Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add muhammad1438/academic-writer-skills --skill lab-reportgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/muhammad1438/academic-writer-skillsWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/muhammad1438/academic-writer-skills/lab-report)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/muhammad1438/academic-writer-skills/lab-report"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/muhammad1438/academic-writer-skills/lab-report/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/muhammad1438/academic-writer-skills/lab-report"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/muhammad1438/academic-writer-skills/lab-report.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00000 | $0.01997 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00000 | $0.00999 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00000 | $0.00399 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00000 | $0.00200 |
Grade A, and why
lab-report scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 11d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 180 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Lab Report
A lab report is a formal record of a scientific investigation — its purpose is to communicate what was done, what was found, and what it means with sufficient clarity and detail that another scientist could replicate the work and evaluate the conclusions.
Standard Lab Report Structure
| Section | Purpose | Key Conventions |
|---|---|---|
| Title | Identify the experiment | Descriptive, specific; no vague titles |
| Abstract | Standalone summary | 150–250 words; all 5 elements present |
| Introduction | Context and purpose | Background → gap → hypothesis |
| Methods | Reproducibility record | Past tense, passive voice; sufficient detail |
| Results | Objective data presentation | No interpretation; figures + statistics |
| Discussion | Interpretation and analysis | Relate to hypothesis and literature |
| Conclusion | Summary and implications | Brief; no new information |
| References | Sources cited | Per discipline style (APA, Vancouver, ACS, CSE) |
Discipline Variants
| Discipline | Key Differences |
|---|---|
| Chemistry | Reaction equations in Methods; yield calculations in Results; mechanism discussion; ACS citation style |
| Biology | Organism descriptions in Methods; ecological context; species names in italics; CSE or Vancouver citation |
| Physics | Error analysis and uncertainty reporting required; significant figures strictly observed; SI units mandatory |
| Engineering | May include design specifications; MATLAB/code in appendix; IEEE citation; safety considerations |
| Psychology | APA format throughout; ethics statement required; statistical reporting follows APA style strictly |
Title Rules
A good lab report title is specific and informative, not vague.
| Weak Title | Strong Title |
|---|---|
| "Enzyme Lab" | "Effect of Temperature on Amylase Activity in Human Saliva" |
| "Electricity Experiment" | "Relationship Between Resistance and Temperature in Copper Wire" |
| "Titration" | "Determination of Acetic Acid Concentration in Commercial Vinegar by Acid-Base Titration" |
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 11d ago First seen · 180 lines · 0 tokens per session scan A bddeae14e774
lab-report is a skill published in the GitHub repository muhammad1438/academic-writer-skills (6 stars, last pushed 5mo ago), licensed MIT. It costs nothing until one of its globs matches a file; then it loads 1,997 tokens. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.
Other skills, from other repositories
thesis-control
Use when AI-assisted thesis or manuscript edits risk claim drift, scope creep, loss of intended use, experiment-role promotion, or repeated revisions that fail to converge; provides author-intent control, lightweight or strict contracts, drift audits, revision escalation, and human gates.
manuscript-reframe
Reframe report-like academic drafts into paper-form scientific arguments while preserving or explicitly renegotiating author intent; requires an approved old-versus-proposed spine, evidence and argument baselines, analysis-role control, and post-edit drift review.
argument-governance
Build and audit the manuscript or research-project argument system across intended use, gaps, claims, data, results, experiment roles, contributions, innovation evidence, limitations, and contribution focus. Use when a paper, thesis chapter, review article, or research project needs an explicit argument map…
audit
Check thesis chapters for consistency before submission — contradictory numbers, terminology drift, and broken cross-references.
self-review
Review the user's own manuscript, paper, thesis chapter, rebuttal, or release packet with clean-room anti-contamination controls and, when needed, an unfamiliar-reader comprehension gate. Use for internal review, readiness checks, reviewer simulation, or claim-evidence self-audit where prior chat memory and unstated…
evidence-review
Build evidence-controlled literature reviews and gap maps with source-status labels, claim registers, citation-role plans, traceability tables, and overclaim audits. Use when drafting or auditing review papers, thesis literature reviews, scoping reviews, or evidence syntheses where adjacent-domain evidence, candidate…