Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add mrvladd-d/memobank --skill mb-verifygit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/mrvladd-d/memobankWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/mrvladd-d/memobank/mb-verify)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/mrvladd-d/memobank/mb-verify"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/mrvladd-d/memobank/mb-verify.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00017 | $0.02046 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00009 | $0.01023 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00003 | $0.00409 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00002 | $0.00205 |
Grade A, and why
mb-verify scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 8d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 158 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
mb-verify — Verifier loop (acceptance → evidence → verdict)
- What it does: checks a completed task against acceptance criteria and records the result with evidence.
- Use it when: implementation is done and you want an explicit PASS, FAIL, or partial verdict.
- Input:
TASK_ID, acceptance criteria sources, and the task protocol files. - Output:
verification.md, evidence artifacts, verification verdict, and recommended next status/follow-up bugs when criteria fail.
Goal
Independent-ish verification so we don’t “trust without verify”.
This is not the adversarial semantic pass.
If a task may satisfy AC/REQ while still being wrong in substance, follow with /red-verify / mb-red-verify.
Status Transition Modes
Status transitions have two modes.
Scheduler mode:
/autopilotand/autonomousown task status transitions.- Scheduler decides closure/failure/blocking eligibility.
/executereturns scoped implementation handoff; it does not close tasks./verifygives functional verdict/evidence; in scheduler mode it does not close/fail/block/promote./red-verifygives semantic verdict for T2/T3; in scheduler mode it does not close/fail/block/promote./mb-syncrecords/reconciles state after the scheduler-provided closure/failure/blocking decision. It does not decide closure itself.- T0/T1 scheduler closure may use compact evidence / functional PASS according to tier policy.
- T2/T3 scheduler closure requires
VERDICT: PASSplusSEMANTIC_VERDICT: semantic-passbefore scheduler marksdone. - T3 scheduler closure also requires exact markers
HUMAN_CHECKPOINT: doneandROLLBACK_RECOVERY_NOTE: present.
Manual mode:
- Expected T0/T1 simple flow:
/execute -> /verify. - Manual closure is allowed only when an explicit closure owner exists.
- T0/T1 may be marked
doneafter functionalVERDICT: PASSand completed evidence. - T2/T3 must not treat
/verify PASSalone as finaldone; run/red-verifyand requireSEMANTIC_VERDICT: semantic-passbefore final closure//mb-sync. - If required T2/T3
/red-verifyreturns anything other thansemantic-pass, leave closure pending or blocked, not done; optional T0/T1 red-verify does not make their normal verify-based closure stricter. semantic-concernin manual mode means do not trust the existingdonestate without human review / follow-up.- Do not mix scheduler mode and manual mode inside one task run.
- No persisted
modefield is used.
What ships with it
1 file beside SKILL.md in the same directory: the scripts, references and assets a skill reads on demand. Not counted in the per-session cost; read them before you install if any of them is executable.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 8d ago First seen · 158 lines · 17 tokens per session scan A 02636a3e8ceb
mb-verify is a skill published in the GitHub repository mrvladd-d/memobank (55 stars, last pushed 3mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 17 tokens to every session and 2,046 once invoked, about $0.0001 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other skills, from other repositories
research-engineer
An uncompromising Academic Research Engineer. Operates with absolute scientific rigor, objective criticism, and zero flair. Focuses on theoretical correctness, formal verification, and optimal implementation across any required technology.
tika-eval-compare
Compare extracts from two Tika builds over a corpus to detect regressions in content, encoding, exceptions, and embedded-document handling. Use for "compare before/after extracts", "eval this change against the corpus".
neuron-evaluation-engineer
Create and run AI evaluations with datasets, assertions, and output drivers in Neuron AI. Use this skill whenever the user mentions evaluation, testing AI systems, creating evaluators, dataset-driven testing, assertion-based validation, or wants to measure AI system performance. Also trigger for tasks involving…
jetson-validate-image
Use after jetson-flash-image to run static BSP checks, on-target smoke/regression tests on a flashed DUT, or both. Not for build or flash steps. Triggers: validate bsp, on-target validation.
atmos-validation
Validate Atmos projects, components, arbitrary JSON Schema inputs, EditorConfig, and GitHub Actions; use affected-file selection and native CI annotations.
skill-benchmark
Benchmark AI skill effectiveness by measuring implementation quality against legacy constraints.