Anthropic Cybersecurity Skills is a library of structured cybersecurity procedures for AI agents, covering security domains and mappings to established security frameworks. It is for authorized security analysis, penetration testing, incident response, research, defense, and education across compatible AI platforms. The catalogue entries package parts of this library as agent skills, instructions, or a plugin.
Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add mukul975/Anthropic-Cybersecurity-Skills --skill analyzing-linux-elf-malwaregit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/mukul975/Anthropic-Cybersecurity-SkillsWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/mukul975/anthropic-cybersecurity-skills/analyzing-linux-elf-malware)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/mukul975/anthropic-cybersecurity-skills/analyzing-linux-elf-malware"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/mukul975/anthropic-cybersecurity-skills/analyzing-linux-elf-malware/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/mukul975/anthropic-cybersecurity-skills/analyzing-linux-elf-malware"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/mukul975/anthropic-cybersecurity-skills/analyzing-linux-elf-malware.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>- Socket pass
- Snyk fail
- NVIDIA SkillSpector warn
SkillSpector: 4 findings, up to high
These are SkillSpector’s own severities. On a checked sample its high-severity flags on skills were ~96% false positives — a documented command, a public API, a “never do X” rule — so we show them as a caution to read, not a verdict. Why →
- high YARA Match · line 270 YARA rule matched a known malware signature (reverse shell, backdoor, ransomware, C2 framework, or info stealer).Fix: Remove the malware payload or compromised file entirely. Investigate how it entered the skill and audit all other artifacts for additional indicators of compromise.
- high YARA Match · line 318 YARA rule matched cryptocurrency mining indicators (stratum protocol, mining pools, miner binaries, or cryptojacking scripts).Fix: Remove all cryptocurrency mining code, pool references, and miner binaries. Mining in agent skills is unauthorized resource abuse. Report the skill as malicious.
- high YARA Match · line 344 YARA rule matched cryptocurrency mining indicators (stratum protocol, mining pools, miner binaries, or cryptojacking scripts).Fix: Remove all cryptocurrency mining code, pool references, and miner binaries. Mining in agent skills is unauthorized resource abuse. Report the skill as malicious.
- high Privilege Escalation · line 362 Code accesses credential files (SSH keys, AWS credentials, etc.). This could indicate credential theft attempts.Fix: Remove references to credential paths. Use environment variables or secrets managers. For docs, use placeholder paths (e.g., /path/to/config). Never load .env or token files in production code paths.
What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00082 | $0.03189 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00041 | $0.01595 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00016 | $0.00638 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00008 | $0.00319 |
Grade B, and why
analyzing-linux-elf-malware scanned grade B with 2 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 11d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Reaches for credential filesmediumPrivilege escalation
SSH keys, cloud credentials, git-credentials, .npmrc, /etc/shadow: reading these is how a config file becomes a credential leak.
[2] SSH key added to /root/.ssh/authorized_keys Downgraded: this mod is about security review, or the phrase is quoted, so it is likely naming the pattern rather than instructing it.
Makes network callslowCapability
Not a fault in itself. Listed so you know the mod talks to something, and to what.
grep -iE "(bash|sh|wget|curl|chmod|/tmp/|/dev/)" strings_output.txt Copies of this mod
7 near-identical copies found in the catalogue:
- analyzing-linux-elf-malware — 100% identical, 0 lines differ
- analyzing-linux-elf-malware — 89% identical, 34 lines differ
- analyzing-linux-elf-malware — 86% identical, 53 lines differ
- analyzing-linux-elf-malware — 86% identical, 53 lines differ
- analyzing-linux-elf-malware — 86% identical, 53 lines differ
- analyzing-linux-elf-malware — 86% identical, 53 lines differ
- analyzing-linux-elf-malware — 86% identical, 37 lines differ
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 371 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Analyzing Linux ELF Malware
When to Use
- A Linux server or container has been compromised and suspicious ELF binaries are found
- Analyzing Linux botnets (Mirai, Gafgyt, XorDDoS), cryptominers, or ransomware
- Investigating malware targeting cloud infrastructure, Docker containers, or Kubernetes pods
- Reverse engineering Linux rootkits and kernel modules
- Analyzing cross-platform malware compiled for Linux x86_64, ARM, or MIPS architectures
Do not use for Windows PE binary analysis; use PEStudio, Ghidra, or IDA for Windows malware.
