MoAI-ADK is a Go-based harness that organizes and verifies Claude Code work across planning, implementation, synchronization, and review stages. Developers use it to structure agentic coding tasks, apply quality gates, and route work across language models, while the catalogue entries extend its workflow with skills, hooks, commands, MCP servers, instructions, and settings.
Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add modu-ai/moai-adk --skill moai-ref-git-workflowgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/modu-ai/moai-adkWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/modu-ai/moai-adk/moai-ref-git-workflow)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/modu-ai/moai-adk/moai-ref-git-workflow"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/modu-ai/moai-adk/moai-ref-git-workflow/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/modu-ai/moai-adk/moai-ref-git-workflow"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/modu-ai/moai-adk/moai-ref-git-workflow.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>- NVIDIA SkillSpector warn
SkillSpector: 2 findings, up to high
These are SkillSpector’s own severities. On a checked sample its high-severity flags on skills were ~96% false positives — a documented command, a public API, a “never do X” rule — so we show them as a caution to read, not a verdict. Why →
- high Tool Misuse · line 143 Tool parameters are crafted to achieve unintended or unsafe behavior. Parameter abuse can bypass intended safety checks (e.g. shell=True, --force, dangerous glob patterns).Fix: Validate all tool parameters against an allowlist. Reject dangerous parameter values (shell=True, --force, -rf /) and use safe defaults.
- high Tool Misuse · line 144 Tool parameters are crafted to achieve unintended or unsafe behavior. Parameter abuse can bypass intended safety checks (e.g. shell=True, --force, dangerous glob patterns).Fix: Validate all tool parameters against an allowlist. Reject dangerous parameter values (shell=True, --force, -rf /) and use safe defaults.
What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00058 | $0.01753 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00023 | $0.00701 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00012 | $0.00351 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00006 | $0.00175 |
Grade A, and why
moai-ref-git-workflow scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 14d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 199 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Git Workflow Reference
Target Agent
manager-git - Applies these patterns directly to git operations, branch management, and PR creation.
Branch Strategy Patterns
GitHub Flow (Default for Most Projects)
main ─────────────────────────────────────────
└── feat/SPEC-XXX-description ──── PR ──→ merge
Rules:
mainis always deployable- Feature branches from
main - PR required for all merges
- Delete branch after merge
GitFlow (Complex Release Cycles)
main ──────────────────────────────────────────
└── develop ─────────────────────────────────
├── feature/SPEC-XXX ──── PR ──→ develop
└── release/v1.2.0 ────── PR ──→ main + develop
Trunk-Based (CI/CD Heavy)
main ──────────────────────────────────────────
└── short-lived branch (< 1 day) ──→ merge
Branch Naming Convention
| Pattern | Example | Use Case |
|---|---|---|
feat/SPEC-{ID}-{slug} |
feat/SPEC-AUTH-001-jwt-auth |
New feature |
fix/SPEC-{ID}-{slug} |
fix/SPEC-BUG-042-null-check |
Bug fix |
refactor/{slug} |
refactor/extract-auth-middleware |
Refactoring |
docs/{slug} |
docs/api-reference-update |
Documentation |
chore/{slug} |
chore/upgrade-dependencies |
Maintenance |
Conventional Commits Reference
| Type | When | Example |
|---|---|---|
feat |
New feature | feat(auth): add JWT refresh token flow |
fix |
Bug fix | fix(api): handle null user in profile endpoint |
refactor |
Code restructure | refactor(db): extract query builder |
test |
Test changes | test(auth): add login edge case tests |
docs |
Documentation | docs(api): update endpoint descriptions |
chore |
Maintenance | chore(deps): upgrade Go to 1.23 |
perf |
Performance | perf(query): add index for user lookup |
style |
Formatting | style: apply gofmt formatting |
ci |
CI/CD changes | ci: add GitHub Actions workflow |
revert |
Revert commit | revert: undo feat(auth) commit abc123 |
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 14d ago Changed 36f24400e70b
- 1mo ago First seen · 199 lines · 58 tokens per session scan A d074950369e8
moai-ref-git-workflow is a skill published in the GitHub repository modu-ai/moai-adk (1,236 stars, last pushed today), licensed Apache-2.0. It adds 58 tokens to every session and 1,753 once invoked, about $0.0002 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other skills, from other repositories
git-commit-helper
Generate conventional commit messages automatically. Use when user runs git commit, stages changes, or asks for commit message help. Analyzes git diff to create clear, descriptive conventional commit messages. Triggers on git commit, staged changes, commit message requests.
agentic-jujutsu
Quantum-resistant, self-learning version control for AI agents with ReasoningBank intelligence and multi-agent coordination.
github-automation
GitHub workflow automation, PR management, issue tracking, and code review coordination. Integrates with GitHub Actions and repository management. Use when: PR creation, code review, issue management, release automation, workflow setup. Skip when: local-only changes, non-GitHub repositories.
git-integration
Git commit patterns, formats, and conventions for GSD methodology. Provides atomic commits per task, structured commit messages, planning file commits, branch management, and milestone tag operations.
audit-trail
Full traceability from PRD to code commit through the CCPM spec-driven pipeline.
strict-tdd
Strict RED->GREEN->REFACTOR test-driven development with enforcement. Never write production code before a failing test. Atomic commits per TDD cycle.