Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx agentmods add skills/natsummerance/readmd/strategistnpx skills add Natsummerance/readMD --skill strategistgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/Natsummerance/readMDWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/natsummerance/readmd/strategist)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/natsummerance/readmd/strategist"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/natsummerance/readmd/strategist.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00000 | $0.05001 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00000 | $0.02500 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00000 | $0.01000 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00000 | $0.00500 |
Grade A, and why
academic-paper-strategist scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 5d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
This is a copy
100% identical to academic-paper-strategist — 0 lines differ, which has more behind it and is treated as the original. This page carries a canonical link to it rather than competing with it.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 671 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Academic Paper Strategist
Overview
This skill provides a systematic framework for strategic planning of academic papers in philosophy and interdisciplinary research. It guides you through three phases—from platform selection to optimized outline—with AI-driven literature search, research gap identification, originality assessment, and quality-controlled outline design.
Output: A detailed, review-ready paper outline with supporting documentation (platform style guide, literature review, gap analysis, reviewer assessment).
Companion Skill: Use academic-paper-composer to execute the outline and write the full paper.
When to Use This Skill
Use academic-paper-strategist when you need to:
Planning Stage:
- Design a research paper from initial idea to structured outline
- Identify a suitable publication platform (PhilArchive, arXiv, etc.)
- Understand writing standards for a specific preprint platform
Research Stage:
- Conduct systematic literature search
- Identify research gaps with evidence
- Assess originality of your research idea
- Predict potential impact
Design Stage:
- Structure paper chapters and arguments
- Optimize outline from reviewer perspective
- Prepare submission-ready strategy
Triggers:
- "Plan a paper on [topic]"
- "Help me design a paper about [subject]"
- "Identify research gaps in [field]"
- "Is this idea original?"
- "What platform should I submit to?"
Workflow Overview
Phase 1: PLATFORM ANALYSIS (Target Selection + Style Learning)
↓
Phase 2: THEORETICAL FRAMEWORK (AI-Driven Gap Identification)
↓
Phase 3: OUTLINE OPTIMIZATION (Quality-Controlled Design)
↓
Output: Detailed Outline + Supporting Documentation
Quality Gates: 3 validation checkpoints ensure each phase meets standards before proceeding.
Phase 1: Platform Analysis
Goal
Identify the optimal submission platform and understand its writing standards through systematic sample paper analysis.
What ships with it
4 files beside SKILL.md in the same directory: the scripts, references and assets a skill reads on demand. Not counted in the per-session cost; read them before you install if any of them is executable.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 5d ago First seen · 671 lines · 0 tokens per session scan A a68c003ffdd6
academic-paper-strategist is a skill published in the GitHub repository Natsummerance/readMD (22 stars, last pushed yesterday), licensed MIT. It costs nothing until one of its globs matches a file; then it loads 5,001 tokens. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. It is 100% identical to academic-paper-strategist, differing in 0 lines, and is treated as a copy.
Other skills, from other repositories
gonavi-cli
Operate databases through the GoNavi headless CLI — the gonavi executable shipped in verified GitHub Release archives. Covers listing/adding/importing saved connections, running SQL queries against saved connections or ad-hoc connection files, exporting result sets to csv/json/md/html/xlsx, batch-executing SQL files…
bibverify
Verify, repair, explain, and generate BibTeX references with Bibverify's DOI-first CLI and MCP tools.
electron-expert
Expert in Electron framework, desktop app development, IPC, and cross-platform packaging. Use when the user mentions desktop, Node.js, cross platform, Windows, macOS, or Linux, or when the task involves Electron Architecture, Process Types, IPC Communication, or App Lifecycle.
memory
Use this skill when Pioneer should proactively use durable memory or recalled context: decide whether memory can improve a turn, answer from remembered user/project facts, request memory tools, search/list/get stored memories, save durable preferences or project decisions, forget memories, audit or clean up memory, or…
trellis-brainstorm
Guides collaborative requirements discovery before implementation. Creates task directory, seeds PRD, asks high-value questions one at a time, researches technical choices, and converges on MVP scope. Use when requirements are unclear, there are multiple valid approaches, or the user describes a new feature or complex…
trellis-update-spec
Captures executable contracts and coding conventions into .trellis/spec/ documents. Use when learning something valuable from debugging, implementing, or discussion that should be preserved for future sessions.