Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add n8n-io/n8n --skill one-off-operationsgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/n8n-io/n8nWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/n8n-io/n8n/one-off-operations)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/n8n-io/n8n/one-off-operations"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/n8n-io/n8n/one-off-operations/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/n8n-io/n8n/one-off-operations"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/n8n-io/n8n/one-off-operations.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>- NVIDIA SkillSpector warn
SkillSpector: 2 findings, up to medium
These are SkillSpector’s own severities. On a checked sample its high-severity flags on skills were ~96% false positives — a documented command, a public API, a “never do X” rule — so we show them as a caution to read, not a verdict. Why →
- medium Excessive Agency · line 65 Skill enables autonomous high-impact decisions without human-in-the-loop verification. Critical operations (destructive commands, financial transactions, data deletion) should require explicit user confirmation.Fix: Add human-in-the-loop confirmation for destructive, irreversible, or high-impact operations. Never auto-execute commands that modify files, send data, or alter system state.
- medium Excessive Agency · line 84 Skill enables autonomous high-impact decisions without human-in-the-loop verification. Critical operations (destructive commands, financial transactions, data deletion) should require explicit user confirmation.Fix: Add human-in-the-loop confirmation for destructive, irreversible, or high-impact operations. Never auto-execute commands that modify files, send data, or alter system state.
What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00123 | $0.01367 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00062 | $0.00683 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00025 | $0.00273 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00012 | $0.00137 |
Grade A, and why
one-off-operations scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 11d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
The source is not reproduced here
A licence we could not identify
The repository carries a LICENSE file, but it is custom or dual enough that GitHub cannot name it and neither can this catalogue. Unknown terms are not permission, so the body is not copied here. Read the licence at the source and decide for yourself.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 11d ago First seen · 112 lines · 123 tokens per session scan A 1d50edbec9d6
one-off-operations is a skill published in the GitHub repository n8n-io/n8n (203,907 stars, last pushed today), with no licence file. It adds 123 tokens to every session and 1,367 once invoked, about $0.0006 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other skills, from other repositories
n8n-workflows
Use when n8n workflow automation — nodes, triggers, expressions, credentials, webhooks, error handling. Use when working with n8n workflows.
n8n-workflow
Automate document workflows with n8n - 7800+ workflow templates.
Automation Architect
Design workflow automations using Zapier, Make, n8n, and other automation tools.
vs-user-onboarding
Guide a brand-new SearchCLI/vs user from first-time usage questions to sign-up, purchase of Viking AI Search, AK/SK setup, and a working authenticated CLI. Use when the user says they downloaded or installed SearchCLI/vs and asks how to use it, how to start, sign up, buy, or onboard.
workflow
Use when a task is too large for turn-by-turn orchestration and should run through the big-task workflow lane: system-wide changes, large migrations, repo-wide audits, high-confidence verification, or tasks explicitly asking to run a workflow. Claude Code uses native dynamic workflows; Codex, OpenCode, and Grok use…
community-research-insight
Extract structured insight briefs from community research transcripts or notes. Produces pain points, stakeholder needs, opportunity maps, risks, and follow-up questions. Requires human review before publication.