Getting it into your agent
There is no command for this one: it runs only inside a plugin, and the catalogue could not identify which plugin ships it. The source is linked below.
Wrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/mrzhangguoguo/oh-my-workbuddy/team)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/mrzhangguoguo/oh-my-workbuddy/team"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/mrzhangguoguo/oh-my-workbuddy/team/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/mrzhangguoguo/oh-my-workbuddy/team"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/mrzhangguoguo/oh-my-workbuddy/team.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00043 | $0.05905 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00022 | $0.02952 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00009 | $0.01181 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00004 | $0.00590 |
Grade A, and why
team scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 11d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 476 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Ported from oh-my-codex
team. OMX runtime conventions ($macroinvocation,omx teamCLI, tmux panes,.omx/state directory) are replaced with WorkBuddy idioms (TeamCreate, Agent tool, SendMessage, Task tools,.workbuddy/memory).
Team Skill
team is WorkBuddy's coordinated multi-agent execution mode. There is no tmux runtime and no omx team CLI — coordination is built from the TeamCreate tool (team + shared task board), the Agent tool (teammates), the SendMessage tool (mailbox/dispatch), and the Task tools (single source of truth). Treat this skill as an operator workflow, not a generic prompt pattern.
In non-team surfaces (plain single-session chat without a created team), do not present team as directly available; first call TeamCreate, or stay on the nearest single-agent surface until the user explicitly wants the multi-agent runtime.
Team vs Native Subagents
- Use a single Agent tool call (or a few run in parallel) for bounded, in-session parallelism where one leader thread can fan out a few independent subtasks and wait for them directly, with no shared mutable files.
- Use
teamwhen you need durable shared task state, explicit handoffs, role separation (delivery vs. verification), cross-boundary ownership, or long-running parallel execution that must stay tracked across the session and survive beyond one local reasoning burst. - Native Agent fan-out can complement
teamexecution, but it does not replace the team runtime's stateful coordination contract (shared task board, mailbox, lifecycle control).
What This Skill Must Do
When the user triggers team, the leader (you) must:
- Call TeamCreate to establish the team + task board (creates
/Users/lizhi/.workbuddy/teams/<team-name>.jsonand/Users/lizhi/.workbuddy/tasks/<team-name>/). - Build the shared task board with TaskCreate — one task per work item, with
subject,description,owner, andaddBlockedBy/addBlocksfor dependencies. - Fan out teammates with the Agent tool, each given:
team_name, a uniquename, asubagent_type/description, the goal, its claimed task id(s), the relevant file paths, and a precise "report back" contract. - Verify startup and surface concrete state/board evidence.
- Keep the team state alive until every teammate is terminal (unless explicit abort).
- Handle cleanup and stale-teammate recovery when needed.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 11d ago First seen · 476 lines · 43 tokens per session scan A 89d29d3d346c
team is a skill published in the GitHub repository mrzhangguoguo/oh-my-workbuddy (2 stars, last pushed 2mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 43 tokens to every session and 5,905 once invoked, about $0.0002 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.
Other skills, from other repositories
dispatch
Use when a task file exists in .hyperflow/tasks/ and workers need dispatching. Fans out parallel workers under per-batch Reviewers, runs a final integration review, and commits per sub-task. Endpoint of the auto-chain — no auto-deploy. Trigger with /hyperflow:dispatch, "run the plan", "execute the task", "build it"…
syndic
Gère un parc de copropriétés en France avec vue portfolio consolidée. Couvre administration, comptabilité (décret 2005, plan comptable copro, 5 annexes), assemblées générales (convocation, PV, notification), appels de fonds, travaux, fournisseurs, recouvrement d'impayés et transition de syndic. Maîtrise les majorités…
flow-next-plan
Plan a feature into a flow-next spec with tasks in .flow/. Use when asked to plan, spec out, or break down work (fn-N ids).
template-instantiation
Creates .NET projects from templates with validated parameters, smart defaults, Central Package Management adaptation, and latest NuGet version resolution. USE FOR: creating new dotnet projects, scaffolding solutions with multiple projects, installing or uninstalling template packages, creating projects that respect…
project-execution
Executes implementation plans with progress tracking, checkpoint validation, and quality gates. Use after planning is complete and tasks are ready to implement.
note-improvement
Capture an out-of-scope improvement opportunity so it doesn't get lost. Use when the user asks to "note improvement", "save improvement", "track this for later", "remember this improvement", "note this idea", "log improvement", "backlog this", or "park this idea". Also invoke proactively when noticing something…