Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add mrclrchtr/supi --skill resolving-merge-conflictsgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/mrclrchtr/supiWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/mrclrchtr/supi/resolving-merge-conflicts)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/mrclrchtr/supi/resolving-merge-conflicts"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/mrclrchtr/supi/resolving-merge-conflicts/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/mrclrchtr/supi/resolving-merge-conflicts"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/mrclrchtr/supi/resolving-merge-conflicts.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00023 | $0.00204 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00009 | $0.00082 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00005 | $0.00041 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00002 | $0.00020 |
Grade A, and why
resolving-merge-conflicts scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 1mo ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
This is a copy
84% identical to resolve-merge-conflict — 12 lines differ, which has more behind it and is treated as the original. This page carries a canonical link to it rather than competing with it.
What it actually says
-
See the current state of the merge/rebase. Check git history, and the conflicting files.
-
Find the primary sources for each conflict. Understand deeply why each change was made, and what the original intent was. Read the commit messages, check the PRs, check original issues/tickets.
-
Resolve each hunk. Preserve both intents where possible. Where incompatible, pick the one matching the merge's stated goal and note the trade-off. Do not invent new behaviour. Always resolve; never
--abort. -
Discover the project's automated checks and run them — typically typecheck, then tests, then format. Fix anything the merge broke.
-
Finish the merge/rebase. Stage everything and commit. If rebasing, continue the rebase process until all commits are rebased.
What ships with it
2 files beside SKILL.md in the same directory: the scripts, references and assets a skill reads on demand. Not counted in the per-session cost; read them before you install if any of them is executable.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 1mo ago First seen · 15 lines · 23 tokens per session scan A c7c9ba81362a
resolving-merge-conflicts is a skill published in the GitHub repository mrclrchtr/supi (101 stars, last pushed yesterday), licensed MIT. It adds 23 tokens to every session and 204 once invoked, about $0.0001 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. It is 84% identical to resolve-merge-conflict, differing in 12 lines, and is treated as a copy.
Other skills, from other repositories
gh-address-comments
Help address review/issue comments on the open GitHub PR for the current branch using gh CLI; verify gh auth first and prompt the user to authenticate if not logged in.
babysit-pr
Babysit a GitHub pull request after creation by continuously polling review comments, CI checks/workflow runs, and mergeability state until the PR is merged/closed or user help is required. Diagnose failures, retry likely flaky failures up to 3 times, auto-fix/push branch-related issues when appropriate, and keep…
gh-find-prs
Survey open Codewhale PRs and triage each for mergeability and disposition against the real landing branch.
github
Skill "github" from Hmbown/Codewhale, covering github, when to use, setup, workflow and non-goals.
triage
Gatekeep and review GitHub issues and pull requests for Qwen Code maintainers. Use for GitHub Action issue triage, PR admission checks, product-direction review, KISS-focused PR review, and staged bilingual GitHub comments.
sem
Use sem for entity-level (function/class/method) code questions in any Git repo. Four questions, four verbs - where is it (sem find, sem grep), what does my change touch (sem impact), is it correct (sem check), what should a human review (sem certify). Trigger whenever the user asks where something is defined or…