design-brief-builder

design-brief-builder is a skill for Claude Code from zxpmail/ReqForge. It costs 0 tokens per session (1,887 once invoked), scanned A, original, MIT.

A guided process for defining a product's visual style and visual direction, such as layout preferences, colours, and overall feel. It records the decisions in a Design-Brief.md file for design and development work.

In plain words
What is it for?
Use it before creating mockups when you need to clarify a product's visual direction or document design preferences.
Why use it?
It turns vague requests such as “make it modern” into clear, usable design guidance. It also identifies when a product specification or design tool is missing.

Skill for Claude Code

Written for Claude Code: installed under .claude/.

Needs its repository: it reads a path above its own folder, which exists only inside the repository. The line is ../_shared/.

Good fit Use it before creating mockups when you need to clarify a product's visual direction or document design preferences.

Compare 6 skills from other repositories ↓
Install

Getting it into your agent

It runs from inside its repository, so the clone comes first — what it calls does not travel with the file alone.

Clone the repo
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/zxpmail/ReqForge
agentmods
npx agentmods add skills/zxpmail/reqforge/design-brief-builder

Made for: Claude Code.

Wrote this? Show the measurements

A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.

agentmods badge for design-brief-builder

README.md
[![agentmods](https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/zxpmail/reqforge/design-brief-builder/github.svg)](https://agentmods.dev/skills/zxpmail/reqforge/design-brief-builder)
Your own site
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/zxpmail/reqforge/design-brief-builder"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/zxpmail/reqforge/design-brief-builder/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>

Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.

agentmods 80×15 button for design-brief-builder

Your own site · 80×15
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/zxpmail/reqforge/design-brief-builder"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/zxpmail/reqforge/design-brief-builder.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>
Per session 0 Skills are progressive disclosure: only the name and description are preloaded; the body loads when the skill is used.
When invoked 1,887 The whole file, excluding the scripts and references it only reads on demand.
Security scan A 0 findings. A grade says what 26 rules found in the file — not that it is safe. Third-party audits
  • NVIDIA SkillSpector warn 7 Sept 2026
SkillSpector: 6 findings, up to high

These are SkillSpector’s own severities. On a checked sample its high-severity flags on skills were ~96% false positives — a documented command, a public API, a “never do X” rule — so we show them as a caution to read, not a verdict. Why →

  • high Prompt Injection · line 1
    Hidden instructions were detected in comments or invisible text. These could contain malicious directives. Manual review is recommended.
    Fix: Audit all comments and invisible characters. Remove any instructions that direct the agent to perform unauthorized actions. Use plain, reviewable content.
  • high Prompt Injection · line 80
    Hidden instructions were detected in comments or invisible text. These could contain malicious directives. Manual review is recommended.
    Fix: Audit all comments and invisible characters. Remove any instructions that direct the agent to perform unauthorized actions. Use plain, reviewable content.
  • high Prompt Injection · line 92
    Hidden instructions were detected in comments or invisible text. These could contain malicious directives. Manual review is recommended.
    Fix: Audit all comments and invisible characters. Remove any instructions that direct the agent to perform unauthorized actions. Use plain, reviewable content.
  • high Prompt Injection · line 92
    Hidden instructions were detected in comments or invisible text. These could contain malicious directives. Manual review is recommended.
    Fix: Audit all comments and invisible characters. Remove any instructions that direct the agent to perform unauthorized actions. Use plain, reviewable content.
  • high Prompt Injection · line 121
    Hidden instructions were detected in comments or invisible text. These could contain malicious directives. Manual review is recommended.
    Fix: Audit all comments and invisible characters. Remove any instructions that direct the agent to perform unauthorized actions. Use plain, reviewable content.
  • medium Excessive Agency · line 24
    Skill enables autonomous high-impact decisions without human-in-the-loop verification. Critical operations (destructive commands, financial transactions, data deletion) should require explicit user confirmation.
    Fix: Add human-in-the-loop confirmation for destructive, irreversible, or high-impact operations. Never auto-execute commands that modify files, send data, or alter system state.
How audits are shown
Origin original No closer match found in the catalogue.
Token cost

What it costs to keep this loaded

Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.

ModelPer sessionOnce invoked
Fable 5.1 $0.00000 $0.01887
Opus 5.5 $0.00000 $0.00755
Sonnet 5.5 $0.00000 $0.00377
Haiku 4.5 $0.00000 $0.00189

Measured 1mo ago against content hash 32b6ae32bc62, method: parsed. Prices are Anthropic first-party input rates as of 2026-10-07, from the pricing page.

Security

Grade A, and why

design-brief-builder scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 1mo ago.

A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.

Nothing flagged

None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.

adapters/claude-code/.claude/skills/design-brief-builder/SKILL.md · 154 lines

How it starts

The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 154 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.


name: design-brief-builder description: Used when the user wants to define a design style or visual direction, or says something vague like 'I want a premium/sleek/modern look'. Guides the user through a design interview to clarify visual preferences and outputs Design-Brief.md. After Brief is saved, MUST run Next Step Gate and recommend /design-maker — do not silently end the design phase. version: 1.2.1 updated: 2026-06-21 requires: []

[Task] Through a designer-interviews-client approach, guide the user to define the product's visual direction and output a well-structured Design-Brief.md that can be used both by design tools and by dev-builder for coding.

