Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add Mozurok/fhorja.dev --skill screen-spec-fleetgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/Mozurok/fhorja.devWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/mozurok/fhorja.dev/screen-spec-fleet)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/mozurok/fhorja.dev/screen-spec-fleet"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/mozurok/fhorja.dev/screen-spec-fleet/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/mozurok/fhorja.dev/screen-spec-fleet"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/mozurok/fhorja.dev/screen-spec-fleet.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00118 | $0.06172 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00059 | $0.03086 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00024 | $0.01234 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00012 | $0.00617 |
Grade A, and why
screen-spec-fleet scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 6d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
This is a copy
86% identical to component-spec — 166 lines differ, which has more behind it and is treated as the original. This page carries a canonical link to it rather than competing with it.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 218 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Output contract, in brief. This body is over the per-skill re-injection cap, so after a compaction the sections below are truncated away while this summary survives. They remain authoritative in full; re-read this file before emitting if you need them.
Standard output layout (required): Produce the command output using this structure (English only):Artifact changes: Follow## Global output contractinWORKFLOW_OPERATING_SYSTEM.mdforAPPLIED/PROPOSED/SKIPrules.Command transcript: Brief audit trail (max 4 lines; max 3 in no-op runs withNO_OP_TRACE).Handoff: Use the adaptive ending format fromWORKFLOW_OPERATING_SYSTEM.md## Global output contract(Mode A compact or Mode B full per...Definition of done (command output): Every manifest entry has exactly one spec file written underdocs/app/screens/<persona>/<NN>-<slug>.md.
Act as a senior/staff design system orchestrator dispatching N screen-spec-author sub-agents (one per screen) and synthesizing their partials into the canonical SCREEN_MAP.md index and routes.md table.
Goal:
For a batch of N >= 6 Figma frames from one persona+journey scope, dispatch N Sonnet workers in parallel; each worker runs the full 12-step screen-spec flow for ONE screen and writes its spec file directly under docs/app/screens/<persona>/<NN>-<slug>.md. The orchestrator then merges per-worker SCREEN_MAP rows and any new route declarations into the substrate index files. Expected wall-clock reduction vs sequential screen-spec: ~N/3 (Figma MCP calls dominate; partial parallelism in MCP throttling). Expected token reduction: ~2x (workers share no cross-screen context).
Mandatory context bootstrap (before any output):
- Read these sections in
WORKFLOW_OPERATING_SYSTEM.mdfirst:## LLM execution contract## Editor mode policy(mode definitions only; the tool mapping table is lazy-loaded inwos/editor-mode-mappings.mdand needed only for non-Claude-Code tools)## Global output contract(including Adaptive handoff and Mode selection rule)## Cross-cutting workflow guardrails
- Bootstrap tiers (ADR-0025): the light-weight commands (
branch-commit,what-next,where-we-at,slice-closure,compact-task-memory) may skip## Editor mode policygood-fits lists and## Cross-cutting workflow guardrailssequencing heuristics, reading only the mode definitions and the core guardrail rules (routing memory, command-less input triage, official command names, material change, no-op). The full tier is measured at 10530 tokens: the combined size of the four always-readWORKFLOW_OPERATING_SYSTEM.mdsections listed above. That figure is asserted here in prose and no gate recomputes it, so it drifts every time the spec grows: it was declared at 9610 and measured at 10530 on 2026-08-10, a 9.6 per cent gap, and it will drift again unless re-measured with the same method (sum the four^##sections, chars over 4). The reduced tier is a self-declared estimate of about 3,500 tokens for the trimmed subset above; it has not been independently re-measured by the same method, and should be read as an estimate rather than a fresh figure. The same reduced tier extends to the high-frequency execution commandsimplement-approved-sliceandsync-task-state(v3 wave1 item D: the most-invoked commands pay the bootstrap most often;state-reconciledeliberately stays on the full tier, cross-artifact judgment needs the full guardrail context). - Cache-amortized layer (ADR-0006): this bootstrap floor was DESIGNED as a cache-amortized cost rather than a per-command tax. ADR-0139 measured that the amortization is real but NOT controllable from here: the harness manages caching itself, there is no per-file or per-segment caching, and a command body is injected as a user message after the cached prefix. Whether this floor is cached is a property of the host, not of anything this repository can mark. Treat the figure below as a real per-invocation cost when reasoning about what a command carries. It sits in the prompt cache for the session and is paid at write cost once per cache TTL window, then at roughly 0.1x on cached reads inside that window. Account for it separately from any per-skill Load budget (the generated
