Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add mvschwarz/openrig --skill dogfoodgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/mvschwarz/openrigWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/mvschwarz/openrig/dogfood)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/mvschwarz/openrig/dogfood"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/mvschwarz/openrig/dogfood.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00100 | $0.02469 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00050 | $0.01234 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00020 | $0.00494 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00010 | $0.00247 |
Grade A, and why
dogfood scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 8d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
This is a copy
97% identical to dogfood — 5 lines differ, which has more behind it and is treated as the original. This page carries a canonical link to it rather than competing with it.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 226 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Dogfood
Systematically explore a web application, find issues, and produce a report with full reproduction evidence for every finding.
Setup
Only the Target URL is required. Everything else has sensible defaults -- use them unless the user explicitly provides an override.
| Parameter | Default | Example override |
|---|---|---|
| Target URL | (required) | vercel.com, http://localhost:3000 |
| Session name | Slugified domain (e.g., vercel.com -> vercel-com) |
--session my-session |
| Output directory | ./dogfood-output/ |
Output directory: /tmp/qa |
| Scope | Full app | Focus on the billing page |
| Authentication | None | Sign in to [email protected] |
If the user says something like "dogfood vercel.com", start immediately with defaults. Do not ask clarifying questions unless authentication is mentioned but credentials are missing.
Always use agent-browser directly -- never npx agent-browser. The direct binary uses the fast Rust client. npx routes through Node.js and is significantly slower.
Workflow
1. Initialize Set up session, output dirs, report file
2. Authenticate Sign in if needed, save state
3. Orient Navigate to starting point, take initial snapshot
4. Explore Systematically visit pages and test features
5. Document Screenshot + record each issue as found
6. Wrap up Update summary counts, close session
1. Initialize
mkdir -p {OUTPUT_DIR}/screenshots {OUTPUT_DIR}/videos
Copy the report template into the output directory and fill in the header fields:
cp {SKILL_DIR}/templates/dogfood-report-template.md {OUTPUT_DIR}/report.md
Start a named session:
agent-browser --session {SESSION} open {TARGET_URL}
agent-browser --session {SESSION} wait --load networkidle
2. Authenticate
If the app requires login:
agent-browser --session {SESSION} snapshot -i
# Identify login form refs, fill credentials
agent-browser --session {SESSION} fill @e1 "{EMAIL}"
agent-browser --session {SESSION} fill @e2 "{PASSWORD}"
agent-browser --session {SESSION} click @e3
agent-browser --session {SESSION} wait --load networkidle
What ships with it
2 files beside SKILL.md in the same directory: the scripts, references and assets a skill reads on demand. Not counted in the per-session cost; read them before you install if any of them is executable.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 8d ago First seen · 226 lines · 100 tokens per session scan A 8addc5d22813
dogfood is a skill published in the GitHub repository mvschwarz/openrig (66 stars, last pushed yesterday), licensed Apache-2.0. It adds 100 tokens to every session and 2,469 once invoked, about $0.0005 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. It is 97% identical to dogfood, differing in 5 lines, and is treated as a copy.
Other skills, from other repositories
e2e-testing
Guide for running end-to-end tests of the Qwen Code CLI, including headless mode, MCP server testing, and API traffic inspection. Use this skill whenever you need to verify CLI behavior with real model calls, reproduce user-reported bugs end-to-end, test MCP tool integrations, or inspect raw API request/response…
terminal-capture
Automates terminal UI screenshot testing for CLI commands. Applies when reviewing PRs that affect CLI output, testing slash commands (/about, /context, /auth, /export), generating visual documentation, or when 'terminal screenshot', 'CLI test', 'visual test', or 'terminal-capture' is mentioned.
tmux-real-user-testing
A real-user test workflow for Qwen Code's terminal interface, using tmux to drive the program and capture readable screen snapshots. tmux is a tool for running and observing terminal sessions.
agent-reproduce-align
Use after a Codex or Claude Code feature has been implemented in Qwen Code to run the selected reference agent and Qwen Code under the same scenario, capture HTTP and terminal traces, compare request bodies, tool/function schemas, outputs, and iterate until the reproduced behavior is close enough.
verify
Exercise the real app/API/CLI and collect observable evidence; tests alone do not count as end-to-end verification.
webapp-testing
Start/reuse a local app, wait for readiness, inspect rendered state/console/network, act from observed selectors, and verify with evidence.