Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add yha9806/academic-writing-toolkit --skill manuscript-reframegit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/yha9806/academic-writing-toolkitWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/yha9806/academic-writing-toolkit/manuscript-reframe)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/yha9806/academic-writing-toolkit/manuscript-reframe"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/yha9806/academic-writing-toolkit/manuscript-reframe/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/yha9806/academic-writing-toolkit/manuscript-reframe"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/yha9806/academic-writing-toolkit/manuscript-reframe.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>- NVIDIA SkillSpector pass
What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00053 | $0.02006 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00026 | $0.01003 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00011 | $0.00401 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00005 | $0.00201 |
Grade A, and why
manuscript-reframe scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 6d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 251 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
/manuscript-reframe - Scientific Manuscript Reframing
Purpose
Turn a technically valid but report-like manuscript into a scientific paper argument. Use this when a draft contains many modules, raw tables, internal artifact language, scattered figures, or exploratory AI/report-generation material but the scientific gap and contribution are not yet crisp.
Trigger Words
This skill activates on: manuscript reframe, paper form, too much like a report, gap and contribution, scientific framing, journal framing, submission clean, methods paper, /manuscript-reframe.
Core Rule
Write around the scientific problem, not the implementation inventory.
Reframing may reorganise the manuscript argument. It may not silently redefine the real-world problem, intended use, research object, core question, primary experiment, contribution order, headline claim, or evidence boundary. Treat changes to any of those items as an author decision, not as polishing.
Before editing, force the draft into one sentence:
This paper solves [specific reliability / evidence / workflow gap] between [upstream technical output] and [downstream scientific or operator-facing use].
If the sentence cannot be written, do not rewrite sections yet. First produce a gap-and-contribution diagnosis.
Workflow
0. Lock Author Intent And The Reframe Contract
Read the canonical /thesis-control intent and manuscript contract. For a
lightweight project, read 00_AUTHOR_INTENT.md,
01_EVIDENCE_AND_CLAIMS.md, and 02_REVISION_LOG.md. Record:
- real-world problem and intended use
- current method or software task
- research object and core scientific question
- primary experiment and supporting analyses
- headline claim and evidence boundary
- concepts that must remain visible in the title or abstract
- evidence baseline and argument baseline
Then show an old-versus-proposed comparison for every item above, plus the
title/abstract thesis, contribution order, and proposed structure. Mark each
row preserve, narrow, promote, demote, remove, or change. Do not
edit the manuscript until the author explicitly approves the proposed reframe.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 6d ago Changed · +47 lines · -4 tokens per session 5ff4d14929b0
- 10d ago First seen · 204 lines · 57 tokens per session scan A 0e1eec2a23c9
manuscript-reframe is a skill published in the GitHub repository yha9806/academic-writing-toolkit (37 stars, last pushed 2d ago), licensed MIT. It adds 53 tokens to every session and 2,006 once invoked, about $0.0003 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other skills, from other repositories
figure-table-checker
Check, improve, and ensure compliance of figures and tables in academic papers. Use this skill whenever the user needs to verify figure or table formatting, choose error bar types, check colorblind accessibility, ensure APA or journal-specific compliance, create CONSORT or PRISMA flow diagrams, or fix common figure…
statistical-reporting
Report statistical results accurately and completely for any academic discipline. Use this skill whenever the user needs to write up statistics in APA 7th or other styles, report effect sizes, describe power analyses, interpret Bayesian factors, check reporting against CONSORT/STROBE/PRISMA/ARRIVE guidelines, or…
reference-verifier
Verify the accuracy and integrity of academic references. Use this skill whenever the user needs to check whether citations are accurate, find DOIs, detect retracted papers, identify AI-hallucinated citations, find orphan or phantom references, verify author names or publication details, or run a pre-submission…
abstract-writer
Write, evaluate, rewrite, or improve academic abstracts for research papers, dissertations, conference submissions, or journal manuscripts. Use this skill whenever the user needs an abstract written or improved, asks about abstract structure, wants to know what to include in an abstract, or needs to understand the…
grant-proposal
Write, structure, and improve grant proposals for any funding body — including NIH, NSF, EU Horizon, Wellcome Trust, ERC, and UKRI. Use this skill whenever the user needs to write a grant application, improve a funding proposal, understand grant review criteria, draft a specific aims page, write a budget…
lab-report
Write, structure, and improve lab reports for any scientific discipline. Use this skill whenever the user needs to write a lab report, understand what goes in each section, improve their methods or results section, format figures and tables, report statistics correctly, or understand the conventions of scientific…