academic-language-toolkit

academic-language-toolkit is a skill for Claude Code from muhammad1438/academic-writer-skills. It costs 0 tokens per session (2,443 once invoked), scanned A, original, MIT.

A toolkit for changing casual or informal writing into precise, formal academic language.

In plain words
What is it for?
Use it to improve vocabulary, uncertainty wording, reporting verbs, transitions, sentence structure, and the academic tone of drafts.
Why use it?
It helps replace conversational wording and overconfident claims with language that is clearer, more precise, and appropriately cautious.

Skill for Claude Code

Written for Claude Code: shipped in a Claude Code plugin.

Part of the academic-writer plugin — 27 skills shipped together

Good fit Use it to improve vocabulary, uncertainty wording, reporting verbs, transitions, sentence structure, and the academic tone of drafts.

Compare 6 skills from other repositories ↓
Install with agentmods
npx agentmods add skills/muhammad1438/academic-writer-skills/academic-language-toolkit
Install

Getting it into your agent

One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.

Any agent
npx skills add muhammad1438/academic-writer-skills --skill academic-language-toolkit
Clone the repo
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/muhammad1438/academic-writer-skills

Made for: Claude Code.

Or install academic-writer, the plugin that ships this one along with the rest of its 27 skills.

Wrote this? Show the measurements

A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.

agentmods badge for academic-language-toolkit

README.md
[![agentmods](https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/muhammad1438/academic-writer-skills/academic-language-toolkit/github.svg)](https://agentmods.dev/skills/muhammad1438/academic-writer-skills/academic-language-toolkit)
Your own site
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/muhammad1438/academic-writer-skills/academic-language-toolkit"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/muhammad1438/academic-writer-skills/academic-language-toolkit/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>

Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.

agentmods 80×15 button for academic-language-toolkit

Your own site · 80×15
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/muhammad1438/academic-writer-skills/academic-language-toolkit"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/muhammad1438/academic-writer-skills/academic-language-toolkit.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>
Per session 0 Skills are progressive disclosure: only the name and description are preloaded; the body loads when the skill is used.
When invoked 2,443 The whole file, excluding the scripts and references it only reads on demand.
Security scan A 0 findings. A grade says what 26 rules found in the file — not that it is safe.
Origin original No closer match found in the catalogue.
Token cost

What it costs to keep this loaded

Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.

ModelPer sessionOnce invoked
Fable 5.1 $0.00000 $0.02443
Opus 5 $0.00000 $0.01222
Sonnet 5 $0.00000 $0.00489
Haiku 4.5 $0.00000 $0.00244

Measured 12d ago against content hash 6e7eb7c7b46d, method: parsed. Prices are Anthropic first-party input rates as of 2026-09-11, from the pricing page.

Security

Grade A, and why

academic-language-toolkit scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 12d ago.

A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.

Nothing flagged

None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.

skills/academic-language-toolkit/SKILL.md · 241 lines

How it starts

The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 241 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.

Academic Language Toolkit

Academic discourse is characterised by a specialised lexicon, objective tonal registers, and syntactic structures that prioritise information density and conceptual precision over conversational fluidity.


1. Hedging Language (Epistemic Modality)

Hedging is not weakness — it is a marker of academic credibility. It signals that the writer is aware of the limits of the evidence and the boundaries of their claims. Overconfident assertions without hedging are a red flag in academic review.

Modal Verbs (Degrees of Certainty)

Verb Certainty Level Example
will Very high "This will result in..."
would High / conditional "This would suggest..."
should Moderate / expected "This should be interpreted..."
may Moderate "This may indicate..."
might Lower "This might be attributed to..."
could Low / speculative "This could be explained by..."

Hedging Adverbs

  • High certainty: generally, typically, usually, commonly, predominantly, consistently
  • Moderate: often, frequently, largely, broadly
  • Tentative: apparently, seemingly, arguably, possibly, presumably, conceivably, perhaps

Hedging Adjectives

  • possible, probable, likely, unlikely, potential, apparent, plausible, uncertain

Hedging Verbs

  • suggest, indicate, appear, seem, tend, imply, propose, hypothesise, point to

Hedging Phrases (Ready to Use)

  • "Evidence suggests that..."
  • "It is possible that..."
  • "It could be argued that..."
  • "There is reason to believe that..."
  • "The data appear to indicate..."
  • "It seems likely that..."
  • "Under certain conditions, this may..."
  • "These findings tentatively suggest..."
  • "Preliminary evidence points to..."

Discipline Differences

  • STEM: Hedges primarily through statistical language ("p < 0.05," "within a 95% confidence interval") and passive constructions
  • Social Sciences: Heavy use of modal verbs and tentative reporting verbs
  • Humanities: Hedging through phrases like "arguably," "one might contend," "it is tempting to read this as"

Read the full file on GitHub · 241 lines

Changes

What this file has done since we first saw it

Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.

  1. 12d ago First seen · 241 lines · 0 tokens per session scan A 6e7eb7c7b46d

Subscribe to this mod's changes

academic-language-toolkit is a skill published in the GitHub repository muhammad1438/academic-writer-skills (6 stars, last pushed 5mo ago), licensed MIT. It costs nothing until one of its globs matches a file; then it loads 2,443 tokens. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.

Related

Other skills, from other repositories

thesis-control

Use when AI-assisted thesis or manuscript edits risk claim drift, scope creep, loss of intended use, experiment-role promotion, or repeated revisions that fail to converge; provides author-intent control, lightweight or strict contracts, drift audits, revision escalation, and human gates.

yha9806/academic-writing-toolkit · 57 tokens

argument-governance

Build and audit the manuscript or research-project argument system across intended use, gaps, claims, data, results, experiment roles, contributions, innovation evidence, limitations, and contribution focus. Use when a paper, thesis chapter, review article, or research project needs an explicit argument map…

yha9806/academic-writing-toolkit · 143 tokens

manuscript-reframe

Reframe report-like academic drafts into paper-form scientific arguments while preserving or explicitly renegotiating author intent; requires an approved old-versus-proposed spine, evidence and argument baselines, analysis-role control, and post-edit drift review.

yha9806/academic-writing-toolkit · 53 tokens

audit

Check thesis chapters for consistency before submission — contradictory numbers, terminology drift, and broken cross-references.

yha9806/academic-writing-toolkit · 22 tokens

self-review

Review the user's own manuscript, paper, thesis chapter, rebuttal, or release packet with clean-room anti-contamination controls and, when needed, an unfamiliar-reader comprehension gate. Use for internal review, readiness checks, reviewer simulation, or claim-evidence self-audit where prior chat memory and unstated…

yha9806/academic-writing-toolkit · 69 tokens

evidence-review

Build evidence-controlled literature reviews and gap maps with source-status labels, claim registers, citation-role plans, traceability tables, and overclaim audits. Use when drafting or auditing review papers, thesis literature reviews, scoping reviews, or evidence syntheses where adjacent-domain evidence, candidate…

yha9806/academic-writing-toolkit · 72 tokens