Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add mollyretter/forward-deployed-engineer-toolkit --skill panel-reviewgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/mollyretter/forward-deployed-engineer-toolkitWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/mollyretter/forward-deployed-engineer-toolkit/panel-review)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/mollyretter/forward-deployed-engineer-toolkit/panel-review"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/mollyretter/forward-deployed-engineer-toolkit/panel-review.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>- NVIDIA SkillSpector pass
What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00116 | $0.07397 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00058 | $0.03698 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00023 | $0.01479 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00012 | $0.00740 |
Grade A, and why
panel-review scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 8d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 384 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
/panel-review — multi-agent code review with a dev approval gate
When to use
Open a PR. Run /panel-review <PR-number> from inside the consumer repo to fan three model agents over the diff and produce a structured, dev-approved review comment plus a durable audit-trail build log.
No-arg invocation (/panel-review) reviews the current branch's diff vs main. Useful when you want a panel pass before opening a PR.
Skip for: trivial doc-only PRs (overhead exceeds value), out-of-band reviews where you just want a quick scan rather than a posted review.
What it produces
Two artifacts:
-
<consumer-repo>/docs/build-logs/panel-review-pr-{N}.md— durable build log. PR metadata, all three agents' raw findings, the Sonnet confidence recheck adjustments, the polished comment, the dev decision, and a Retro section. Committed to the PR's head branch so it merges with the PR. If a review is rerun on the same PR, append-{ISO-date}to the filename rather than overwriting (e.g.panel-review-pr-5-2026-05-10.md). -
A posted PR review comment via
gh pr review, gated on explicit dev approval. One of two shapes only: an approve-with-summary (no blockers) or a request-changes-with-blockers. Questions and nits stay in the build log; they are not posted publicly by default.
Hard rules
-
Worktree on entry. The skill creates an isolated worktree on a new branch off the PR's head, then runs
gh pr checkout {N}inside it. Build log accumulates inside the worktree during the run and is committed to that branch before exit. -
3-agent fan-out, parallel. Spawn Opus, Sonnet, Haiku in parallel via the Task / Agent tool. Wait for all three before synthesizing.
-
Different prompts for the cheap model. Opus and Sonnet share a prompt focused on regression risk, security issues, and bugs. Haiku gets a different prompt focused on convention drift, naming, dead code, comment quality, and "does the diff match the PR description." This split keeps Opus and Sonnet's context free of style nits and gives Haiku a scope it handles well.
What ships with it
7 files beside SKILL.md in the same directory: the scripts, references and assets a skill reads on demand. Not counted in the per-session cost; read them before you install if any of them is executable.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 8d ago First seen · 384 lines · 116 tokens per session scan A 79bcd414f083
panel-review is a skill published in the GitHub repository mollyretter/forward-deployed-engineer-toolkit (9 stars, last pushed 16d ago), licensed MIT. It adds 116 tokens to every session and 7,397 once invoked, about $0.0006 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.
Other skills, from other repositories
audit-pr
Audit a whole PR against the delivery contract and return MERGE-READY or evidenced blockers with the full URL. Consumes the current review-change REVIEW-PASS receipt instead of re-running review axes; posts a SHA-bound ready comment; never edits or merges. Triggers: "audit-pr", "is this PR ready", "merge gate".
review-change
Review a change with only applicable internal axes, classify every finding, persist fix-now work, and return one evidence-backed decision. Findings only; --adversarial N uses isolated reviewers; --synthesize fuses supplied reviewer tables. Triggers: "review-change", "review this change", "adversarial review".
review-plan
Independent read-only review of a frozen Engineering plan before execution, in a context that did not cut it: feature or fix snapshot, obligation ledger sweep, phase and validator checks. Returns only PLAN-REVIEW-PASS or PLAN-REVIEW-FAIL with a snapshot-bound receipt (a product-intent gap is PLAN-REVIEW-FAIL with…
fold-findings
Repair persisted fix-now findings in compatible atomic batches: root-cause fixes, green gate, commit/push, and per-row folded: yes updates. Never reclassify or substitute backlog notes. Triggers: "fold-findings", "fix the review findings", "repair audit blockers".
review-code
Internal correctness + simplification review pass of the agentic-workflow review pack — composed in-turn by review-change and product-audit; not a menu entry. Checks correctness, error handling, duplication, dead code, and simplification opportunities against the project's own conventions. Findings only; never edits…
review-perf
Internal performance review pass of the agentic-workflow review pack — composed in-turn by review-change and product-audit; not a menu entry. Checks the changed paths for algorithmic and resource regressions: N+1s, hot-path allocations, asset weight, and leaks. Findings only; never edits code.