github-pr

A Kotlin/JVM project template with example calculator code and preconfigured build, code-quality, testing, and continuous-integration setup.

In plain words
What is it for?
Use it to bootstrap a Kotlin/JVM project, rename its package and application, and replace the placeholder example code.
Why use it?
It gives new Kotlin projects a prepared starting structure instead of requiring their tooling and checks to be assembled from scratch.

Skill for Claude CodeCodex

Part of the user-testing-agent plugin — 14 skills, 10 commands shipped together

Install

Getting it into your agent

One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.

agentmods
npx agentmods add skills/ncklrs/claude-chrome-user-testing/github-pr
Any agent
npx skills add ncklrs/claude-chrome-user-testing --skill github-pr
Clone the repo
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/ncklrs/claude-chrome-user-testing

Made for: Claude Code, Codex.

Or install user-testing-agent, the plugin that ships this one along with the rest of its 14 skills, 10 commands.

Per session 0 Skills are progressive disclosure: only the name and description are preloaded; the body loads when the skill is used.
When invoked 1,331 The whole file, excluding the scripts and references it only reads on demand.
Security scan A 0 findings. Scan, not verified.
Origin original No closer match found in the catalogue.
Token cost

What it costs to keep this loaded

Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.

ModelPer sessionOnce invoked
Fable 5 $0.00000 $0.01331
Opus 5 $0.00000 $0.00665
Sonnet 5 $0.00000 $0.00266
Haiku 4.5 $0.00000 $0.00133

Measured 3d ago against content hash 906a6e844ff8, method: parsed. Prices are Anthropic first-party input rates as of 2026-08-30, from the pricing page.

Security

Grade A, and why

github-pr scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 3d ago.

A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.

Nothing flagged

None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.

skills/github-pr/SKILL.md · 229 lines

How it starts

The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 229 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.

GitHub PR Comments Skill

Post user testing results as GitHub PR comments for CI/CD integration.

When to Use

  • Running tests in CI/CD pipelines
  • Automated testing on PR preview deployments
  • Sharing test results with reviewers
  • Tracking UX regressions across PRs

Prerequisites

  • gh CLI installed and authenticated
  • In GitHub Actions: GITHUB_TOKEN is automatically available
  • PR write permissions (pull-requests: write)

Flag

--pr <number>     Post results as comment on PR #<number>

Comment Format

Structure

<!-- user-test-results:[persona-id] -->
## User Test Results: [Persona Name]

**Status:** [badge] | **Tested:** [timestamp]

| Metric | Value |
|--------|-------|
| URL | `https://...` |
| Persona | [name] ([id]) |
| Viewport | [viewport] |
| Network | [network] |
| Duration | [duration]s |

### Summary
- Tasks: X/Y completed
- Critical Issues: N
- Major Issues: N
- Minor Issues: N

<details>
<summary>Issues Found (N)</summary>

#### Critical
...

#### Major
...

#### Minor
...

</details>

<details>
<summary>Screenshots</summary>

[Links to screenshots/trace if --record used]

</details>

---
*Tested with [user-testing-agent](https://github.com/ncklrs/claude-chrome-user-testing)*

Status Badges

Status Badge When
Pass PASS All tasks completed, no critical issues
Fail FAIL Critical issues found or tasks failed
Issues ISSUES Tasks completed but major/minor issues exist

Posting Logic

Simple Post

gh pr comment $PR_NUMBER --body "$COMMENT_BODY"

Update Existing (Recommended)

Prevents comment spam on re-runs by updating existing comment:

# Marker includes persona ID to allow multiple persona comments
MARKER="<!-- user-test-results:$PERSONA_ID -->"

# Check for existing comment with this marker
EXISTING=$(gh pr view $PR_NUMBER --json comments \
  --jq ".comments[] | select(.body | contains(\"$MARKER\")) | .databaseId" \
  | head -1)

if [ -n "$EXISTING" ]; then
  # Update existing comment
  gh api repos/{owner}/{repo}/issues/comments/$EXISTING \
    -X PATCH \
    -f body="$COMMENT_BODY"
  echo "Updated existing comment"
else
  # Create new comment
  gh pr comment $PR_NUMBER --body "$COMMENT_BODY"
  echo "Created new comment"
fi

Read the full file on GitHub · 229 lines

Changes

What this file has done since we first saw it

Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.

  1. 3d ago First seen · 229 lines · 0 tokens per session scan A 906a6e844ff8

Subscribe to this mod's changes

github-pr is a skill published in the GitHub repository ncklrs/claude-chrome-user-testing (19 stars, last pushed 7mo ago), licensed MIT. It costs nothing until one of its globs matches a file; then it loads 1,331 tokens. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.