.claude/skills/<name>/SKILL.mdbody); the two are different layers and should not be summed into one figure. - Session bootstrap reuse (skip-if-unchanged; v3 wave1 item D): WHEN this same conversation already performed this bootstrap read in an earlier turn that is still VISIBLE in the current context window AND
WORKFLOW_OPERATING_SYSTEM.mdhas not changed since, the command MAY skip the re-read and cite the earlier one instead, emitting one Command transcript line:Bootstrap: reusing turn <N> read, WOS unchanged. This is a scoped exception to the context-budget re-fetch rule (wos/context-budget.md, "The re-fetch rule"), justified because the bootstrap sections are one large, static, byte-identical read repeated every turn rather than a variable tool result; the re-fetch rule still governs every other tool result without exception. VISIBLE means the bootstrap section text itself is still present and quotable in the window right now, not merely that the record of an earlier read exists. On a harness that clears, a tool result can be emptied while the record that the tool ran survives (ADR-0114); a command that finds only that record, without the section text still readable, has not satisfied VISIBLE and must re-read. Self-declared memory after a compaction never qualifies (re-read instead), and a stateless-per-turn harness is excluded. The auditable-skip rule applies: the transcript line is mandatory; a silent skip is invalid output. - Resolving a relative
wos/<topic>.md. Try the canonical workflow repository root FIRST, then the installed docs directory (~/.claude/workflow-docs/wos/or~/.cursor/workflow-docs/wos/). Name the root you resolved against in### Command transcript, and say so explicitly when NEITHER resolved rather than continuing silently: several of these loads are declared MANDATORY, and a lazy load that resolved nowhere is otherwise indistinguishable in the output from one that was never needed. Repository first, because the installed copy is a snapshot that no sync prunes: preferring it would make an edit towos/invisible to every command until someone re-ran the installer. - Read additional sections only when relevant to this command's role.
- Read the
commands/directory command inventory to ensure command names and availability are current. - Align all routing recommendations and next-command suggestions with the current command set.
- Official next-command names only: every recommended next command (including the handoff
Run nowline) MUST be the basename of an existingcommands/<name>.mdfile in this workflow repository. Never invent names. One exception:Run now: nonewithMode: N/Adeclares that the chain has ended and no following command would be honest, defined in## Global output contract(ADR-0126); use it only when nothing honest remains, never to end a chain that has a real next step.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 6d ago First seen · 218 lines · 118 tokens per session scan A e6b6e3e85e0d
screen-spec-fleet is a skill published in the GitHub repository Mozurok/fhorja.dev (6 stars, last pushed 24d ago), licensed MIT. It adds 118 tokens to every session and 6,172 once invoked, about $0.0006 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. It is 86% identical to component-spec, differing in 166 lines, and is treated as a copy.
Other skills, from other repositories
ijfw-ui-spec
Use when the user says: 'ui spec', 'design contract', 'ui audit setup', 'lock the design', 'visual contract', 'ui review setup', or '/ijfw-ui-spec'. Produces UI-SPEC.md as the visual design contract before any frontend or visual-artifact build, and dispatches ijfw-ui-auditor as the final 6-pillar gate.
ijfw-design
Use when the user says: 'design', 'redesign', 'UI', 'UX', 'dashboard', 'page', 'component', 'make it look better', 'polish', 'pretty', 'professional', 'user experience', 'layout', 'visual', 'accessibility', 'colors', 'typography', 'brand'.
design-maker
name: design-maker description: Used when the Design Brief is complete and the user needs to generate mockups. Reads Product-Spec.md and Design-Brief.md, then generates a complete set of design deliverables through a design tool MCP, including all pages, state variants, component specifications, design tokens…
design-brief-builder
name: design-brief-builder description: Used when the user wants to define a design style or visual direction, or says something vague like 'I want a premium/sleek/modern look'. Guides the user through a design interview to clarify visual preferences and outputs Design-Brief.md. After Brief is saved, MUST run Next…
ui-designer
Designs and builds interface work on top of the design system the repo already has: layout, spacing, hierarchy, interaction states, and accessible defaults, with creativity calibrated to the surface instead of an unrequested redesign. Use when asked for a new screen, a redesign, empty, loading, and error states, or to…
brand-visual-quality
A quality-review workflow for brand visual assets such as logos, icons, theme variants, small-size optical adjustments, and monochrome masters.