Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add Natsummerance/readMD --skill readmd-code-reviewgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/Natsummerance/readMDWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/natsummerance/readmd/readmd-code-review)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/natsummerance/readmd/readmd-code-review"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/natsummerance/readmd/readmd-code-review/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/natsummerance/readmd/readmd-code-review"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/natsummerance/readmd/readmd-code-review.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00024 | $0.00092 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00010 | $0.00037 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00005 | $0.00018 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00002 | $0.00009 |
Grade A, and why
readmd-code-review scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 1mo ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
What it actually says
Review the code in the document for bugs, security risks, performance issues, portability, readability, and test gaps. Rank findings by severity, explain evidence, and provide focused fixes or examples. Distinguish confirmed defects from hypotheses.
Language: {{language}} Additional request: {{request}} Document: {{document}}
What ships with it
1 file beside SKILL.md in the same directory: the scripts, references and assets a skill reads on demand. Not counted in the per-session cost; read them before you install if any of them is executable.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 1mo ago First seen · 11 lines · 24 tokens per session scan A 66c4948284a0
readmd-code-review is a skill published in the GitHub repository Natsummerance/readMD (26 stars, last pushed 9d ago), licensed MIT. It adds 24 tokens to every session and 92 once invoked, about $0.0001 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other skills, from other repositories
trellis-check
Comprehensive quality verification: spec compliance, lint, type-check, tests, cross-layer data flow, code reuse, and consistency checks. Use when code is written and needs quality verification, before committing changes, or to catch context drift during long sessions.
persona-review
A format for writing short pull-request review comments, with each comment naming the location, problem, fix, and severity. A pull request is a proposed code change for review.
aetox-code-review
ตอนต้องรีวิว diff, PR, คอมมิต หรือการเปลี่ยนแปลงก่อน merge หรือถูกถามว่าโค้ดนี้ปลอดภัย/ถูกต้องไหม.
pr-workflow
How to open a pull request that gets reviewed, and how to review one properly. Use when opening, describing, reviewing, updating or merging a PR.
aetox-review-feedback
ตอนได้รับฟีดแบ็กจากการรีวิวโค้ด ไม่ว่าจากผู้ใช้หรือคนนอก ก่อนจะลงมือแก้ตาม.
release-pr-review
Review pass on an open release PR (release/ → main) — the step between git-wrapup and release-and-publish when a project releases in gated release PR mode. Reads the PR's commit range through the code-simplifier lens plus a correctness review, verifies whatever an automated reviewer left on the PR, lands fixes as…