Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add nagarjuna-msr/fable-god-mode --skill fable-super-god-modegit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/nagarjuna-msr/fable-god-modeWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/nagarjuna-msr/fable-god-mode/fable-super-god-mode)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/nagarjuna-msr/fable-god-mode/fable-super-god-mode"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/nagarjuna-msr/fable-god-mode/fable-super-god-mode/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/nagarjuna-msr/fable-god-mode/fable-super-god-mode"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/nagarjuna-msr/fable-god-mode/fable-super-god-mode.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00135 | $0.01735 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00068 | $0.00868 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00027 | $0.00347 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00014 | $0.00173 |
Grade A, and why
fable-super-god-mode scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 11d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 143 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Fable Super God Mode
What this adds
This skill adds ONE thing to Fable God Mode: a Codex lane — an OpenAI reviewer (default model gpt-5.6-sol) reached through a vendored one-shot bridge to the Codex CLI. The Codex reviewer acts as Fable's deterministic specialist and independent critic on correctness-heavy work.
Fable God Mode's 10-80-10 discipline still governs everything — Fable 5 plans,
cheaper Claude subagents execute, Fable reviews and owns final quality. Nothing
here replaces or relaxes that loop; see skills/fable-god-mode/SKILL.md
(installed as the fable-god-mode skill). This skill only inserts a second,
independent model at specific correctness checkpoints inside that same loop.
When to use the Codex lane
Keep it gated. Fire the lane for:
- Deterministic / backend / algorithmic work — numeric, boundary, parsing, state-machine, concurrency, data/scoring math, or API-contract correctness.
- Plan critique — before executing a multi-step deterministic plan.
- Diff review — of substantial deterministic changes before finalizing or committing.
- Debugging second opinion — AFTER one failed fix attempt, not before.
Do NOT fire it for creative work, frontend / visual / UX, copy / prose / docs,
conversational turns, or trivial edits — a second model there adds cost without
decisive signal. Full routing detail lives in references/routing.md.
Running a critique
Three steps: write a prompt file, invoke the bridge, read the envelope.
-
Write the prompt file. A plain text/markdown file containing the FULL, self-contained critique request: the task context plus the material to review inline, or paths for Codex to read. The bridge sends only this file (plus a fixed output-contract suffix) — never your environment. Codex runs read-only-sandboxed and may READ files in the working directory only if the prompt points it at paths.
-
Invoke the bridge (Node ≥18, zero dependencies):
node "${CLAUDE_SKILL_DIR}/scripts/ask-codex.mjs" <prompt-file> [--model <id>] [--timeout <seconds>]
What ships with it
4 files beside SKILL.md in the same directory: the scripts, references and assets a skill reads on demand. Not counted in the per-session cost; read them before you install if any of them is executable.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 11d ago First seen · 143 lines · 135 tokens per session scan A 51acef12756b
fable-super-god-mode is a skill published in the GitHub repository nagarjuna-msr/fable-god-mode (10 stars, last pushed 1mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 135 tokens to every session and 1,735 once invoked, about $0.0007 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.
Other skills, from other repositories
quality-gate
Orchestrates the QUALITY pipeline stage for egregore work items, running code review, unbloat, and test updates. Use when running quality checks before a PR.
hatch3r-refactor
Internal code quality improvement workflow without changing external behavior. Use when refactoring code structure, simplifying modules, or improving maintainability.
apply-qa-fixes
Apply QA gate findings then hand back for re-review. Never self-approves or closes. Use when: apply QA fixes, remediate gate FAIL/CONCERNS, /apply-qa-fixes.
aiox-qa
Test Architect & Quality Advisor (Quinn). Use for comprehensive test architecture review, quality gate decisions, and code improvement. Provides thorough analysis including requ...
review
Review the supplied artifact for correctness, security, maintainability, and test coverage. Report concrete findings before general suggestions, and distinguish verified defects from risks.
test-gap-detector
Identify which areas of a proposed change are weakly covered by tests and suggest the minimum high-value tests to add first.