[Not For] - Generating actual mockups or design files -> use /design-maker instead - Writing code -> use /dev-builder instead - Defining product features -> use /product-spec-builder instead

[Dependency Check] Automatically executed as the first step when the Skill starts:

Required:
- Product-Spec.md → If missing, prompt the user to call /product-spec-builder first

Optional (fallback mode):
- Design tool MCP → If not connected, mark as "manual design mode". The Design Brief is still generated, and the user feeds it to the design tool on their own.

[First Principles] Brief 前必读 references/first-principles.md

[Shared Discipline] Karpathy 四原则 → ../_shared/karpathy-discipline.md(Web-First / 不猜)

[Output Style] → references/output-style.md(设计师访谈人格)

[File Structure] design-brief-builder/ ├── SKILL.md ├── commands/design-brief-builder.md ├── templates/design-brief-template.md └── references/ ├── first-principles.md ├── output-style.md ├── workflow.md # 四阶段完整流程(必读) ├── interview-dimension-checklist.md ├── interview-strategies.md ├── sufficiency-judgment.md ├── design-discovery-questionnaire.md ├── visual-direction-presets.md ├── anti-ai-slop-checklist.md └── anti-rationalization.md ../_shared/

[Gotchas] Open-ended questions instead of choices: Always give concrete options (Linear or Notion? Dark or light?). Relying on memory for design trends: WebSearch before recommending. Skipping accessibility: Contrast, hierarchy, touch targets belong in Brief. Copying without thinking: Adapt reference products; don't clone blindly. Missing refinement preference: Ask whether the user wants a single delivery or graduated tiers (layout → interaction → edge cases). Gradual refinement catches structural issues early when they're cheap to fix. No-UI products: If Product-Spec has no UI Layout / API-only / library — do not run full interview or mockup Gate; see references/surface-routing.md.

[Anti-Rationalization Checklist] → references/anti-rationalization.md 遇 skipping interview / skipping WebSearch 等场景时读取。

[Output Artifacts] - Design-Brief.md — Design specification document containing mood direction, color direction, information density, interaction style, etc. - .forge/design-next-step.json — User's post-Brief choice (mockup / skip / planner-first); required before closing session when not invoking design-maker immediately

[Next Step Gate — HARD-GATE] Brief 落盘后 MUST 先读 references/surface-routing.md: - 无 UI(C 类) → 不跑 Gate;design-next-step.json + 推荐 /dev-planner - 有 UI(A 类) → 执行 references/next-step-gate.md(三选一,推荐 mockup) - 轻 CLI(B 类) → 简化 Gate,不推荐 design-maker

Read the full file on GitHub · 154 lines

Changes

What this file has done since we first saw it

Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.

  1. 1mo ago First seen · 154 lines · 0 tokens per session scan A 32b6ae32bc62

Subscribe to this mod's changes

design-brief-builder is a skill published in the GitHub repository zxpmail/ReqForge (18 stars, last pushed 15d ago), licensed MIT. It costs nothing until one of its globs matches a file; then it loads 1,887 tokens. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.

Related

Other skills, from other repositories

ui-mockup

Create UI mockups at three fidelity levels — ASCII wireframes for quick iteration, standalone HTML mockups for delivery with requirements, and live prototypes for interaction testing.

mvschwarz/openrig · 37 tokens

oma-design

Define or review a visual system, DESIGN.md, or redesign direction. Use for typography, layout, color, motion, and interaction design decisions.

first-fluke/oh-my-agent · 32 tokens

ijfw-ui-spec

Use when the user says: 'ui spec', 'design contract', 'ui audit setup', 'lock the design', 'visual contract', 'ui review setup', or '/ijfw-ui-spec'. Produces UI-SPEC.md as the visual design contract before any frontend or visual-artifact build, and dispatches ijfw-ui-auditor as the final 6-pillar gate.

FerroxLabs/ijfw · 83 tokens

ijfw-design

Use when the user says: 'design', 'redesign', 'UI', 'UX', 'dashboard', 'page', 'component', 'make it look better', 'polish', 'pretty', 'professional', 'user experience', 'layout', 'visual', 'accessibility', 'colors', 'typography', 'brand'.

FerroxLabs/ijfw · 72 tokens

design

Design and critique any visible UI, before and after building. Trigger on UI work: "improve the UI", "redesign", "polish", "make it look better", "visual upgrade", "design review", "design audit", "layout fix", "UX improvement", or any task whose deliverable is a page, screen, or component that renders. Shapes a…

getpapi/papi · 121 tokens

design-bootstrap

Bootstrap a design system from a Figma file via MCP: extract token variables, identify components, scaffold foundation docs and a component inventory. Use when starting a new project with a Figma file. Do not use when docs exist or there is no Figma file.

Mozurok/fhorja.dev · 56 tokens