Borrowing it
Nothing to install: this file belongs to nawodyaishan/universal-mcp-sync. Take a copy, put it at the same path in your own repository, and replace the rules that are about this project with yours.
curl -O https://raw.githubusercontent.com/nawodyaishan/universal-mcp-sync/main/.gemini/skills/agentic-sdd-verification-review/SKILL.mdgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/nawodyaishan/universal-mcp-syncWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/nawodyaishan/universal-mcp-sync/agentic-sdd-verification-review)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/nawodyaishan/universal-mcp-sync/agentic-sdd-verification-review"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/nawodyaishan/universal-mcp-sync/agentic-sdd-verification-review/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/nawodyaishan/universal-mcp-sync/agentic-sdd-verification-review"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/nawodyaishan/universal-mcp-sync/agentic-sdd-verification-review.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00029 | $0.00535 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00015 | $0.00267 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00006 | $0.00107 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00003 | $0.00053 |
Grade A, and why
agentic-sdd-verification-review scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 11d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 103 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Agentic SDD Verification Review
Use this skill after implementation and before merge or release.
Goal
Prove the implementation matches the approved artifacts and is safe to review or merge.
Required Reading
.specify/memory/constitution.mdspecs/<feature>/spec.mdspecs/<feature>/plan.mdspecs/<feature>/tasks.mdspecs/<feature>/test-plan.md, if presentspecs/<feature>/contracts/, if present- relevant ADRs
- git diff or changed files
Verification Commands
Run applicable checks when available:
- format
- lint
- typecheck
- unit tests
- integration tests
- build
- security scan
- dependency review
- secret scan
- e2e or browser checks for UI work
Do not claim success for checks that were not run.
Review Checklist
Assess:
- implementation matches spec and acceptance criteria
- implementation matches approved plan and tasks
- no unrelated behavior changed
- no forbidden files changed
- tests cover core behavior and regression risk
- external inputs are validated
- error states are represented clearly
- auth and authorization remain correct
- no secrets are committed
- dependencies are approved
- logging is useful and not noisy
- docs, contracts, ADRs, and release notes are updated where relevant
- no spec drift exists
Review Output
Use this structure:
Status: Approved | Needs changes | Blocked
Blocking findings:
- file:line - issue
Non-blocking suggestions:
- file:line - suggestion
Verification:
- command - passed/failed/not run, reason
Spec drift:
- none found
- or required artifact updates
Stop Conditions
Do not approve when:
- verification fails for relevant behavior
- implementation diverges from spec or plan
- high-risk changes lack approval
- test coverage is missing for changed behavior
- contracts or docs are stale
- secrets or unsafe config are present
Artifact Updates
If requested, update:
specs/<feature>/review.mdspecs/<feature>/test-plan.mdspecs/<feature>/drift-report.md- release notes
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 11d ago First seen · 103 lines · 29 tokens per session scan A e5109d63532d
agentic-sdd-verification-review is a skill published in the GitHub repository nawodyaishan/universal-mcp-sync (6 stars, last pushed 1mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 29 tokens to every session and 535 once invoked, about $0.0001 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.
Other skills, from other repositories
find-simplifications
Use for a periodic repo-wide sweep of qwen-code for accumulated excess surface — dead components and files, orphaned locale keys, exports nothing consumes, added-then-removed scaffolding — filing candidates on a tracking issue and landing only what a maintainer has said yes to. Repo-wide and evidence-first; every…
swarm-pr-review
Run a graph-guided, tool-augmented PR review using context packing, parallel exploration, mandatory repository-agnostic risk-family coverage with dispatch scaled to diff size and risk, independent reviewer validation, critic challenge, and metrics writeback. Use for deep pull request review with low false-positive…
review
Validate plans, execution, or PRs against wish criteria — returns SHIP / FIX-FIRST / BLOCKED with severity-tagged gaps.
include-test-files-that-assert-on-behavior-being-changed-in-decl
When delegating a task affected by this skill, include.
review
Adversarial fresh-context review of an increment before it ships. Every finding cites path:line and is re-verified. Use when saying "review", "grill this", or "critique the implementation".
tech-debt-ci-review
Codex adapter for deep technical-debt and CI-stability audits. Use when asked to find test theater, flaky tests, missing or mis-scoped tests, brittle CI/toolchain behavior, structural debt blocking green PRs, or a remediation order for opencode-swarm.