Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add muhammad1438/academic-writer-skills --skill academic-writing-coregit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/muhammad1438/academic-writer-skillsWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/muhammad1438/academic-writer-skills/academic-writing-core)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/muhammad1438/academic-writer-skills/academic-writing-core"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/muhammad1438/academic-writer-skills/academic-writing-core/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/muhammad1438/academic-writer-skills/academic-writing-core"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/muhammad1438/academic-writer-skills/academic-writing-core.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00128 | $0.02124 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00064 | $0.01062 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00026 | $0.00425 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00013 | $0.00212 |
Grade A, and why
academic-writing-core scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 12d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 166 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Academic Writing Core
This is the master orchestrator for all academic writing tasks. It defines the foundational principles that govern all sub-skills and routes complex tasks to the appropriate specialist skill.
Core Philosophy
Academic writing is NOT a single style. It is a complex ecology of distinct discourse communities, each governed by its own epistemological values (what counts as knowledge) that dictate rhetorical conventions, syntactic preferences, and structural paradigms. Before producing any academic text, establish:
- Discipline — Which field? (STEM / Social Sciences / Humanities / Law / Medicine / Business)
- Paper Type — What genre? (Essay / Research Paper / Dissertation / Review / Report)
- Citation Style — Which format? (APA / MLA / Chicago / IEEE / Vancouver / Harvard)
- Audience — Experts in the field? Interdisciplinary? Instructors?
- Regional Tradition — US English or UK English?
Discipline-Specific Conventions at a Glance
Humanities (Literature, History, Philosophy, Art History)
- Voice: Active voice preferred — emphasizes human agency and interpretation
- Evidence: Direct quotation is primary evidence; exact wording of sources is deeply valued
- Tone: Reflective, interpretive, argumentative; nuanced close reading
- Citation: MLA (literature), Chicago NB (history/arts)
- Key genres: Literary analysis, historical monograph, philosophical argument essay
- First-person: Generally permitted for interpretive stance
Social Sciences (Psychology, Sociology, Education, Political Science)
- Voice: Mix; APA recommends active ("We conducted") for clarity
- Evidence: Paraphrase and synthesis of existing research dominates; statistics
- Tone: Strictly objective; extensive exploration of complex social phenomena
- Citation: APA 7th (psychology, education), Chicago Author-Date (political science)
- Key genres: Empirical research report, literature review, case study
- First-person: Permitted in APA 7th ("We found that...")
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 12d ago First seen · 166 lines · 128 tokens per session scan A 3047c40e2d54
academic-writing-core is a skill published in the GitHub repository muhammad1438/academic-writer-skills (6 stars, last pushed 6mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 128 tokens to every session and 2,124 once invoked, about $0.0006 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.
Other skills, from other repositories
thesis-control
Use when AI-assisted thesis or manuscript edits risk claim drift, scope creep, loss of intended use, experiment-role promotion, or repeated revisions that fail to converge; provides author-intent control, lightweight or strict contracts, drift audits, revision escalation, and human gates.
argument-governance
Build and audit the manuscript or research-project argument system across intended use, gaps, claims, data, results, experiment roles, contributions, innovation evidence, limitations, and contribution focus. Use when a paper, thesis chapter, review article, or research project needs an explicit argument map…
manuscript-reframe
Reframe report-like academic drafts into paper-form scientific arguments while preserving or explicitly renegotiating author intent; requires an approved old-versus-proposed spine, evidence and argument baselines, analysis-role control, and post-edit drift review.
audit
Check thesis chapters for consistency before submission — contradictory numbers, terminology drift, and broken cross-references.
self-review
Review the user's own manuscript, paper, thesis chapter, rebuttal, or release packet with clean-room anti-contamination controls and, when needed, an unfamiliar-reader comprehension gate. Use for internal review, readiness checks, reviewer simulation, or claim-evidence self-audit where prior chat memory and unstated…
evidence-review
Build evidence-controlled literature reviews and gap maps with source-status labels, claim registers, citation-role plans, traceability tables, and overclaim audits. Use when drafting or auditing review papers, thesis literature reviews, scoping reviews, or evidence syntheses where adjacent-domain evidence, candidate…