Prerequisites
- Ghidra or IDA with Linux ELF support for disassembly and decompilation
- Linux analysis VM (Ubuntu 22.04 recommended) with development tools installed
- strace, ltrace, and GDB for dynamic analysis and debugging
- readelf, objdump, and nm from GNU binutils for static inspection
- Radare2 for quick binary triage and scripted analysis
- Docker for isolated container-based malware execution
Workflow
Step 1: Identify ELF Binary Properties
Examine the ELF header and basic properties:
# File type identification
file suspect_binary
# Detailed ELF header analysis
readelf -h suspect_binary
# Section headers
readelf -S suspect_binary
# Program headers (segments)
readelf -l suspect_binary
# Symbol table (if not stripped)
readelf -s suspect_binary
nm suspect_binary 2>/dev/null
# Dynamic linking information
readelf -d suspect_binary
ldd suspect_binary 2>/dev/null # Only on matching architecture!
# Compute hashes
md5sum suspect_binary
sha256sum suspect_binary
# Check for packing/UPX
upx -t suspect_binary
# Python-based ELF analysis
from elftools.elf.elffile import ELFFile
import hashlib
with open("suspect_binary", "rb") as f:
data = f.read()
sha256 = hashlib.sha256(data).hexdigest()
with open("suspect_binary", "rb") as f:
elf = ELFFile(f)
print(f"SHA-256: {sha256}")
print(f"Class: {elf.elfclass}-bit")
print(f"Endian: {elf.little_endian and 'Little' or 'Big'}")
print(f"Machine: {elf.header.e_machine}")
print(f"Type: {elf.header.e_type}")
print(f"Entry Point: 0x{elf.header.e_entry:X}")
# Check if stripped
symtab = elf.get_section_by_name('.symtab')
print(f"Stripped: {'Yes' if symtab is None else 'No'}")
# Section entropy analysis
import math
from collections import Counter
for section in elf.iter_sections():
data = section.data()
if len(data) > 0:
entropy = -sum((c/len(data)) * math.log2(c/len(data))
for c in Counter(data).values() if c > 0)
if entropy > 7.0:
print(f" [!] High entropy section: {section.name} ({entropy:.2f})")
What ships with it
3 files beside SKILL.md in the same directory: the scripts, references and assets a skill reads on demand. Not counted in the per-session cost; read them before you install if any of them is executable.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 11d ago First seen · 371 lines · 82 tokens per session scan B 7b94fd7da25d
analyzing-linux-elf-malware is a skill published in the GitHub repository mukul975/Anthropic-Cybersecurity-Skills (32,541 stars, last pushed 10d ago), licensed Apache-2.0. It adds 82 tokens to every session and 3,189 once invoked, about $0.0004 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it B with 2 findings (reaches for credential files, makes network calls). No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other skills, from other repositories
analyzing-linux-elf-malware
Analyzes malicious Linux ELF (Executable and Linkable Format) binaries including botnets, cryptominers, ransomware, and rootkits targeting Linux servers, containers, and cloud infrastructure. Covers static analysis, dynamic tracing, and reverse engineering of x8664 and ARM ELF samples. Activates for requests involving…
analyzing-linux-elf-malware
Analyzes malicious Linux ELF (Executable and Linkable Format) binaries including botnets, cryptominers, ransomware, and rootkits targeting Linux servers, containers, and cloud infrastructure. Covers static analysis, dynamic tracing, and reverse engineering of x8664 and ARM ELF samples. Activates for requests involving…
analyzing-elf-binaries-on-linux
Statically analyzes Linux ELF malware: ELF header and sections, dynamic symbols and imports, segment permissions, embedded strings, and packing indicators to infer capability without execution. Activates for requests to analyze an ELF binary, Linux malware, or shared object.
analyzing-linux-elf-malware
A guide for examining Linux ELF files, the executable format used by Linux programs. It covers static inspection, runtime tracing, and reverse engineering of malware on x86-64, ARM, and MIPS systems.
analyzing-linux-elf-malware
Analyzes malicious Linux ELF (Executable and Linkable Format) binaries including botnets, cryptominers, ransomware, and rootkits targeting Linux servers, containers, and cloud infrastructure. Covers static analysis, dynamic tracing, and reverse engineering of x8664 and ARM ELF samples. Activates for requests involving…
analyzing-linux-elf-malware
Analyzes malicious Linux ELF (Executable and Linkable Format) binaries including botnets, cryptominers, ransomware, and rootkits targeting Linux servers, containers, and cloud infrastructure. Covers static analysis, dynamic tracing, and reverse engineering of x8664 and ARM ELF samples. Activates for requests involving…