysis.md 5.2 KB
- modules/automated-code-review/trust5-framework/safety-analysis.md 4.8 KB
- modules/automated-code-review/trust5-framework/scoring-algorithms.md 5.4 KB
- modules/automated-code-review/trust5-framework/timeliness-analysis.md 5.5 KB
- modules/automated-code-review/trust5-framework/truthfulness-analysis.md 4.2 KB
- modules/automated-code-review/trust5-framework/usability-analysis.md 4.4 KB
- modules/code-review/analysis-patterns.md 13 KB
- modules/code-review/core-classes.md 9.5 KB
- modules/code-review/tool-integration.md 12 KB
- modules/ddd-context7.md 8.6 KB
- modules/ddd-context7/advanced-features.md 15 KB
- modules/ddd-context7/analyze-preserve-improve.md 12 KB
- modules/ddd-context7/test-generation.md 18 KB
- modules/ddd-context7/test-patterns.md 11 KB
- modules/ddd/core-classes.md 12 KB
- modules/debugging/debugging-workflows.md 16 KB
- modules/debugging/error-analysis.md 13 KB
- modules/INDEX.md 9.3 KB
- modules/optimization.md 11 KB
- modules/performance-optimization.md 10 KB
- modules/performance-optimization/ai-optimization.md 9.1 KB
- modules/performance-optimization/bottleneck-detection.md 15 KB
- modules/performance-optimization/optimization-plan.md 11 KB
- modules/performance-optimization/profiler-core.md 8.8 KB
- modules/performance-optimization/real-time-monitoring.md 6.3 KB
- modules/performance/optimization-patterns.md 12 KB
- modules/performance/profiling-techniques.md 14 KB
- modules/quality-metrics.md 14 KB
- modules/refactoring/ai-workflows.md 18 KB
- modules/refactoring/patterns.md 16 KB
- modules/security-analysis.md 15 KB
- modules/smart-refactoring.md 8.8 KB
- modules/static-analysis.md 12 KB
- modules/trust5-validation.md 13 KB
- reference/playwright-best-practices.md 2.1 KB
- references/examples.md 18 KB
- references/reference.md 14 KB
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 2mo ago First seen · 297 lines · 86 tokens per session scan A 004f885ded60
moai-workflow-testing is a skill published in the GitHub repository modu-ai/cc-plugins (68 stars, last pushed 8mo ago), with no licence file. It adds 86 tokens to every session and 3,802 once invoked, about $0.0003 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other skills, from other repositories
adk-go-self-review
Review an ADK Go change the way a maintainer will — a fresh-context pass over the whole diff, five lenses (correctness and tests, scope, simplicity, style, adk-python parity), and the mutation check that proves your tests pin the change. Use before opening a PR, before any later push that changes code, and when asked…
adversarial-reviewer
Stress-test a code change for concrete correctness defects, unsafe assumptions, and failure modes. Use when the user explicitly asks for an adversarial review, a deep bug hunt, or to tear a change apart, or to check your own change before submitting it. Do not use for ordinary review, style feedback, or general…
go-testing
Trigger: Go tests, go test coverage, Bubbletea teatest, golden files. Apply focused Go testing patterns.
review-checklist
The team's checklist for reviewing a change to linkcheck. Use before you commit or open a pull request.
brooks-sweep
Full-sweep mode: runs a unified analysis across all quality dimensions — code decay, architecture, tech debt, and test quality — then applies fixes directly to the codebase. Safe changes are auto-applied; risky changes are confirmed before execution. Drawing on twelve classic engineering books. Triggers when: user…
plugin-review
Review plugin quality with tiered checks and dependency scoping. Use for PR and pre-release audits.