Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add morodomi/tdd-skills --skill quality-gategit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/morodomi/tdd-skillsWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/morodomi/tdd-skills/quality-gate)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/morodomi/tdd-skills/quality-gate"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/morodomi/tdd-skills/quality-gate/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/morodomi/tdd-skills/quality-gate"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/morodomi/tdd-skills/quality-gate.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00034 | $0.00699 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00017 | $0.00349 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00007 | $0.00140 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00003 | $0.00070 |
Grade A, and why
quality-gate scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 9d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
What it actually says
Quality Gate
コード変更を6つの専門エージェントで並行レビューする。
Progress Checklist
quality-gate Progress:
- [ ] 対象範囲決定（引数解釈）
- [ ] スコープ/プラグイン確認
- [ ] レビュー実行（Subagent + Sonnet）
- [ ] 結果統合・スコア判定
- [ ] 分岐判定（PASS/WARN/BLOCK）
Workflow
Step 1: 対象範囲決定
引数に応じて対象範囲を決定:
| 引数 | 対象 |
|---|---|
| なし | 差分のみ（git diff HEAD） |
全部 --all |
全ファイル |
| ディレクトリ名 | 特定ディレクトリ |
# デフォルト
git diff HEAD --name-only
詳細: reference.md
Step 2: スコープ/プラグイン確認
Cycle doc から言語プラグインを確認:
ls -t docs/cycles/*.md 2>/dev/null | head -1 | xargs grep -A2 "### Scope"
| Plugin | 参照内容 |
|---|---|
| tdd-php | Testing Strategy（No RefreshDatabase等） |
| tdd-flask | Flask固有パターン |
| tdd-python | pytest/mypy設定 |
| tdd-js | ESLint/Jest設定 |
Step 3: レビュー実行
Subagent + Sonnet で並行実行。手順: steps-subagent.md
Step 4: 結果統合
各エージェントの信頼スコアを集計:
| 最大スコア | 判定 | アクション |
|---|---|---|
| 80-100 | BLOCK | 修正必須、進行不可 |
| 50-79 | WARN | 警告表示、継続可能 |
| 0-49 | PASS | 問題なし |
Step 5: 分岐判定
PASS（スコア49以下）
→ COMMITフェーズへ自動進行
WARN（スコア50-79）
警告があります。確認してください。
1. 警告を確認してCOMMIT
2. GREENに戻って修正
BLOCK（スコア80以上）
重大な問題が検出されました。
→ GREENに戻って修正してください
（Progress Logに記録済み）
Cycle docのProgress Logに以下の形式で追記する:
- YYYY-MM-DD HH:MM [REVIEW] quality-gate BLOCK (score NN): reviewer「指摘要約」
Reference
- エージェント定義:
../../agents/
What ships with it
2 files beside SKILL.md in the same directory: the scripts, references and assets a skill reads on demand. Not counted in the per-session cost; read them before you install if any of them is executable.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 9d ago First seen · 96 lines · 34 tokens per session scan A cbdec2b65a4d
quality-gate is a skill published in the GitHub repository morodomi/tdd-skills (8 stars, last pushed 6mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 34 tokens to every session and 699 once invoked, about $0.0002 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.
Other skills, from other repositories
autoreview
Pre-commit/ship code review: Codex default; optional Claude or Pi.
rework-rate
Measure and interpret PR rework rate — the emerging 5th DORA metric.
omh-code-review
This is a Hermes-native code-review workflow skill.
revdiff-plan
Review the last Codex assistant message (plan, analysis, or proposal) with inline annotations in a TUI overlay. Extracts the most recent response from Codex rollout files and opens it in revdiff for review and annotation. Activates on "revdiff-plan", "review plan with revdiff", "annotate plan", "review last response"…
code-reviewer
Code review specialist focused on patterns, bugs, security, and performance.
agent-teams-simplify-and-harden
Implementation + audit loop using parallel agent teams with structured simplify, harden, and document passes. Spawns implementation agents to do the work, then audit agents to find complexity, security gaps, and spec deviations, then loops until code compiles cleanly, all tests pass, and auditors find zero issues or…