Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add msaad00/agent-bom --skill discover-snowflakegit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/msaad00/agent-bomWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/msaad00/agent-bom/discover-snowflake)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/msaad00/agent-bom/discover-snowflake"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/msaad00/agent-bom/discover-snowflake.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>- NVIDIA SkillSpector warn
SkillSpector: 1 finding, up to medium
These are SkillSpector’s own severities. On a checked sample its high-severity flags on skills were ~96% false positives — a documented command, a public API, a “never do X” rule — so we show them as a caution to read, not a verdict. Why →
- medium Excessive Agency · line 26 Skill enables autonomous high-impact decisions without human-in-the-loop verification. Critical operations (destructive commands, financial transactions, data deletion) should require explicit user confirmation.Fix: Add human-in-the-loop confirmation for destructive, irreversible, or high-impact operations. Never auto-execute commands that modify files, send data, or alter system state.
What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00075 | $0.01096 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00037 | $0.00548 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00015 | $0.00219 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00007 | $0.00110 |
Grade A, and why
agent-bom-discover-snowflake scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 4d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
What it actually says
agent-bom-discover-snowflake
Use this skill to collect Snowflake AI and workload inventory as schema-valid agent-bom inventory. Default to discover-only: write JSON to an operator-selected path and stop.
Guardrails
- Use only operator-approved Snowflake accounts, warehouses, databases, and read-only roles.
- Prefer SSO, OAuth, or key-pair auth. Do not request or display
SNOWFLAKE_PASSWORD, private key contents, passphrases, or OAuth tokens. - Do not modify Snowflake resources. This workflow is discovery-only.
- Write inventory only to a path the operator chose.
- Treat AI-generated prose as non-authoritative; schema-validated inventory JSON is the evidence.
Workflow
python examples/operator_pull/snowflake_inventory_adapter.py \
--account "$SNOWFLAKE_ACCOUNT" \
--user "$SNOWFLAKE_USER" \
--authenticator snowflake_jwt \
--source snowflake-skill-invoked \
--discovery-method skill_invoked_pull \
--output snowflake-inventory.json
Scan only when the operator asks for findings:
agent-bom scan --inventory snowflake-inventory.json --format json --output agent-bom-snowflake-findings.json
Evidence Contract
The emitted inventory carries discovery_provenance.source_type: skill_invoked_pull, observed_via: skill_invoked_pull, snowflake_sdk,
sanitized metadata.permissions_used, and redacted credential material. If
schema validation fails, stop and fix the inventory instead of scanning a
best-effort summary.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 4d ago Changed 633fa46eb772
- 8d ago First seen · 113 lines · 75 tokens per session scan A 0caf300add4e
agent-bom-discover-snowflake is a skill published in the GitHub repository msaad00/agent-bom (31 stars, last pushed today), licensed Apache-2.0. It adds 75 tokens to every session and 1,096 once invoked, about $0.0004 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other skills, from other repositories
red-teaming-llms-with-garak
Run NVIDIA garak probe suites against an LLM endpoint to test for jailbreaks, prompt injection, data leakage, and toxic generation, then interpret the hit-rate report for triage and reporting.
implementing-aqua-security-for-container-scanning
Deploy Aqua Security's Trivy scanner to detect vulnerabilities, misconfigurations, secrets, and license issues in container images across CI/CD pipelines and registries.
performing-container-security-scanning-with-trivy
Scan container images, filesystems, and Kubernetes manifests for vulnerabilities, misconfigurations, exposed secrets, and license compliance issues using Aqua Security Trivy with SBOM generation and CI/CD integration.
AI & LLM Security
LLM and AI application security testing — prompt injection, jailbreak resistance, OWASP LLM Top 10 (2025), RAG and agent/tool-use security, model supply chain, and AI red teaming for authorized assessments.
llm-evaluation
Implement comprehensive evaluation strategies for LLM applications using automated metrics, human feedback, and benchmarking. Use when testing LLM performance, measuring AI application quality, or establishing evaluation frameworks.
rag-implementation
Build Retrieval-Augmented Generation (RAG) systems for LLM applications with vector databases and semantic search. Use when implementing knowledge-grounded AI, building document Q&A systems, or integrating LLMs with external knowledge bases.