Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add nebius/nebius-physical-ai --skill curobogit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/nebius/nebius-physical-aiWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/nebius/nebius-physical-ai/curobo)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/nebius/nebius-physical-ai/curobo"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/nebius/nebius-physical-ai/curobo/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/nebius/nebius-physical-ai/curobo"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/nebius/nebius-physical-ai/curobo.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00045 | $0.01396 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00023 | $0.00698 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00009 | $0.00279 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00005 | $0.00140 |
Grade A, and why
curobo scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 4d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 112 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
cuRobo V2 motion planning
The image candidate remains 0.8.0-cuda13-b300-unbuilt and publication-quarantined
until built-image checks and real GPU validation pass. Build from committed inputs;
build.sh checks scoped source cleanliness and archives the exact commit for Docker.
The tag family does not establish B300 validation.
For image changes, inspect actual dependency wheels and base layers. The cuDNN development base carries headers; deleting inherited files in a later layer does not remove those bytes. This image uses a non-cuDNN CUDA base and filters the locked cuDNN wheel inside its installation RUN, retaining only shared runtime libraries and notices. The bundled older and current cuDNN supplements differ on headers; preserve both evidence and use the common runtime boundary. Keep the filter's version/inventory checks, then inspect every built layer before publication. Passing its source tests does not establish clean image bytes.
Run the GPU workflow on Nebius through the ordinary workflow submit path:
npa workbench workflow validate-spec workflows/testing/curobo-benchmark.yaml
npa workbench workflow submit workflows/testing/curobo-benchmark.yaml --var bucket=<your-bucket>
This is the complete benchmark: both pinned datasets, in kinematic and 3 kg
payload dynamics modes. curobo_mode=kinematic|dynamics selects one complete
configuration. Do not silently replace either dataset with the upstream demo
or add problem/time/job limits. The golden evaluation separately qualifies one
real pose; it does not prove full-benchmark completion.
Exact implementation and limits
- Source is cuRobo V2 at
8e734f3ced1df898990bcd92de40abce475907db, usingMotionPlannerandMotionPlannerCfg. V1MotionGenexamples are incompatible. - Raw benchmark datasets are robometrics
81e3d1d605de84100d8ab880b43096aba221a48b. V2 source and Franka assets are Apache-2.0; dataset/source MIT and MotionBenchMaker BSD notices are retained. No weights, gated access or model-acceptance switch is required. - The benchmark calls upstream's configuration loader, including its relaxed
joint limits (0.2 radians), obstacle-to-OBB conversion and optimizer settings.
Negative
collision_buffer_ikinputs remain recorded as invalid. - Every input contributes to the full denominator. Eligible success is reported separately. Failed solves remain failed; inverse-dynamics errors fail the job instead of becoming zero energy. FK path lengths are computed from actual tool positions, not upstream's placeholder end-effector metrics.
- A matching total count is insufficient evidence. Validate exact problem
identities and invalid indices against
benchmark_inventory.py, independently derived from the pinned YAML with file hashes. The runner checks those bytes, and report validation requires the known metrics for every status plus sample timeline consistency. Do not accept a self-consistent but invented journal. - Energy is a Pinocchio inverse-dynamics proxy on the optimized joint trajectory. Planner success is upstream feasibility, not independent collision certification or authorization to move physical hardware.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 4d ago First seen · 112 lines · 45 tokens per session scan A 96eafb58c05b
curobo is a skill published in the GitHub repository nebius/nebius-physical-ai (29 stars, last pushed today), licensed Apache-2.0. It adds 45 tokens to every session and 1,396 once invoked, about $0.0002 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-09-07.
Other skills, from other repositories
neuroskill-bci
Use live BCI cognitive and mood state from NeuroSkill.
ruview-advanced-sensing
Advanced RuView capabilities — RuvSense multistatic sensing (attention-weighted fusion, geometric diversity, persistent field model), cross-viewpoint fusion across multiple nodes, RF tomography (ISTA L1 solver, voxel grids), longitudinal biomechanics drift, pre-movement intention signals, adversarial signal detection…
ruview-applications
Run RuView sensing applications — presence/occupancy, breathing & heart rate, activity & fall detection, 17-keypoint pose estimation (WiFlow), sleep monitoring & apnea screening, environment mapping, Mass Casualty Assessment (MAT), and the 3D point-cloud fusion demo. Use when someone wants to actually do something…
lab-hardware-cad
Design custom laboratory hardware as parametric build123d models and export fabrication-ready STEP, STL, and DXF files - microfluidic chips and molds, optomechanical mounts and breadboard adapters, cuvette and microplate holders, tube racks, animal-behavior rigs, and 3D-printed instrument fixtures. Use when a research…
opentrons-integration
Author, review, migrate, simulate, and troubleshoot official Opentrons Python Protocol API v2 protocols for Flex and OT-2 robots. Use for robot-specific liquid handling, deck and labware setup, pipettes, modules, runtime parameters, liquid classes, and Opentrons App analysis. Use pylabrobot instead when one workflow…
pylabrobot
Develop and review PyLabRobot lab-automation resources, liquid-handling plans, offline simulations, and supported-device integrations. Use for PyLabRobot protocols or API questions; keep physical execution behind an explicit operator safety gate.