Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add Netflix-Skunkworks/oci-agent --skill suggesting-remediesgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/Netflix-Skunkworks/oci-agentWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/netflix-skunkworks/oci-agent/suggesting-remedies)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/netflix-skunkworks/oci-agent/suggesting-remedies"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/netflix-skunkworks/oci-agent/suggesting-remedies/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/netflix-skunkworks/oci-agent/suggesting-remedies"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/netflix-skunkworks/oci-agent/suggesting-remedies.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>- NVIDIA SkillSpector pass
What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00085 | $0.00772 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00034 | $0.00309 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00017 | $0.00154 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00009 | $0.00077 |
Grade A, and why
suggesting-remedies scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 2mo ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
What it actually says
- Trimming, raising ATO_THRESHOLD, or any sample restriction by propensity changes the estimand from the ATE to the ATO (at the chosen threshold). Never suggest "trim the ATE" or an "ATE trimming threshold" — those are contradictions. Suggest switching the estimand to ATO instead, and call out the estimand change explicitly.
Covariate Balance
- A failure means treatment and control units differ systematically in at least one confounder.
- Most likely affects the ATE — not every population covariate profile is well-represented in all treatment levels.
- Remedies: switch the estimand to ATT or ATO; raise ATO_THRESHOLD above 0.1 to trim extreme propensities; manually trim units with extreme values of the problematic covariates.
- Note in the report that all three remedies change the estimand away from the ATE.
Overlap
- A warning means many units have propensity scores near 0 or 1 (near-deterministic assignment).
- Not a hard fail — the estimator stays consistent — but extreme inverse weights cause instability and make counterfactuals depend on a few observations.
- Remedies: switch the estimand to ATT or ATO; trim by raising ATO_THRESHOLD. Note that trimming changes the estimand to the ATO at the chosen threshold.
Placebo
- A warning means a placebo outcome — known to be unaffected by treatment — has a statistically significant effect after adjustment.
- Not disqualifying: the placebo outcome is already controlled for in the actual analysis.
- The report MUST state that a placebo failure signals (a) high sensitivity of the results to a single confounder, and (b) likely residual confounding from variables the model has not captured.
- Primary remedy (MUST appear in suggestions whenever placebo warns): find and add covariates that explain the placebo outcome. These are the variables most likely driving the residual confounding. Identify candidates by training a model with the placebo as the target and inspecting which existing covariates have the highest feature importance — then add covariates that capture the same signal as those drivers.
- If the spec's covariate set already exhausts what's available in the dataset (e.g., the eval uses every x_* column), the report MUST explicitly state that the dataset may be insufficient for a credible analysis. Do not silently fall through to model-flexibility remedies.
- Propensity / outcome model flexibility (see Propensity model below) is a secondary remedy for placebo failures — list it only after the covariate-set remedy or the dataset-insufficiency note, never as the headline placebo response.
Propensity model
- Covariate balance failures and placebo warnings often indicate the propensity model is misspecified — it isn't capturing the true treatment-assignment process.
- Remedies: enable AUGMENT_CONTINUOUS_COVARIATES to add polynomial and bin-encoded versions of continuous features; switch to a more flexible propensity learner (e.g., gradient-boosted or deeper trees).
- These remedies do not change the estimand.
- If the propensity learner is already a flexible nonlinear model (e.g., XGBoost / LightGBM with sufficient depth and trees), augmentation is less likely to help — prefer adding more covariates, or accept that some confounding may be unobserved.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 2mo ago First seen · 39 lines · 85 tokens per session scan A b40cfc0cc632
suggesting-remedies is a skill published in the GitHub repository Netflix-Skunkworks/oci-agent (153 stars, last pushed 2mo ago), licensed Apache-2.0. It adds 85 tokens to every session and 772 once invoked, about $0.0003 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
suggesting-remedies compared with skills from other repositories
| Mod | Type | Stars | Last push | Licence | Scan | Tokens | Works with |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| suggesting-remediesNetflix-Skunkworks/oci-agent | Skill | 153 | 2mo ago | Apache-2.0 | A | 85 | Claude Code, Codex |
| instrument-data-to-allotropeanthropics/knowledge-work-plugins | Skill | 35k | 2d ago | Apache-2.0 | A | 123 | Claude Code |
| exploratory-data-analysisK-Dense-AI/scientific-agent-skills | Skill | 56k | 4d ago | MIT | A | 83 | Claude Code |
| matlabK-Dense-AI/scientific-agent-skills | Skill | 56k | 4d ago | MIT | A | 44 | Claude Code |
| phylogeneticsK-Dense-AI/scientific-agent-skills | Skill | 56k | 4d ago | MIT | A | 71 | Claude Code, Codex |
| research-engineerdavila7/claude-code-templates | Skill | 33k | yesterday | MIT | A | 43 | Claude Code, Codex |
| mapping-to-snomedmaziyarpanahi/openmed | Skill | 5.8k | yesterday | Apache-2.0 | A | 205 | Claude Code |