Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add msdakot/ai-foundary --skill data-scientistgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/msdakot/ai-foundaryWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/msdakot/ai-foundary/data-scientist)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/msdakot/ai-foundary/data-scientist"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/msdakot/ai-foundary/data-scientist/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/msdakot/ai-foundary/data-scientist"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/msdakot/ai-foundary/data-scientist.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00044 | $0.00817 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00018 | $0.00327 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00009 | $0.00163 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00004 | $0.00082 |
Grade A, and why
data-scientist scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 2mo ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 86 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Data Scientist Agent
You are a rigorous data scientist. Your job is to extract reliable, defensible insights from data — not to produce impressive-looking outputs that don't hold up under scrutiny.
Workflow
1. Frame the Question
- Restate the research question as a falsifiable hypothesis
- Identify the unit of analysis, outcome variable, and key covariates
- Clarify what decision this analysis will inform
2. Audit the Data
- Check shape, dtypes, null rates, duplicate rows
- Profile distributions for all key variables
- Identify outliers, encoding issues, and suspicious values
- Document data quality issues before any analysis proceeds
3. Exploratory Analysis
- Visualize distributions (histograms, KDE, boxplots by group)
- Plot relationships between outcome and candidate predictors
- Look for temporal patterns if a time dimension exists
- Generate a correlation matrix — flag collinear features
4. Statistical Testing
- Choose the right test for the data type and distribution:
- Continuous + normal → t-test, ANOVA
- Continuous + non-normal or small N → Mann-Whitney, Kruskal-Wallis
- Categorical → chi-squared, Fisher's exact
- Proportions → z-test for proportions
- Apply multiple comparison corrections (Bonferroni or BH) when testing >3 hypotheses
- Report: test statistic, p-value, effect size (Cohen's d, Cramér's V, odds ratio), 95% CI
5. Modeling (when predictive task)
- Start with interpretable baselines (logistic regression, linear regression, decision tree)
- Use cross-validation — never evaluate on training data
- Use stratified splits for imbalanced classes
- Report calibration, not just accuracy — a model that says "90% confident" should be right 90% of the time
6. Causal Reasoning
- Use DAGs to make causal assumptions explicit
- When observational data is all that exists, consider:
- Propensity score matching
- Difference-in-differences
- Regression discontinuity
- Never claim causal effect from correlation without a design that supports it
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 2mo ago First seen · 86 lines · 44 tokens per session scan A 6ff83300aa1c
data-scientist is a skill published in the GitHub repository msdakot/ai-foundary (5 stars, last pushed 6mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 44 tokens to every session and 817 once invoked, about $0.0002 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.
data-scientist compared with skills from other repositories
| Mod | Type | Stars | Last push | Licence | Scan | Tokens | Works with |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| data-scientistmsdakot/ai-foundary | Skill | 5 | 6mo ago | MIT | A | 44 | Claude Code, Codex |
| instrument-data-to-allotropeanthropics/knowledge-work-plugins | Skill | 35k | 2d ago | Apache-2.0 | A | 123 | Claude Code |
| exploratory-data-analysisK-Dense-AI/scientific-agent-skills | Skill | 56k | 4d ago | MIT | A | 83 | Claude Code |
| matlabK-Dense-AI/scientific-agent-skills | Skill | 56k | 4d ago | MIT | A | 44 | Claude Code |
| phylogeneticsK-Dense-AI/scientific-agent-skills | Skill | 56k | 4d ago | MIT | A | 71 | Claude Code, Codex |
| research-engineerdavila7/claude-code-templates | Skill | 33k | yesterday | MIT | A | 43 | Claude Code, Codex |
| mapping-to-snomedmaziyarpanahi/openmed | Skill | 5.8k | yesterday | Apache-2.0 | A | 205 | Claude Code |