Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add muhammad1438/academic-writer-skills --skill conference-presentationgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/muhammad1438/academic-writer-skillsWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/muhammad1438/academic-writer-skills/conference-presentation)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/muhammad1438/academic-writer-skills/conference-presentation"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/muhammad1438/academic-writer-skills/conference-presentation/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/muhammad1438/academic-writer-skills/conference-presentation"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/muhammad1438/academic-writer-skills/conference-presentation.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00000 | $0.04179 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00000 | $0.02090 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00000 | $0.00836 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00000 | $0.00418 |
Grade A, and why
conference-presentation scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 12d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 428 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Conference Presentation
Academic conferences are where research meets its audience. Whether delivering a 10-minute talk or standing beside a poster for 2 hours, the goal is the same: communicate your contribution clearly, engagingly, and memorably. This skill covers conference posters, oral presentations, slide design, and conference abstracts.
Conference Posters
A research poster is a visual abstract — it should communicate your entire study at a glance, then reward deeper reading. Most viewers spend 1–3 minutes; the poster must work for both the quick glance and the detailed read.
Poster Dimensions and Orientation
| Format | Dimensions | Use Case |
|---|---|---|
| A0 Portrait | 841 × 1189 mm (33.1 × 46.8 in) | Most European conferences |
| A0 Landscape | 1189 × 841 mm (46.8 × 33.1 in) | Wide-format display |
| US Standard | 36 × 48 in (91 × 122 cm) | Most US conferences |
| Large US | 48 × 96 in (122 × 244 cm) | APS, AAPT, large physics meetings |
| A1 Portrait | 594 × 841 mm (23.4 × 33.1 in) | Smaller European venues |
Always check conference requirements — some specify exact dimensions and orientation.
Visual Hierarchy and Layout
The viewer's eye should flow naturally: Title → Authors → Visual Centre → Results → Conclusions
Grid Layout (3 or 4 columns):
┌─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┐
│ TITLE (large, readable from 2m) Logo │
│ Authors, Affiliations (readable from 1m) │
├─────────────┬─────────────┬─────────────┬───────────────┤
│ INTRO/ │ METHODS │ RESULTS │ CONCLUSIONS │
│ BACKGROUND │ (diagrams, │ (key figures│ (3-5 bullets │
│ (brief, │ flowcharts│ large, │ with impact)│
│ 100-150 │ minimal │ minimal │ │
│ words) │ text) │ text) │ │
│ │ │ │ │
│ │ │ DISCUSSION │ FUTURE WORK │
│ │ │ (optional) │ ACKNOWLEDGE- │
│ │ │ │ MENTS │
├─────────────┴─────────────┴─────────────┴───────────────┤
│ REFERENCES (small, numbered) QR CODE Contact │
└─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┘
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 12d ago First seen · 428 lines · 0 tokens per session scan A 5395d19ba667
conference-presentation is a skill published in the GitHub repository muhammad1438/academic-writer-skills (6 stars, last pushed 6mo ago), licensed MIT. It costs nothing until one of its globs matches a file; then it loads 4,179 tokens. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.
Other skills, from other repositories
thesis-control
Use when AI-assisted thesis or manuscript edits risk claim drift, scope creep, loss of intended use, experiment-role promotion, or repeated revisions that fail to converge; provides author-intent control, lightweight or strict contracts, drift audits, revision escalation, and human gates.
argument-governance
Build and audit the manuscript or research-project argument system across intended use, gaps, claims, data, results, experiment roles, contributions, innovation evidence, limitations, and contribution focus. Use when a paper, thesis chapter, review article, or research project needs an explicit argument map…
manuscript-reframe
Reframe report-like academic drafts into paper-form scientific arguments while preserving or explicitly renegotiating author intent; requires an approved old-versus-proposed spine, evidence and argument baselines, analysis-role control, and post-edit drift review.
audit
Check thesis chapters for consistency before submission — contradictory numbers, terminology drift, and broken cross-references.
self-review
Review the user's own manuscript, paper, thesis chapter, rebuttal, or release packet with clean-room anti-contamination controls and, when needed, an unfamiliar-reader comprehension gate. Use for internal review, readiness checks, reviewer simulation, or claim-evidence self-audit where prior chat memory and unstated…
evidence-review
Build evidence-controlled literature reviews and gap maps with source-status labels, claim registers, citation-role plans, traceability tables, and overclaim audits. Use when drafting or auditing review papers, thesis literature reviews, scoping reviews, or evidence syntheses where adjacent-domain evidence, candidate…