Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx agentmods add skills/naimkatiman/continuous-improvement/recallnpx skills add naimkatiman/continuous-improvement --skill recallgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/naimkatiman/continuous-improvementWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/naimkatiman/continuous-improvement/recall)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/naimkatiman/continuous-improvement/recall"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/naimkatiman/continuous-improvement/recall.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00064 | $0.00700 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00032 | $0.00350 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00013 | $0.00140 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00006 | $0.00070 |
Grade A, and why
recall scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 5d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 51 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Recall — Episodic Search Over Past Sessions
Law 1 says research before executing. The cheapest research is your own history: the exact error you are staring at may have been solved three sessions ago. observations.jsonl already records every tool call, but an append-only log is not searchable. Recall turns that log into a ranked, queryable memory.
When to Activate
- Before tackling a problem that feels familiar ("haven't I seen this error before?").
- Before a risky or destructive operation — check whether a past attempt failed.
- Before reading large files from scratch — a past session may already summarize the relevant facts.
- When onboarding into an unfamiliar area of the codebase that you have touched before.
Core Concept
Recall builds an in-memory BM25 index over the observation rows and answers a query with the most relevant past activity, newest-first on ties:
ci_recall query="permission denied push"
ci_recall query="jq command not found" k=3
ci_recall query="auth login" since=7d
Each result is a past tool call with a redacted snippet, a relevance score, and a timestamp.
Privacy
Snippets are passed through a secret redactor before they are surfaced. AWS access keys, JWT-shaped triplets, bearer tokens, KEY/SECRET/TOKEN/PASSWORD assignments, and long hex strings are masked. The observation log already caps output at 200 characters; redaction is the second layer.
Limitations
- Lexical, not semantic. A query for "login" will not surface activity that only ever said "authentication". Search with the vocabulary that actually appeared in the tool calls, or try several phrasings.
- Scoped to the captured history. Recall only knows what the hooks recorded. Thin-schema rows (no input/output, emitted when the Node observer is not wired) contribute little signal.
- In-memory rebuild per query. Dependency-free and fast at current volumes; a
node:sqliteFTS5 index is a planned follow-up if the log grows past ~100k rows.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 5d ago First seen · 51 lines · 64 tokens per session scan A a0a3798d7834
recall is a skill published in the GitHub repository naimkatiman/continuous-improvement (7 stars, last pushed 11d ago), licensed MIT. It adds 64 tokens to every session and 700 once invoked, about $0.0003 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.
Other skills, from other repositories
remember
Review auto-memory entries and propose promotions to CLAUDE.md, CLAUDE.local.md, or shared memory. Also detects outdated, conflicting, and duplicate entries across memory layers.
reflect
Per-project self-improvement - reads the .harness ledger and feedback memories, then proposes gated rule/threshold/ADR changes so the project stops repeating mistakes. Run periodically.
ucai-patterns
Use when the user asks about Claude Code best practices, how to write agents, how to use hooks, how to manage context, or how to work effectively with Claude Code's native systems.
dream
Memory consolidation - review, merge, prune, and index memory files. Run periodically to keep memories organized and up-to-date.
meta-synthesis
Reads /context/skill-sessions.md (the session log every execution skill writes to) to detect patterns that repeat across 2+ sessions, proposes new guardrails for /context/meta-patterns.md, and proposes brain updates for confirmed learnings. Run on-demand or roughly weekly — not a scheduled background job. Trigger on…
meta-learn
Deliberate deep-dive capture for a completed skill session that deserves more than the automatic one-line row every T1/T2 skill already logs at its own close — asks three extraction questions (what surprised you, what was wrong, what was missing), turns real answers into specific, falsifiable pattern statements, and…