Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add mrzhangguoguo/oh-my-workbuddy --skill security-reviewgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/mrzhangguoguo/oh-my-workbuddyWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/mrzhangguoguo/oh-my-workbuddy/security-review)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/mrzhangguoguo/oh-my-workbuddy/security-review"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/mrzhangguoguo/oh-my-workbuddy/security-review/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/mrzhangguoguo/oh-my-workbuddy/security-review"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/mrzhangguoguo/oh-my-workbuddy/security-review.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00021 | $0.00208 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00008 | $0.00083 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00004 | $0.00042 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00002 | $0.00021 |
Grade A, and why
security-review scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 1mo ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
What it actually says
Ported from oh-my-codex
security-review. OMX runtime conventions ($macroinvocation,omxCLI,.omx/state directory) are replaced with WorkBuddy idioms (Skill tool, Agent tool, task list,.workbuddy/memory).
Security Review — deprecated
Hard-deprecated. Do not invoke or route this skill.
When security concerns are in scope, invoke the code-review skill (skill: code-review) and ask it to emphasize security/OWASP checks (injection, authn/authz, secrets, input validation, dependency CVEs). The code-review skill runs inside WorkBuddy with no omx binary and no .omx/ directory.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 1mo ago First seen · 17 lines · 21 tokens per session scan A 4929a96b4544
security-review is a skill published in the GitHub repository mrzhangguoguo/oh-my-workbuddy (2 stars, last pushed 3mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 21 tokens to every session and 208 once invoked, about $0.0001 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.
Other skills, from other repositories
code-review
Structured code review focusing on correctness, security, and maintainability. Correctness before style. Every reviewer comment must be actionable.
aif-code-review
Review code for bugs, regressions, maintainability, reliability and verification gaps with evidence.
Security Audit Checklist
A PASS/FAIL/N/A checklist covering injection, authorization, secrets handling, dependency risk, and input validation for reviewing a diff or codebase.
PR Standards
Pull request description, review depth, and merge standards so every PR carries enough context to review and merge safely.
Security Checklist
A structured PASS / FAIL / N/A checklist covering common risk categories for reviewing a diff before merge.
Agent Instruction Drift Check
Procedure for comparing an agent-facing instruction doc (AGENTS.md/CLAUDE.md-style) against the actual current code and configuration to find and flag mismatches.