Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add NeuroGhostDev/booster_mcp --skill booster-reviewgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/NeuroGhostDev/booster_mcpWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/neuroghostdev/booster_mcp/booster-review)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/neuroghostdev/booster_mcp/booster-review"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/neuroghostdev/booster_mcp/booster-review.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00023 | $0.00295 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00012 | $0.00148 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00005 | $0.00059 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00002 | $0.00030 |
Grade A, and why
booster-review scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 7d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
What it actually says
booster Review
Цель
Найти реальные риски, а не просто стилистические замечания.
Алгоритм
git_diff("<path>")
git_intelligence(path="<path>", limit=5)
project_memory_recall(query="review <path>")
read_with_context("<file>", line=1, context=200)
find_symbol("<main changed symbol>")
impact_analysis(target="<main changed symbol>", max_depth=3)
call_graph("<main changed symbol>")
import_graph("<file>")
external_deps(file="<file>")
collect_diagnostics(paths=["<file>"], include_security=true)
code_grep("TODO|FIXME|HACK|password|secret|eval|exec")
run_validation_checks(commands=["<tests>"], paths=["<file>"])
Проверяй явно
- инъекции
- секреты в коде
- нарушения слоёв
- ломаную обратную совместимость
- синхронный I/O на горячих путях
- новые или скрытые diagnostics
- security findings из bandit/semgrep/cargo audit, если инструменты доступны
Формат вывода
- критичные риски
- важные замечания
- остаточные риски и пробелы тестов
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 7d ago First seen · 45 lines · 23 tokens per session scan A 00e6216eed53
booster-review is a skill published in the GitHub repository NeuroGhostDev/booster_mcp (0 stars, last pushed 6d ago), licensed MIT. It adds 23 tokens to every session and 295 once invoked, about $0.0001 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.
Other skills, from other repositories
coding-assistant
Provides coding assistance with best practices and code review.
agent-watchdog
Use when asked to watch, babysit, audit, review, compare, or fix another agent's work from a Codex session ID, Claude Code session/transcript, chat/thread link, PR, branch, log, or pasted run summary. Monitor until the other agent is done or blocked, reconstruct what the user asked, independently investigate the same…
comet-verify
Comet Phase 4: Verify and Close. Invoke with /comet-verify. Verify implementation matches design, handle development branch.
gsd-ns-review
Route to the appropriate quality / review skill based on the user's intent. gsd-code-review-fix was absorbed by gsd-code-review --fix in #2790.
review
Review code changes for security, performance, bugs, and quality. Reviews staged changes, unstaged changes, specific commits, or PR-ready diffs.
re0-merge
Review and land an external contribution the way this suite does: gate it against the thesis, land it with the author's credit intact, complete a new skill rather than merging it raw, then approve, credit, and explain before closing. Use when reviewing a pull request, as any collaborator or maintainer, not only the…