Borrowing it
Nothing to install: this file belongs to Nam-Cheol/namba-ai. Take a copy, put it at the same path in your own repository, and replace the rules that are about this project with yours.
curl -O https://raw.githubusercontent.com/Nam-Cheol/namba-ai/main/.agents/skills/namba-create/SKILL.mdgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/Nam-Cheol/namba-aiWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/nam-cheol/namba-ai/namba-create)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/nam-cheol/namba-ai/namba-create"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/nam-cheol/namba-ai/namba-create/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/nam-cheol/namba-ai/namba-create"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/nam-cheol/namba-ai/namba-create.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00025 | $0.00862 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00013 | $0.00431 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00005 | $0.00172 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00003 | $0.00086 |
Grade A, and why
namba-create scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 9d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 35 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
State effect: preview-first mutation. Do not write repo-local skills or agents until the preview is confirmed.
Generated instruction contract for this command skill:
- Purpose: keep the role or command scope explicit, bounded, and testable.
- Boundary: honor read-only versus mutating state effects, configured sandbox mode, and assigned file or workflow ownership.
- Required output: report concrete actions, changed paths or artifacts, validation evidence, and pass/fail status or blockers.
- Pass/fail criteria: claim success only when acceptance criteria and configured validation are satisfied; otherwise name the exact blocker and impact.
- Evidence expectations: cite source artifacts such as SPEC files,
.namba/configs, diffs, test output, PR/check links, or generated manifests instead of relying on unsupported assertions. - Security responsibilities: never expose or commit secrets; treat auth, privacy, destructive commands, permission changes, and external network or credential use as security-sensitive.
- Destructive command and escalation policy: do not run destructive commands unless explicitly requested; request approval for privileged, networked, or sandbox-blocked actions only when the active approval mode allows it, and otherwise report the blocker or use a safe non-escalating path.
- Fallback implementer boundary: if a specialist path is unavailable and the main/default implementer takes over, stay within the assigned scope and preserve the same evidence and validation duties.
- Portability: keep durable guidance non-project-specific unless the current repository config or SPEC explicitly provides the project detail.
Use this skill when the user explicitly says $namba-create or asks to create a repo-local skill, a project-scoped custom agent, or both through Namba.
Behavior:
- Keep this flow skill-first. Do not introduce a documented public
namba createGo CLI command as part of this slice. - Use progressive disclosure for generated guidance: keep
SKILL.mdbodies lean and place long procedures in references, assets, or deterministic helper candidates. Do not add$CODEX_HOME/skills, third-party install flows, or app-automation dependencies. - When the installed
nambaCLI is available, use the internal adapternamba __create previewandnamba __create applywith JSON stdin/stdout as the durable generation path. Treat__createas wrapper-only plumbing, not a public command. - Run the interaction as a staged generator:
unresolved->narrowed->confirmed. - Keep each turn stateful and visible: summarize the current candidate target and the remaining unresolved items before asking the next clarifying question.
- If the user explicitly says
skill,agent, orboth, treat that directive as authoritative over any heuristic classification. - Use
sequential-thinkingwhen decomposition or clarification planning is non-trivial, usecontext7only when targeted external library or framework guidance materially helps the generated instructions, and useplaywrightonly when browser verification is actually relevant. - Before any write, present a non-mutating preview that includes the chosen output type, slug or name, intended file paths, validation plan, whether a fresh Codex session will likely be required, and the planned five-role analysis or verification record.
- Do not write files until the target, slug, paths, and overwrite decisions are explicit and the user has confirmed the preview.
- Normalize names into a safe slug, constrain writes to
.agents/skills/<slug>/SKILL.md,.codex/agents/<slug>.toml, and.codex/agents/<slug>.md, and reject path traversal, invalid slugs, silent overwrites, or incomplete agent mirror pairs. - Reject durable instructions that preserve raw unnormalized user prose, stale Claude-only primitives, or repository-policy violations.
- Record at least five independent role outputs across planning or verification when the flow advances to generation, while degrading safely if the effective same-workspace thread limit is lower than the repo default.
- Keep user-authored outputs distinct from Namba-managed built-ins so
namba regenpreserves them, and surface fresh-session guidance clearly when instruction surfaces change.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 9d ago First seen · 35 lines · 25 tokens per session scan A 6e6180fce938
namba-create is a skill published in the GitHub repository Nam-Cheol/namba-ai (11 stars, last pushed 17d ago), licensed MIT. It adds 25 tokens to every session and 862 once invoked, about $0.0001 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other skills, from other repositories
agf
Find local coding-agent sessions, inspect bounded metadata or summaries, and prepare a read-only resume plan with AGF. Use for finding prior work across agent CLIs, not for executing agents, deleting sessions, or reading full transcripts.
dynamic-resources
Example skill loaded from resourcesdiscover.
repo-hygiene
Use when the scheduled repo-hygiene workflow runs from GitHub Actions (or an operator dry-run) to scan the repository for small, certain docs/test/code hygiene issues and fix them as one batched branch.
find-simplifications
Use for a periodic repo-wide sweep of qwen-code for accumulated excess surface — dead components and files, orphaned locale keys, exports nothing consumes, added-then-removed scaffolding — filing candidates on a tracking issue and landing only what a maintainer has said yes to. Repo-wide and evidence-first; every…
swarm-pr-review
Run a graph-guided, tool-augmented PR review using context packing, parallel exploration, mandatory repository-agnostic risk-family coverage with dispatch scaled to diff size and risk, independent reviewer validation, critic challenge, and metrics writeback. Use for deep pull request review with low false-positive…
bundle-safety
Bundle transform safety — minification variant selection, consumer-constraint verification, identifier preservation, and namespace re-export coverage for build output.