requesting-code-review

requesting-code-review is a skill for Claude Code, Codex from myths-labs/muse. It costs 22 tokens per session (643 once invoked), scanned A, a copy of requesting-code-review, MIT.

A process for sending completed work to a code reviewer before it is merged. Code review is a technical check of changes against their requirements and the existing codebase.

In plain words
What is it for?
Use it after major features, completed tasks, complex bug fixes, refactoring, or before merging code.
Why use it?
It helps catch specification mistakes and other problems before they spread or reach the main branch.

Skill for Claude CodeCodex

Written for no agent in particular: nothing here depends on one. Also seen: mentions subagents; positional $N argument.

Good fit Use it after major features, completed tasks, complex bug fixes, refactoring, or before merging code.

Compare 6 skills from other repositories ↓
Install with agentmods
npx agentmods add skills/myths-labs/muse/requesting-code-review
Install

Getting it into your agent

One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.

Any agent
npx skills add myths-labs/muse --skill requesting-code-review
Clone the repo
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/myths-labs/muse

Made for: Claude Code, Codex.

Wrote this? Show the measurements

A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.

agentmods badge for requesting-code-review

README.md
[![agentmods](https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/myths-labs/muse/requesting-code-review/github.svg)](https://agentmods.dev/skills/myths-labs/muse/requesting-code-review)
Your own site
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/myths-labs/muse/requesting-code-review"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/myths-labs/muse/requesting-code-review/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>

Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.

agentmods 80×15 button for requesting-code-review

Your own site · 80×15
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/myths-labs/muse/requesting-code-review"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/myths-labs/muse/requesting-code-review.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>
Per session 22 Skills are progressive disclosure: only the name and description are preloaded; the body loads when the skill is used.
When invoked 643 The whole file, excluding the scripts and references it only reads on demand.
Security scan A 0 findings. A grade says what 26 rules found in the file — not that it is safe.
Origin 81% copy Near-identical to another mod in the catalogue.
Token cost

What it costs to keep this loaded

Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.

ModelPer sessionOnce invoked
Fable 5.1 $0.00022 $0.00643
Opus 5 $0.00011 $0.00321
Sonnet 5 $0.00004 $0.00129
Haiku 4.5 $0.00002 $0.00064

Measured 6d ago against content hash 2da31af22a58, method: parsed. Prices are Anthropic first-party input rates as of 2026-09-09, from the pricing page.

Security

Grade A, and why

requesting-code-review scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 6d ago.

A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.

Nothing flagged

None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.

Origin

This is a copy

81% identical to requesting-code-review — 36 lines differ, which has more behind it and is treated as the original. This page carries a canonical link to it rather than competing with it.

skills/toolkit/requesting-code-review/SKILL.md · 106 lines

How it starts

The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 106 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.

Requesting Code Review

Dispatch superpowers:code-reviewer subagent to catch issues before they cascade.

Core principle: Review early, review often.

When to Request Review

Mandatory:

  • After each task in subagent-driven development
  • After completing major feature
  • Before merge to main

Optional but valuable:

  • When stuck (fresh perspective)
  • Before refactoring (baseline check)
  • After fixing complex bug

How to Request

1. Get git SHAs:

BASE_SHA=$(git rev-parse HEAD~1)  # or origin/main
HEAD_SHA=$(git rev-parse HEAD)

2. Dispatch code-reviewer subagent:

Use Task tool with superpowers:code-reviewer type, fill template at code-reviewer.md

Placeholders:

  • {WHAT_WAS_IMPLEMENTED} - What you just built
  • {PLAN_OR_REQUIREMENTS} - What it should do
  • {BASE_SHA} - Starting commit
  • {HEAD_SHA} - Ending commit
  • {DESCRIPTION} - Brief summary

3. Act on feedback:

  • Fix Critical issues immediately
  • Fix Important issues before proceeding
  • Note Minor issues for later
  • Push back if reviewer is wrong (with reasoning)

Example

[Just completed Task 2: Add verification function]

You: Let me request code review before proceeding.

BASE_SHA=$(git log --oneline | grep "Task 1" | head -1 | awk '{print $1}')
HEAD_SHA=$(git rev-parse HEAD)

[Dispatch superpowers:code-reviewer subagent]
  WHAT_WAS_IMPLEMENTED: Verification and repair functions for conversation index
  PLAN_OR_REQUIREMENTS: Task 2 from docs/plans/deployment-plan.md
  BASE_SHA: a7981ec
  HEAD_SHA: 3df7661
  DESCRIPTION: Added verifyIndex() and repairIndex() with 4 issue types

[Subagent returns]:
  Strengths: Clean architecture, real tests
  Issues:
    Important: Missing progress indicators
    Minor: Magic number (100) for reporting interval
  Assessment: Ready to proceed

You: [Fix progress indicators]
[Continue to Task 3]

Integration with Workflows

Subagent-Driven Development:

  • Review after EACH task
  • Catch issues before they compound
  • Fix before moving to next task

Read the full file on GitHub · 106 lines

Changes

What this file has done since we first saw it

Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.

  1. 6d ago First seen · 106 lines · 22 tokens per session scan A 2da31af22a58

Subscribe to this mod's changes

requesting-code-review is a skill published in the GitHub repository myths-labs/muse (32 stars, last pushed 3d ago), licensed MIT. It adds 22 tokens to every session and 643 once invoked, about $0.0001 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. It is 81% identical to requesting-code-review, differing in 36 lines, and is treated as a copy.

Related

Other skills, from other repositories

work-unit-commits

Plan commits as reviewable work units. Trigger: implementation, commit splitting, chained PRs, or keeping tests and docs with code.

Gentleman-Programming/gentle-ai · 33 tokens

git-authoring

Authors and executes git work end to end — Conventional Commits messages, pull-request content, release notes, and pull-request review, plus the repository operations an engineer runs daily: branching, rebasing, squashing, cherry-picking, reverting, merge-conflict resolution, stashes, tags, remotes, and recovery…

n-shadloo/git-authoring · 220 tokens

git-pr-workflows-git-workflow

Orchestrate a comprehensive git workflow from code review through PR creation, leveraging specialized agents for quality assurance, testing, and deployment readiness. This workflow implements modern g.

ratnesh-maurya/cursor-claude-personas · 41 tokens

gentle-ai-collab-perfect

Trigger: contributing to Gentleman-Programming/gentle-ai as an external collaborator. Strict issue-first workflow, honest PR bodies, contributor-vs-maintainer scope, chained-PR strategy, verification protocol, docstring coverage. Load whenever the active repo is Gentleman-Programming/gentle-ai and any part of the…

Gentleman-Programming/gentle-ai · 106 tokens

branch-pr

Create Gentle AI pull requests with issue-first checks. Trigger: creating, opening, or preparing PRs for review.

Gentleman-Programming/gentle-ai · 26 tokens

chained-pr

Trigger: PRs over 400 lines, stacked PRs, review slices. Split oversized changes into chained PRs that protect review focus.

Gentleman-Programming/gentle-ai · 32 tokens