Context Engineering Kit is a collection of skills, agents, hooks, instructions, commands, and plugins that shape how coding agents use context and carry out development work. It is for developers using Claude Code and other supported coding agents who want more predictable results. The catalogue entries are components from this collection.
Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add NeoLabHQ/context-engineering-kit --skill traiage-reviewgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/NeoLabHQ/context-engineering-kitWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/neolabhq/context-engineering-kit/traiage-review)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/neolabhq/context-engineering-kit/traiage-review"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/neolabhq/context-engineering-kit/traiage-review/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/neolabhq/context-engineering-kit/traiage-review"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/neolabhq/context-engineering-kit/traiage-review.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00022 | $0.02264 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00011 | $0.01132 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00004 | $0.00453 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00002 | $0.00226 |
Grade B, and why
traiage-review scanned grade B with 2 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 7d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Unrestricted tool accessmediumExcessive agency
A wildcard tool grant or "run any command" leaves no least-privilege boundary at all.
- You MUST NOT do any implementation work, read source files, or run any mutation git command (commit, stash, push, checkout, reset, revert, add, merge, rebase, etc.). If you try to read source files or run any command o Runs shell commandslowCapability
Expected in a hook, worth knowing in a rule or an instructions file.
tracked = subprocess.check_output(['git', 'diff', '--name-only', 'HEAD']).decode('utf-8').splitlines() The source is not reproduced here
Licensed GPL-3.0
The repository is licensed GPL-3.0, which this catalogue does not treat as permission to reproduce the file. Read it at the source.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 7d ago First seen · 199 lines · 22 tokens per session scan B 14f4a82446af
traiage-review is a skill published in the GitHub repository NeoLabHQ/context-engineering-kit (1,682 stars, last pushed 14d ago), licensed GPL-3.0. It adds 22 tokens to every session and 2,264 once invoked, about $0.0001 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it B with 2 findings (unrestricted tool access, runs shell commands). No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-09-03.
Other skills, from other repositories
review-architecture
Architecture-focused monorepo review. USE WHEN: user runs /review-architecture or explicitly asks for this review. DO NOT USE WHEN: implementing features or fixing bugs unless the user asked for a review.
review-code-quality
Lint, style, maintainability review. USE WHEN: user runs /review-code-quality or explicitly asks for this review. DO NOT USE WHEN: implementing features or fixing bugs unless the user asked for a review.
review-configuration
Config, env, wrangler review. USE WHEN: user runs /review-configuration or explicitly asks for this review. DO NOT USE WHEN: implementing features or fixing bugs unless the user asked for a review.
review
Full multi-dimension code/PR/docs review → structured plan. USE WHEN: user runs /review or explicitly asks for this review. DO NOT USE WHEN: implementing features or fixing bugs unless the user asked for a review.
review-oxc
OXC review (oxlint rules/ignores, oxfmt, tsgolint type-aware rules, agent output format) against current official OXC best practices. USE WHEN: user runs /review-oxc or explicitly asks for this review. DO NOT USE WHEN: reviewing app code, other dev dependencies, or implementing features.
review-vite
Vite setup review (front-app vite.config.ts, build/performance options, @cloudflare/vite-plugin, devtools) against current official Vite best practices. USE WHEN: user runs /review-vite or explicitly asks for this review. DO NOT USE WHEN: reviewing app code, other dev dependencies, or implementing features.